Physician Views on the Provision of Information on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy to Patients with Cancer and Pre-Existing Autoimmune Disease: A Qualitative Study

Simple Summary This study provides physicians’ perspectives on the information cancer patients with autoimmune diseases should learn when considering ICI. This information can be incorporated into patient–doctor discussions and educational tools to improve shared decision-making in this patient population. Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer outcomes but can cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and flares of autoimmune conditions in cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease. The objective of this study was to identify the information physicians perceived as most useful for these patients when discussing treatment initiation with ICIs. Twenty physicians at a cancer institution with experience in the treatment of irAEs were interviewed. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to organize and interpret data. The physicians were 11 medical oncologists and 9 non-oncology specialists. The following themes were identified: (1) current methods used by physicians to provide information to patients and delivery options; (2) factors to make decisions about whether or not to start ICIs in patients who have cancer and pre-existing autoimmune conditions; (3) learning points for patients to understand; (4) preferences for the delivery of ICI information; and (5) barriers to the implementation of ICI information in clinics. Regarding points to discuss with patients, physicians agreed that the benefits of ICIs, the probability of irAEs, and risks of underlying autoimmune condition flares with the use of ICIs were most important. Non-oncologists were additionally concerned about how ICIs affect the autoimmune disease (e.g., impact on disease activity, need for changes in medications for the autoimmune disease, and monitoring of autoimmune conditions).

[1]  M. Balasegaram,et al.  DIGITISATION & HEALTH - REFLECTIONS FROM THE COVID PANDEMIC , 2023, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[2]  B. Cagnie,et al.  Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of pain neuroscience education in the current Lebanese physical therapist health care approach: a qualitative study. , 2023, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  T. Nijsten,et al.  Experiences of resuming life after immunotherapy and associated survivorship care needs: a qualitative study among patients with metastatic melanoma , 2022, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  R. Cornet,et al.  Exploring supportive care and information needs through a proposed eHealth application among melanoma patients undergoing systemic therapy: a qualitative study , 2022, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[5]  F. He,et al.  Process Evaluation of an Application-Based Salt Reduction Intervention in School Children and Their Families (AppSalt) in China: A Mixed-Methods Study , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[6]  P. Grivas,et al.  Management of Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in an Evolving Treatment Landscape: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives of First-Line Therapies. , 2021, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[7]  R. van Leeuwen,et al.  An Online Competency-Based Spiritual Care Education Tool for Oncology Nurses. , 2021, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[8]  P. Zhou,et al.  DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[9]  Namrata Singh,et al.  Association of blood biomarkers and autoimmunity with immune related adverse events in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[10]  H. Friederich,et al.  Patient expectations are better for immunotherapy than traditional chemotherapy for cancer , 2020, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[11]  I. Wong,et al.  Immunotherapy and associated immune-related adverse events at a large UK centre: a mixed methods study , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[12]  S. D'Angelo,et al.  Patient Experiences with Avelumab in Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Longitudinal Qualitative Interview Findings from JAVELIN Merkel 200, a Registrational Clinical Trial , 2020, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

[13]  Mario Chen,et al.  A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research , 2020, PloS one.

[14]  A. Oza,et al.  Cancer patients’ experiences with immune checkpoint modulators: A qualitative study , 2020, Cancer medicine.

[15]  Ami A. Shah,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis: a qualitative study identifying unmet patient needs and care gaps , 2020, BMC Rheumatology.

[16]  J. Shaw,et al.  The value of immunotherapy for survivors of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: patient perspectives on quality of life , 2020, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[17]  B. Engelward,et al.  Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer. , 2019, DNA repair.

[18]  D. Milne,et al.  Balancing the Hype with Reality: What Do Patients with Advanced Melanoma Consider When Making the Decision to Have Immunotherapy? , 2019, The oncologist.

[19]  D. Brixner,et al.  Immunotargeted therapy in melanoma: patient, provider preferences, and willingness to pay at an academic cancer center , 2019, Melanoma research.

[20]  C. McNeil,et al.  Certainty within uncertainty: a qualitative study of the experience of metastatic melanoma patients undergoing pembrolizumab immunotherapy , 2018, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[21]  Liping Yu,et al.  PD-1 Inhibitor Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Preexisting Endocrine Autoimmunity. , 2018, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[22]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[23]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Patient perspectives on ipilimumab across the melanoma treatment trajectory , 2017, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[24]  A. Lerner,et al.  The World Incidence and Prevalence of Autoimmune Diseases is Increasing , 2015 .

[25]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  C. Rudin,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[28]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[30]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.

[31]  J. Slansky,et al.  Multiple associations between a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. , 2012, Anticancer research.

[32]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies , 2010, Psychology & health.

[33]  S. B. Thomson,et al.  Sample Size and Grounded Theory , 2010 .

[34]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Glinda S Cooper,et al.  Recent insights in the epidemiology of autoimmune diseases: improved prevalence estimates and understanding of clustering of diseases. , 2009, Journal of autoimmunity.

[36]  S. Hogan,et al.  Environmental epidemiology and risk factors for autoimmune disease , 2003, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[37]  J. Mandelblatt,et al.  Equitable access to cancer services , 1999, Cancer.

[38]  Kathy Charmaz,et al.  Grounded Theory: Methodology and Theory Construction , 2001 .