Modeling and Analysis of Merging Behavior at Expressway On-Ramp Bottlenecks

Merging behavior is inevitable for drivers at on-ramp bottlenecks and a significant factor in triggering a traffic breakdown. Empirical data were collected by extracting trajectories from merging vehicles and adjacent vehicles at two on-ramp bottlenecks in Shanghai, China. These data included 58 normal (free-flow) lane changes (NLCs), 36 cooperative lane changes (CLCs), 135 forced lane changes (FLCs), and 188 unsuccessful lane changes (USLCs). The objective was to develop and compare five discrete choice models (two multinomial logit and three nested logit) to understand merging behavior at on-ramp bottlenecks better. Estimation results showed that the two-level nested logit model considering three merging types (NLC, CLC, and FLC) provided the best fit. The traffic flow condition (bottleneck), the time gap and the space gap of the lag vehicle, and the speed of the merging vehicle were key factors when choosing merging types. The resulting quantitative models can be used to perform a microscopic analysis of the breakdown mechanism and develop a traffic simulation model.

[1]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE STRUCTURE OF LANE-CHANGING DECISIONS , 1986 .

[2]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Information Categorization Based on Driver Behavior for Urban Lane-Changing Maneuvers , 2011 .

[3]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Modeling Cooperative Lane Changing and Forced Merging Behavior , 2007 .

[4]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[5]  Jian Sun,et al.  Mechanism of Early-Onset Breakdown at On-Ramp Bottlenecks on Shanghai, China, Expressways , 2014 .

[6]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Do microscopic merging models reproduce the observed priority sharing ratio in congestion , 2009 .

[7]  Hideyuki Kita,et al.  A merging–giveway interaction model of cars in a merging section: a game theoretic analysis , 1999 .

[8]  Jiao Wang.  A Simulation Model for Motorway Merging Behaviour , 2005 .

[9]  P Hidas,et al.  Modelling individual behaviour in microsimulation models , 2005 .

[10]  Frederik Michel Dekking,et al.  Confidence intervals for the mean , 2005 .

[11]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Some Guidelines for Selecting Microsimulation Models for Interchange Traffic Operational Analysis , 2005 .

[12]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Merging Behavior at Freeway On-Ramp , 2010 .

[13]  Chang Ho Park,et al.  MODELING OF THE GAP ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR AT A MERGING SECTION OF URBAN FREEWAY , 2005 .

[14]  Peter Hidas,et al.  MODELLING LANE CHANGING AND MERGING IN MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION , 2002 .

[15]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model , 2008 .

[16]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[17]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[18]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Integrated Lane Change Model with Relaxation and Synchronization , 2012 .

[19]  Peter Hidas,et al.  Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving , 2005 .