Optimal mission abort policy for systems in a random environment with variable shock rate

Abstract To enhance survivability of many real-world critical systems (e.g., aircrafts and human space flight systems), mission abort procedures are often utilized in practice. Specifically, the mission objectives of these systems can be aborted in cases where a certain malfunction condition is met or some obstacles/ hazards occur. Then a rescue or recovery procedure is initiated to enhance survivability. Traditional system reliability models typically cannot address the effects of mission aborts, and thus are not applicable to analyzing systems subject to mission abort requirements. In this paper, we first develop a methodology to model and evaluate mission success probability (MSP) and survivability of systems experiencing both internal failures and external shocks. We consider a policy when a mission is aborted and a rescue procedure is activated if the m-th shock occurs before time ξ since the start of a mission. We demonstrate the tradeoff between system survivability and MSP that should be balanced by the proper choice of the decision variables m and ξ. An illustrative example of a mission performed by an unmanned aerial vehicle is presented.

[1]  Maxim Finkelstein,et al.  Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk , 2008 .

[2]  J. Cha,et al.  On new classes of extreme shock models and some generalizations , 2011 .

[3]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  Reliability of non-repairable phased-mission systems with propagated failures , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2003 .

[5]  B. Klefsjö Survival under the pure birth shock model , 1981 .

[6]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  Optimization of Full versus Incremental Periodic Backup Policy , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[7]  A. Myers Probability of Loss Assessment of Critical $k$-Out-of-$n$:G Systems Having a Mission Abort Policy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[8]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  Heterogeneous Warm Standby Multi-Phase Systems With Variable Mission Time , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[9]  Maxim Finkelstein,et al.  'Time-free' preventive maintenance of systems with structures described by signatures , 2015 .

[10]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  An algorithm for reliability analysis of phased-mission systems , 1999 .

[11]  J. Hüsler,et al.  Realistic variation of shock models , 2005 .

[12]  Yiliu Liu,et al.  Reliability analysis of large phased-mission systems with repairable components based on success-state sampling , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Liudong Xing,et al.  Reliability of demand-based phased-mission systems subject to fault level coverage , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  Probabilistic common cause failures in phased-mission systems , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Liudong Xing,et al.  Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with multiple functional dependence groups , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  J. Mi,et al.  Study of a Stochastic Failure Model in a Random Environment , 2007, Journal of Applied Probability.

[17]  W. Meeker Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analyses , 1991 .

[18]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  Mission Abort Policy in Heterogeneous Nonrepairable 1-Out-of-N Warm Standby Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[19]  Jonathan L. Bell,et al.  Reliability growth planning based on essential function failures , 2014, 2014 Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[20]  F. Mallor,et al.  Shocks, runs and random sums , 2001, Journal of Applied Probability.

[21]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .