What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade students

Two component skills are thought to be necessary for successful word problem solving: (1) the production of visual-schematic representations and (2) the derivation of the correct relations between the solution-relevant elements from the text base. The first component skill is grounded in the visual–spatial domain, and presumed to be influenced by spatial ability, whereas the latter is seated in the linguistic–semantic domain, and presumed to be influenced by reading comprehension. These component skills as well as their underlying basic abilities are examined in 128 sixth grade students through path analysis. The results of the path analysis showed that both component skills and their underlying basic abilities explained 49% of students’ word problem solving performance. Furthermore, spatial ability and reading comprehension both had a direct and an indirect relation (via the component skills) with word problem solving performance. These results contribute to the development of instruction methods that help students using these components while solving word problems.

[1]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[2]  Claudia Quaiser-Pohl,et al.  The Mental Cutting Test "Schnitte" and the Picture Rotation Test-Two New Measures to Assess Spatial Ability , 2003 .

[3]  Stephen J. Pape,et al.  Middle School Children's Problem-Solving Behavior: A Cognitive Analysis from a Reading Comprehension Perspective , 2004 .

[4]  S. Kaufman.  Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? , 2007 .

[5]  Barbara J. Orde.  Drawing as Visual-Perceptual and Spatial Ability Training. , 1997 .

[6]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  J. Oakhill,et al.  The Strategic use of Alternative Representations in Arithmetic Word Problem Solving , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Mayer,et al.  Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. , 1987 .

[9]  Timothy C. Papadopoulos,et al.  Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers , 2012 .

[10]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. , 1999 .

[11]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Providing or designing? Constructing models in primary maths education , 2003 .

[12]  J. Terwel,et al.  Strategic Learning in Primary Mathematics Education: Effects of an Experimental Program in Modelling , 2003 .

[13]  Catherine Thevenot.  Arithmetic word problem solving: evidence for the construction of a mental model. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi,et al.  Visual representations in mathematical word problem solving among form four students in Malacca , 2010 .

[15]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[16]  Danièle Coquin-Viennot,et al.  Highlighting the role of the episodic situation model in the solving of arithmetical problems , 2003 .

[17]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[18]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  The Effects of Schema-Based Instruction on the Mathematical Word-Problem-Solving Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[19]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[20]  Juanita V. Copley,et al.  The Development of Spatial Skills Through Interventions Involving Block Building Activities , 2008 .

[21]  Rhonda Booth,et al.  Visualization in Mathematics Learning: Arithmetic Problem-Solving and Student Difficulties , 1999 .

[22]  T. Keith,et al.  Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities , 2008 .

[23]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[24]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Using Retelling Data to Study Elementary School Children's Representations and Solutions of Compare Problems. , 1994 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[26]  Fulya Kula.  Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., and De Corte, E. (2000). Making Sense of Word Problems. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. , 2007 .

[27]  M. Daneman,et al.  A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension , 2001 .

[28]  M. Battista.  Spatial Visualization and Gender Differences in High School Geometry. , 1990 .

[29]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  M. Casey,et al.  Spatial-Mechanical Reasoning Skills versus Mathematics Self-Confidence as Mediators of Gender Differences on Mathematics Subtests Using Cross-National Gender-Based Items , 2001 .

[31]  H. Schriefers.  Lexical and conceptual factors in the naming of relations , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Gender-related effects of contemporary math instruction for low performers on problem-solving behavior , 2007 .

[33]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[34]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[35]  M. Casey,et al.  Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: a comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[36]  Stephen J. Pape,et al.  Compare word problems: Consistency hypothesis revisited , 2003 .

[37]  Julia Grant,et al.  Comprehension of Spatial Language Terms in Williams Syndrome: Evidence for an Interaction Between Domains of Strength and Weakness , 2004, Cortex.

[38]  E. Corte,et al.  Solving Compare Problems: An Eye-Movement Test of Lewis and Mayer's Consistency Hypothesis , 2007 .

[39]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .

[41]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Representations and strategies for solving dynamic and static arithmetic word problems: The role of working memory capacities , 2006 .

[42]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. , 1969 .

[43]  P N Johnson-Laird,et al.  Reasoning about relations. , 2005, Psychological review.

[44]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[45]  Judith Fonzi,et al.  Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students. , 2007, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[46]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Spatial Situation Models and Text Comprehension. , 1995, Discourse processes.

[47]  Kaisa Aunola,et al.  The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension , 2008 .

[48]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  Kerry Lee,et al.  Working memory and literacy as predictors of performance on algebraic word problems. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[50]  The solution of compare problems among first-grade students , 2001 .

[51]  Delinda van Garderen,et al.  Spatial Visualization, Visual Imagery, and Mathematical Problem Solving of Students With Varying Abilities , 2006 .

[52]  N. Presmeg.  Generalization Using Imagery in Mathematics , 2013 .

[53]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Schema-Based Word-Problem—Solving Instruction for Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities , 2002 .

[54]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Comprehension of Arithmetic Word Problems: Evidence from Students' Eye Fixations. , 1992 .

[55]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  Locating starting points in differential equations: a realistic mathematics education approach , 2000 .

[56]  E. Corte,et al.  Influence of rewording verbal problems on children's problem representations and solutions , 1985 .

[57]  The Effects of Schema-Based Instruction on Word Problem Solving in Students with Disabilities , 2015 .

[58]  E. Corte,et al.  Making sense of word problems , 2000 .

[59]  Brooks Applegate,et al.  Middle School Students' Perceptions, Persistence, and Performance in Mathematical Problem Solving , 2000 .

[60]  E. Corte,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Structure on First Graders' Strategies for Solving Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. , 1987 .

[61]  Delinda van Garderen,et al.  Visual–Spatial Representation, Mathematical Problem Solving, and Students of Varying Abilities , 2003 .

[62]  Nils S⊘vik,et al.  The Relation between Reading Comprehension and Task‐specific Strategies used in Arithmetical Word Problems , 1999 .

[63]  P. French.  Linguistic marking, strategy, and affect in syllogistic reasoning , 1979, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[64]  M. Casey,et al.  The Influence of Spatial Ability on Gender Differences in Mathematics College Entrance Test Scores across Diverse Samples. , 1995 .

[65]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .

[66]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. , 1995 .

[67]  Menno van der Schoot,et al.  The consistency effect depends on markedness in less successful but not successful problem solvers : An eye movement study in primary school children , 2009 .

[68]  Ellen F. Potter,et al.  How Students “Unpack” the Structure of a Word Problem: Graphic Representations and Problem Solving , 2008 .