Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: a study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations

This study investigates whether the timing of sponsorship disclosure affects viewers’ processing of sponsored content, and whether a disclosure influences the persuasive effect of the sponsored content. A model is proposed in which sponsorship disclosure enhances the recognition of sponsored television content as advertising, which leads to critical processing of the sponsored content. Ultimately, this negatively affects the attitude toward the brand in the sponsored content. This model was supported, but only when the disclosure was displayed prior to or concurrent with the sponsored content. These effects were not found for a sponsorship disclosure shown at the end of the program after the sponsored content. Theoretically, the findings emphasize the importance of disclosure timing. A disclosure displayed prior to or concurrent with the sponsored content, primes the sponsored content and provides sufficient processing time, so viewers recognize the content as advertising and can process it critically. In addition, the findings show that persuasion knowledge and critical processing are important underlying mechanisms for the effect of sponsorship disclosure on brand attitude. Regarding the practical implications for legislators and advertisers, this research demonstrates that sponsorship disclosure can make viewers aware of the sponsored content in television programs. Furthermore, this changes the processing of sponsored content and can also ultimately lead to resistance against persuasion.

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  The effectiveness of unanticipated persuasive communications. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[2]  W. Mcguire,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF FOREWARNING IN DEVELOPING RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION , 1962 .

[3]  J. Freedman,et al.  WARNING, DISTRACTION, AND RESISTANCE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  R. Glen Hass,et al.  Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence , 1975 .

[5]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. , 1977 .

[6]  Richard Reardon,et al.  Forewarning of content and involvement: Consequences for persuasion and resistance to persuasion , 1992 .

[7]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Adolescent Skepticism toward TV Advertising and Knowledge of Advertiser Tactics , 1994 .

[8]  J. Zaichkowsky.  The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[9]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[10]  Eugene D. Jaffe,et al.  Ethical Dimensioins of Advertising Executions , 1998 .

[11]  Peter Wright,et al.  Everyday persuasion knowledge , 1999 .

[12]  Deborah Roedder John.  Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research , 1999 .

[13]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent , 2000 .

[14]  Sharmistha Law,et al.  I'll Have What She's Having: Gauging the Impact of Product Placements on Viewers , 2000 .

[15]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  Attitude Importance, Forewarning of Message Content, and Resistance to Persuasion , 2000 .

[16]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Media Priming: An Updated Synthesis , 2002 .

[17]  Brad J. Sagarin,et al.  Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: the motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analytic syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Selin A. Malkoc,et al.  Embedding Brands Within Media Content: The Impact of Message, Media, and Consumer Characteristics on Placement Efficacy , 2003 .

[20]  Lawrence A. Wenner,et al.  On the Ethics of Product Placement in Media Entertainment , 2004 .

[21]  Eva A van Reijmersdal,et al.  Readers' Reactions to Mixtures of Advertising and Editorial Content in Magazines , 2005 .

[22]  Simon Hudson,et al.  Branded Entertainment: A New Advertising Technique or Product Placement in Disguise? , 2006 .

[23]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Vigilant against Manipulation: The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge , 2007 .

[24]  P. Neijens,et al.  Effects of TV brand placement on brand image , 2007 .

[25]  Eileen Fischer,et al.  An Examination of the Effects of Activating Persuasion Knowledge on Consumer Response to Brands Engaging in Covert Marketing , 2008 .

[26]  A. Pruyn,et al.  Forewarned is forearmed: Conserving self-control strength to resist social influence (Abstract) , 2010 .

[27]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Comparing Children's and Adults' Cognitive Advertising Competences in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[28]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  The moderating effect of manipulative intent and cognitive resources on the evaluation of narrative ads , 2010 .

[29]  Eva A. van Reijmersdal,et al.  Introducing the PCMC Model: An Investigative Framework for Young People's Processing of Commercialized Media Content , 2010 .

[30]  Margee Hume,et al.  Examining the Covert Nature of Product Placement: Implications for Public Policy , 2010 .

[31]  S. Y. Lee.  Ad-induced affect: The effects of forewarning, affect intensity, and prior brand attitude , 2010 .

[32]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion , 2010 .

[33]  R. M. Cain.  Embedded Advertising on Television: Disclosure, Deception, and Free Speech Rights , 2011 .

[34]  Soontae An,et al.  Mitigating the Effects of Advergames on Children , 2011 .

[35]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Sponsorship Disclosure: Effects of Duration on Persuasion Knowledge and Brand Responses , 2012 .

[36]  Glenda Lawrence,et al.  The Audiovisual Media Services Directive , 2014, E-Commerce and Convergence: A Guide to the Law of Digital Media.