Metacognitive control of action: Preparation for aiming reflects knowledge of Fitts’s law

Metacognitive control has been studied in intellectual skills but has not yet been studied in perceptual-motor skills. To probe metacognitive control in a perceptual-motor context, we developed a task in which participants chose the position of a cursor relative to two targets. One of the two targets was randomly erased. Participants tried to move the cursor into the remaining target within a limited amount of time. The target widths were varied, making the difficulty of moving to either target dependent on the chosen cursor position. Predictions were based on the assumption that participants could use an analogue of Fitts’s law to choose optimal positions. The fit between observed and predicted positions was excellent, suggesting that participants used information about movement speed-accuracy trade-offs to guide movement preparation. The findings suggest that metacognition applies to both perceptual-motor skills and intellectual skills, and that these two domains are more similar than traditionally assumed.

[1]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[3]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  How Shall We Explain the Delayed-Judgment-Of-Learning Effect? , 1992 .

[6]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[7]  G. Logan Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Metacognition in Action: The Importance of Implementation Intentions , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[9]  MacKenzie Is A Note on the Information-Theoretic Basis for Fitts’ Law , 1989 .

[10]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[11]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy , 1996 .

[12]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[13]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .

[15]  R. Cohen,et al.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  K. Newell,et al.  Time scales in motor learning and development. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Speed—Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[18]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  T. O. Nelson Consciousness and metacognition. , 1996 .

[21]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  D. Wolpert Computational approaches to motor control , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.