An investigation of the effect of boundary conditions on the mechanical characteristics of an energy storing and returning prosthetic foot subject to non-destructive testing

It has been recognised that that the mechanical characteristics of Energy Storing and Returning (ESR) prosthetic running feet are not well understood and inconsistent static rating results have been reported elsewhere. The hypothesis that the inconsistent results are due to the varying foot mounting methods used during non-destructive testing was investigated. An ESR prosthetic running foot was rigidly mounted to the load cell of a hydraulic test machine while the metatarsal region of the foot contacted the machine bed. The friction between the foot and the machine bed was varied to create different mounting conditions. For each mounting condition, the foot was displaced vertically and force-displacement data was collected to compare the measured peak force and efficiency of the foot. It is shown that the mounting method affects both the peak measured force (1.2-2.83kN) and efficiency (71-97%) of the foot under test. A novel mounting strategy was then proposed and assessed to overcome the limitations of the previously used mounting methods. The new mounting method produced a linear spring rate across the entire displacement leading to an efficiency of 99.4% and peak measured force of 1.71kN which was in agreement with previously collected data during amputee running. It is concluded that the inconsistencies in reported mechanical characteristics of Energy Storing and Returning prosthetic feet are due to the varying foot mounting methods used during non-destructive testing. A novel foot mounting method has been shown to overcome the limitations of the previous research. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the effect of the prostheses mechanical properties on running performance.

[1]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  R. Cooper,et al.  Adaptive Sports Technology and Biomechanics: Prosthetics , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[3]  Keisyoku Sakuraba,et al.  The effects of changes in the sagittal plane alignment of running-specific transtibial prostheses on ground reaction forces , 2015, Journal of physical therapy science.

[4]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Hopping frequency in humans: a test of how springs set stride frequency in bouncing gaits. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  An Investigation Into the Measurement and Prediction of Mechanical Stiffness of Lower Limb Prostheses Used for Running , 2014, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[7]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[9]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprinting prostheses , 2008 .

[10]  G. Dalleau,et al.  The spring-mass model and the energy cost of treadmill running , 1998, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  M. Dupac,et al.  Understanding the design variables that contribute to the response of a prosthetic foot: Part I — Rig design , 2016, 2016 International Conference Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Optimization (MEDO).

[13]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  The dynamic elastic response to impulse synchronisation of composite prosthetic energy storing and returning feet , 2014 .

[14]  Shihab Asfour,et al.  A New Methodology to Measure the Running Biomechanics of Amputees , 2009, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[15]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  How should we assess the mechanical properties of lower-limb prosthesis technology used in elite sport?: An initial investigation , 2013 .

[16]  J G Buckley Biomechanical adaptations of transtibial amputee sprinting in athletes using dedicated prostheses. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  R. Blickhan The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Hiroaki Hobara,et al.  Amputee locomotion: spring-like leg behavior and stiffness regulation using running-specific prostheses. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Lee Nolan,et al.  Carbon fibre prostheses and running in amputees: a review. , 2008, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[21]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Performance enhancement of bi-lateral lower-limb amputees in the latter phases of running events: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[22]  M. Geil Energy Loss and Stiffness Properties of Dynamic Elastic Response Prosthetic Feet , 2001 .