Mechanics Based Tomography: A Preliminary Feasibility Study

We present a non-destructive approach to sense inclusion objects embedded in a solid medium remotely from force sensors applied to the medium and boundary displacements that could be measured via a digital image correlation system using a set of cameras. We provide a rationale and strategy to uniquely identify the heterogeneous sample composition based on stiffness (here, shear modulus) maps. The feasibility of this inversion scheme is tested with simulated experiments that could have clinical relevance in diagnostic imaging (e.g., tumor detection) or could be applied to engineering materials. No assumptions are made on the shape or stiffness quantity of the inclusions. We observe that the novel inversion method using solely boundary displacements and force measurements performs well in recovering the heterogeneous material/tissue composition that consists of one and two stiff inclusions embedded in a softer background material. Furthermore, the target shear modulus value for the stiffer inclusion region is underestimated and the inclusion size is overestimated when incomplete boundary displacements on some part of the boundary are utilized. For displacements measured on the entire boundary, the shear modulus reconstruction improves significantly. Additionally, we observe that with increasing number of displacement data sets utilized in solving the inverse problem, the quality of the mapped shear moduli improves. We also analyze the sensitivity of the shear modulus maps on the noise level varied between 0.1% and 5% white Gaussian noise in the boundary displacements, force and corresponding displacement indentation. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the recovered shear moduli to the depth, stiffness and the shape of the stiff inclusion is performed. We conclude that this approach has potential as a novel imaging modality and refer to it as Mechanics Based Tomography (MBT).

[1]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[2]  Jingfeng Jiang,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Elastic Modulus Imaging: An Application to Breast Cancer Diagnosis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Viksit Kumar,et al.  Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  Assad A Oberai,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[6]  Yue Mei,et al.  Regularizing Biomechanical Maps for Partially Known Material Properties , 2017 .

[7]  Yue Mei,et al.  Estimating the non-homogeneous elastic modulus distribution from surface deformations , 2016 .

[8]  C. Vogel Computational Methods for Inverse Problems , 1987 .

[9]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Study of dynamic underwater implosion mechanics using digital image correlation , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Marvin M. Doyley,et al.  Noninvasive Vascular Displacement Estimation for Relative Elastic Modulus Reconstruction in Transversal Imaging Planes , 2013, Sensors.

[11]  R. Ramlau,et al.  Morozov's discrepancy principle for Tikhonov-type functionals with nonlinear operators , 2010 .

[12]  Yong Liu,et al.  Higher order stabilized finite element method for hyperelastic finite deformation , 2002 .

[13]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Yue Mei,et al.  Reduced Boundary Sensitivity and Improved Contrast of the Regularized Inverse Problem Solution in Elasticity , 2016 .

[15]  Jingfeng Jiang,et al.  Recent results in nonlinear strain and modulus imaging. , 2011, Current medical imaging reviews.

[16]  Sevan Goenezen,et al.  Inverse Problems , 2008 .

[17]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  An Inverse Problem Approach for Elasticity Imaging through Vibroacoustics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Debaditya Dutta,et al.  A computationally efficient approach for inverse material characterization combining Gappy POD with direct inversion , 2015 .

[19]  Assad A. Oberai,et al.  INVERSE PROBLEMS PII: S0266-5611(03)54272-1 Solution of inverse problems in elasticity imaging using the adjoint method , 2003 .

[20]  L. Wilson,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of small displacements and deformations of tissue. , 1982, Ultrasonic imaging.

[21]  Thomas Bonesky Morozov's discrepancy principle and Tikhonov-type functionals , 2008 .

[22]  J. Orteu,et al.  Use of 3-D Digital Image Correlation to Characterize the Mechanical Behavior of a Fiber Reinforced Refractory Castable , 2007 .

[23]  C. Vogel Non-convergence of the L-curve regularization parameter selection method , 1996 .

[24]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization , 1997, TOMS.

[25]  Stéphane Avril,et al.  The Virtual Fields Method for Extracting Constitutive Parameters From Full‐Field Measurements: a Review , 2006 .

[26]  C. S. Spalding,et al.  In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  C. R. Hill,et al.  Measurement of soft tissue motion using correlation between A-scans. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  A nonlinear inversion method for 3D electromagnetic imaging using adjoint fields , 1999 .