Enhancing Socially Responsible Innovation in Industry: Practical Use for Considerations of Social and Ethical Aspects in Industrial Life Science & Technology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Benjamin S. Halpern,et al. The Engaged University: Providing a Platform for Research That Transforms Society , 2010 .
[2] Neville Craddock. Flies in the soup—European GM labeling legislation , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[3] Steve Strand,et al. Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition , 2006 .
[4] W. S. Lyon. Social studies of science and us. I. , 1984 .
[5] David H. Guston,et al. Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.
[6] Ibo van de Poel,et al. The transformation of technological regimes , 2003 .
[7] Jane Calvert,et al. The role of social scientists in synthetic biology , 2009, EMBO reports.
[8] E. Deci,et al. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.
[9] R. Narula. R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .
[10] Daan Schuurbiers,et al. Erratum to: What Happens in the Lab Does Not Stay in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[11] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.
[12] J. Durant. Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science , 1999 .
[13] G. Gaskell,et al. Biotechnology in the years of controversy: a social scientific perspective , 2001 .
[14] George Cheney,et al. Talking ‘facts’: identity and rationality in industry perspectives on genetic modification , 2007 .
[15] A. Faaij,et al. Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications , 2008 .
[16] P. Osseweijer,et al. Genomics in Industry: issues of a bio-based economy , 2010, Genomics, society, and policy.
[17] D. Schuurbiers. Social Responsibility in Research Practice: Engaging applied scientists with the socio-ethical context of their work , 2010 .
[18] Jack Stilgoe,et al. The Public Value of Science: Or How to Ensure That Science Really Matters , 2005 .
[19] N. Pidgeon,et al. Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry , 2007 .
[20] Neelke Doorn,et al. Responsibility in Engineering: Toward a New Role for Engineering Ethicists , 2010 .
[21] Brian Wynne,et al. Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[22] K. Davies,et al. Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.
[23] Sally Randles,et al. From Nano‐Ethicswash to Real‐Time Regulation , 2008 .
[24] Frank Vanclay,et al. Conceptualising social impacts , 2002 .
[25] Jo Anne Shatkin,et al. Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis , 2008 .
[26] R. Karsh. The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution , 1961 .
[27] Mark Bovens,et al. The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations , 1998 .
[28] Annemiek Nelis,et al. Societal dialogue needs more than public engagement , 2009, EMBO reports.
[29] Sheila Jasanoff,et al. Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[30] Tsjalling Swierstra,et al. Responsibility without Moralism in Technoscientific Design Practice , 2006 .
[31] Amy J. Burgin,et al. Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society , 2010 .
[32] P. Galison. Refections on Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics , 1999, Perspectives on Science.
[33] J. Suomala,et al. Framework to study the social innovation networks , 2006 .
[34] Tsjalling Swierstra,et al. Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies , 2011, Nanoethics.
[35] W. J. Vrakking,et al. Success and failure of 50 innovation projects in Dutch companies , 2000 .
[36] Ruud Smits,et al. Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures , 1995 .
[37] Richard Owen,et al. Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[38] Linda A. Hall,et al. A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry , 2002 .
[39] F.T.J.M. Fortuin,et al. The Dynamics of the Strategic Network Relations between Corporate R&D and Business. A Longitudinal Analysis in a Large, Technology Based Multinational Company , 2007 .
[40] J K Nanson,et al. 'This won't hurt a bit'. , 1999, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.
[41] Simone van der Burg,et al. Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice , 2009 .
[42] Steven M. Flipse,et al. Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[43] C. Shelley-Egan,et al. The Ambivalence of Promising Technology , 2010, Nanoethics.
[44] H. M. Collins,et al. The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.
[45] J. Ravetz,et al. The post-normal science of precaution , 2004 .
[46] Audley Genus. Rethinking constructive technology assessment as democratic, reflective, discourse , 2006 .
[47] A. Rip,et al. Narrative Infrastructure in Product Creation Processes , 2000 .
[48] Michael E. Gorman,et al. Trading zones and interactional expertise , 2007 .
[49] Matthias Kaiser. Commentary: looking for conflict and finding none? , 2012, Public understanding of science.
[50] A. J. Koops,et al. The biobased economy : biofuels, materials and chemicals in the post-oil era , 2010 .
[51] Ibo van de Poel,et al. On the Role of Outsiders in Technical Development , 2000 .
[52] Steven M. Flipse,et al. Setting Up Spaces for Collaboration in Industry Between Researchers from the Natural and Social Sciences , 2014, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[53] Neelke Doorn,et al. Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives , 2009, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[54] Andrew Webster,et al. Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room , 2007 .
[55] Sarah R. Davies,et al. Constructing Communication , 2008 .
[56] Steven S. Vickner,et al. Media Coverage of Biotech Foods and Influence on Consumer Choice , 2004 .
[57] N. Doorn. Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development (R&D) , 2012 .
[58] F. Schmidt,et al. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .
[59] M. Lengwiler. Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology , 2008 .
[60] Michael E. Gorman,et al. Moral Imagination, Trading Zones, and the Role of the Ethicist in Nanotechnology , 2009 .
[61] C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al. Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms , 2004 .
[62] J. H. Jensen,et al. The social aspects of food biotechnology: a European view. , 1999, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.
[63] P. Osseweijer. A Short History of Talking Biotech : Fifteen years of iterative action research in institutionalising scientists' engagement in public communication , 2006 .
[64] Judy A. Siguaw,et al. Conceptualizing Innovation Orientation: A Framework for Study and Integration of Innovation Research* , 2006 .
[65] Shannon N. Conley. Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-Technical Integration , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[66] J. Bessant,et al. Innovation Management Measurement: A Review , 2006 .
[67] Simone van der Burg,et al. Imagining the Future of Photoacoustic Mammography , 2009, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[68] Arie Rip,et al. Futures of ELSA , 2009, EMBO reports.
[69] M. Feldman,et al. Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .
[70] Colin Macilwain,et al. Genetics: Watching science at work , 2009, Nature.
[71] Directorate Energy. Energy research in the 7th framework programme , 2007 .
[72] Michael E. Gorman,et al. Turning Good into Gold: A Comparative Study of Two Environmental Invention Networks , 2002 .
[73] Deborah G. Johnson. Ethics and Technology ‘in the Making’: An Essay on the Challenge of Nanoethics , 2007 .
[74] François Thoreau. The ‘interpretive flexibility’ of nanotechnologies in context: the case of a leading R&D center in Flanders, Belgium , 2010 .
[75] Arie Rip,et al. Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology , 2007 .
[76] Juliana Hsuan,et al. Outsourcing R&D: A Review, Model, and Research Agenda , 2010 .
[77] S.W.F. Omta,et al. Identifying key performance indicators in food technology contract R&D , 2013 .
[78] Irwin Weiser,et al. Going Public: What Writing Programs Learn from Engagement , 2010 .
[79] Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al. Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resource Issues , 2004 .
[80] S. Arduino,et al. Contamination of Community Potable Water from Land Grabbing: A Case Study from Rural Tanzania , 2012 .
[81] John L. Campbell. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .
[82] Eleonore Pauwels,et al. The Value of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to Sustainability Research: A Critical Approach Toward Synthetic Biology Promises , 2011 .
[83] Arie Rip,et al. Mind the gap revisited. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.
[84] Dan Marsh,et al. UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO Hamilton New Zealand Does New Zealand have an Innovation System for Biotechnology? , 2002 .
[85] F.T.J.M. Fortuin,et al. Facing the global Challange to raise the innovation power of the agrifoog companies. Creating an innovation assessment tool , 2009 .
[86] S. Omta,et al. Innovation drivers and barriers in food processing , 2009 .
[87] Toni Ahlqvist,et al. Integrating future-oriented technology analysis and risk assessment methodologies , 2009 .
[88] A. Kleinknecht,et al. Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review , 2003 .
[89] T. Gieryn. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .
[90] Erik Fisher,et al. Lab‐scale intervention , 2009, EMBO reports.
[91] Ellen H.M. Moors,et al. User producer interaction in context , 2012 .
[92] Audley Genus,et al. On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..
[93] Roop L. Mahajan,et al. Embedding the humanities in engineering: Art, dialogue, and a laboratory , 2010 .
[94] A. Bryman. Social Research Methods, 4th Edition , 2012 .
[95] B. Penders,et al. The Social Study of Corporate Science: A Research Manifesto , 2009 .
[96] Debasmita Patra,et al. Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration into the Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA , 2011 .
[97] Julian D Marshall,et al. Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.
[98] A. Rip. A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance - and its ironies , 2006 .
[99] Etienne Wenger,et al. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .
[100] B. Penders,et al. Credibility Engineering in the Food Industry: Linking Science, Regulation, and Marketing in a Corporate Context , 2011, Science in Context.
[101] J. Marshall. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .
[102] Matthew C. Nisbet,et al. Attention Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate , 2006 .
[103] Bruno S. Silvestre,et al. Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: The evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture , 2011 .
[104] Luk Van Langenhove,et al. Integration of Technology Assessment in R&D Management Practices , 1998 .
[105] H. Nowotny. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .
[106] P. Thomas. The devil is in the detql: revealing the social and political processes of technology management , 1996 .
[107] Rutger O. van Merkerk,et al. Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies , 2008 .
[108] Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes,et al. Mass media framing of biotechnology news , 2007 .
[109] J. Hollander. Improving performance in business development , 2002 .
[110] Roland Jackson,et al. Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues , 2005 .
[111] P. Osseweijer,et al. Media attention to GM food cases: An innovation perspective , 2013, Public understanding of science.
[112] Martha S. Feldman,et al. Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers , 2003 .
[113] Martin W. Bauer,et al. Biotechnology - the Making of a Global Controversy , 2002 .
[114] Howard B. Lee,et al. A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed , 1973 .
[115] Abagail McWilliams,et al. Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .
[116] C. Cassell,et al. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .
[117] Ruud Smits,et al. In search of relevance: The changing contract between science and society , 2009 .
[118] Henk Verhoog. The responsibilities of scientists , 1981 .
[119] News coverage of biotechnology debates , 2003 .
[120] Charles J. Fombrun,et al. Essentials of Corporate Communication: Implementing Practices for Effective Reputation Management , 2007 .
[121] Jason Chilvers. Engaging Research Councils? An evaluation of a Nanodialogues experiment in upstream public engagement , 2005 .
[122] A. Rip,et al. Users and unicorns: a discussion of mythical beasts in interactive science , 2000 .
[123] Erik Fisher,et al. Legislating the laboratory? Promotion and precaution in a nanomaterials company. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.
[124] Roland Clift,et al. Industrial constructions of publics and public knowledge: a qualitative investigation of practice in the UK chemicals industry , 2007 .
[125] Joaquín Alegre,et al. Measuring innovation in long product development cycle industries: an insight in biotechnology , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..
[126] Paul Trott,et al. Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing , 2006 .
[127] B. S. Piachaud,et al. Outsourcing in the pharmaceutical manufacturing process: an examination of the CRO experience , 2002 .
[128] Joseph Z. Shyu,et al. Policy tools on the formation of new biotechnology firms in Taiwan , 2005 .
[129] Seth Pettie,et al. Mind the gap , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[130] Yanuar Nugroho,et al. Mapping issues and envisaging futures: An evolutionary scenario approach , 2012 .
[131] Michael Davis,et al. Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.
[132] B. Penders. From seeking health to finding healths : the politics of large-scale cooperation in nutrition science , 2008 .
[133] E. Huizingh. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .
[134] Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al. Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what? , 2011 .
[135] R. Cooper,et al. New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .
[136] Michael S. Carolan,et al. The Precautionary Principle and Traditional Risk Assessment , 2007 .
[137] D. Hine,et al. Harmonizing science and business agendas for growth in new biotechnology firms: Case comparisons from five countries , 2007 .
[138] P. Verbeek,et al. Materializing Morality , 2006 .
[139] James Wilsdon,et al. See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .
[140] Roop L. Mahajan,et al. MIDSTREAM MODULATION OF NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH IN AN ACADEMIC LABORATORY , 2006 .
[141] S.W.F. Omta,et al. Factors related to innovative output in the Dutch agrifood industry , 2006 .
[142] J. Chuck. Hypothetical biotechnology companies: A role‐playing student centered activity for undergraduate science students , 2011, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
[143] Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen,et al. An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry , 2007 .
[144] Erik Fisher,et al. Editorial Overview - Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom? , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[145] Brian Sager,et al. Scenarios on the future of biotechnology , 2001 .
[146] F. Wickson,et al. Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology , 2011 .
[147] Lewis Wolpert,et al. Is cell science dangerous? , 2007, Journal of Medical Ethics.
[148] S.W.F. Omta,et al. Key Success Factors of Innovation in Multinational Agrifood Prospector Companies , 2007 .
[149] David A. Aaker,et al. The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets , 2001 .
[150] N. Denzin. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .
[151] Frank Vanclay,et al. Technology Assessment in Social Context: The case for a new framework for assessing and shaping technological developments , 2010 .
[152] S. Duvail,et al. Land and water grabbing in an east african coastal wetland : the case of the Tana delta , 2012 .
[153] H. Kaiser. An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .
[154] Boaz Bernstein,et al. From Invention to Innovation: Toward Developing an Integrated Innovation Model for Biotech Firms , 2006, Journal of Product Innovation Management.
[155] Robert G. Cooper,et al. THE INVISIBLE SUCCESS FACTORS IN PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1999 .
[156] A. Rip,et al. The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .
[157] Arie Rip,et al. Interactive Technology Assessment in the Real World , 2008 .
[158] R. V. Schomberg. Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .
[159] R. Bennett,et al. Inequality and GM Crops: A Case-Study of Bt Cotton in India , 2007 .
[160] Bart Penders,et al. Sensitization: reciprocity and reflection in scientific practice , 2009, EMBO reports.
[161] C. Fombrun,et al. Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .
[162] C. Mitcham,et al. Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .
[163] M. Bucchi,et al. Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions , 2011 .
[164] B. Tabachnick,et al. Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .
[165] L. A. Marks,et al. MEDIA COVERAGE OF AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY: DID THE BUTTERFLY HAVE AN EFFECT? , 2003 .
[166] The Sociology of Intellectual Life: The Career of the Mind in and Around Academy , 2010 .
[167] A. Nordmann. If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics , 2007, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.
[168] Robert G. Cooper,et al. The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .
[169] A. Stirling. “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .
[170] Steven M. Flipse,et al. The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[171] P. Stegmaier,et al. The rock ‘n’ roll of knowledge co‐production , 2009, EMBO reports.
[172] D. Collingridge. The social control of technology , 1980 .
[173] L. Louw,et al. A framework for managing the innovation process , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.
[174] S. Omta,et al. Can Premium Brand Beat Private label Innovation? Comparing Premium Brand and Private label Innovation Projects in a Food Processing Company. , 2010 .
[175] John Grin,et al. Technology Assessment as Learning , 1996 .
[176] Susan Leigh Star,et al. Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .
[177] Rosalyn W Berne,et al. Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology , 2004, Science and engineering ethics.
[178] Frans J. Meijman,et al. Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches , 2008 .
[179] Erik Fisher,et al. Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions , 2007 .
[180] H. Zwart. Biotechnology and naturalness in the genomics era: plotting a timetable for the biotechnology debate , 2009 .
[181] R. Shields. Hope and Fear in Biotechnology , 2008 .