Enhancing Socially Responsible Innovation in Industry: Practical Use for Considerations of Social and Ethical Aspects in Industrial Life Science & Technology

The aim of the study presented in this thesis is to explore to what extent corporate researchers in the field of industrial Life Science & Technology (LST) can consider social and ethical aspects of LST innovation to improve their Research and Development (R&D) practices. Innovators, particularly those working in controversial scientific and technology fields such as industrial LST, are encouraged to adopt socially responsible innovation methods. This requires that researchers, who work in such fields, consider the broader social and ethical context of their R&D activities. This thesis explores first how corporate researchers can integrate such aspects in their daily work and how this could improve their work. Second it investigates whether such integration leads to a quantitatively assessable improvement of the quality of R&D work. The results indicate that integration is possible, and leads to a measurable improvement of the quality of R&D work. In addition, researchers see a number of improvements in their R&D work, e.g. in the quality of communication and cooperation, and how to link their own work to corporate strategies and marketing. This thesis can be useful for innovators who wish to enhance socially responsible innovation practices, as it presents a tool that allows for the operationalisation of socially responsible innovation for R&D management and improved R&D performance.

[1]  Benjamin S. Halpern,et al.  The Engaged University: Providing a Platform for Research That Transforms Society , 2010 .

[2]  Neville Craddock Flies in the soup—European GM labeling legislation , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Steve Strand,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition , 2006 .

[4]  W. S. Lyon Social studies of science and us. I. , 1984 .

[5]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[6]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  The transformation of technological regimes , 2003 .

[7]  Jane Calvert,et al.  The role of social scientists in synthetic biology , 2009, EMBO reports.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[9]  R. Narula R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[10]  Daan Schuurbiers,et al.  Erratum to: What Happens in the Lab Does Not Stay in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[11]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[12]  J. Durant Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science , 1999 .

[13]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Biotechnology in the years of controversy: a social scientific perspective , 2001 .

[14]  George Cheney,et al.  Talking ‘facts’: identity and rationality in industry perspectives on genetic modification , 2007 .

[15]  A. Faaij,et al.  Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications , 2008 .

[16]  P. Osseweijer,et al.  Genomics in Industry: issues of a bio-based economy , 2010, Genomics, society, and policy.

[17]  D. Schuurbiers Social Responsibility in Research Practice: Engaging applied scientists with the socio-ethical context of their work , 2010 .

[18]  Jack Stilgoe,et al.  The Public Value of Science: Or How to Ensure That Science Really Matters , 2005 .

[19]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry , 2007 .

[20]  Neelke Doorn,et al.  Responsibility in Engineering: Toward a New Role for Engineering Ethicists , 2010 .

[21]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[22]  K. Davies,et al.  Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  Sally Randles,et al.  From Nano‐Ethicswash to Real‐Time Regulation , 2008 .

[24]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Conceptualising social impacts , 2002 .

[25]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis , 2008 .

[26]  R. Karsh The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution , 1961 .

[27]  Mark Bovens,et al.  The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations , 1998 .

[28]  Annemiek Nelis,et al.  Societal dialogue needs more than public engagement , 2009, EMBO reports.

[29]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[30]  Tsjalling Swierstra,et al.  Responsibility without Moralism in Technoscientific Design Practice , 2006 .

[31]  Amy J. Burgin,et al.  Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society , 2010 .

[32]  P. Galison Refections on Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics , 1999, Perspectives on Science.

[33]  J. Suomala,et al.  Framework to study the social innovation networks , 2006 .

[34]  Tsjalling Swierstra,et al.  Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies , 2011, Nanoethics.

[35]  W. J. Vrakking,et al.  Success and failure of 50 innovation projects in Dutch companies , 2000 .

[36]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures , 1995 .

[37]  Richard Owen,et al.  Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  Linda A. Hall,et al.  A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry , 2002 .

[39]  F.T.J.M. Fortuin,et al.  The Dynamics of the Strategic Network Relations between Corporate R&D and Business. A Longitudinal Analysis in a Large, Technology Based Multinational Company , 2007 .

[40]  J K Nanson,et al.  'This won't hurt a bit'. , 1999, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[41]  Simone van der Burg,et al.  Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice , 2009 .

[42]  Steven M. Flipse,et al.  Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[43]  C. Shelley-Egan,et al.  The Ambivalence of Promising Technology , 2010, Nanoethics.

[44]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.

[45]  J. Ravetz,et al.  The post-normal science of precaution , 2004 .

[46]  Audley Genus Rethinking constructive technology assessment as democratic, reflective, discourse , 2006 .

[47]  A. Rip,et al.  Narrative Infrastructure in Product Creation Processes , 2000 .

[48]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Trading zones and interactional expertise , 2007 .

[49]  Matthias Kaiser Commentary: looking for conflict and finding none? , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[50]  A. J. Koops,et al.  The biobased economy : biofuels, materials and chemicals in the post-oil era , 2010 .

[51]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  On the Role of Outsiders in Technical Development , 2000 .

[52]  Steven M. Flipse,et al.  Setting Up Spaces for Collaboration in Industry Between Researchers from the Natural and Social Sciences , 2014, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[53]  Neelke Doorn,et al.  Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives , 2009, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[54]  Andrew Webster,et al.  Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room , 2007 .

[55]  Sarah R. Davies,et al.  Constructing Communication , 2008 .

[56]  Steven S. Vickner,et al.  Media Coverage of Biotech Foods and Influence on Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[57]  N. Doorn Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development (R&D) , 2012 .

[58]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[59]  M. Lengwiler Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology , 2008 .

[60]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Moral Imagination, Trading Zones, and the Role of the Ethicist in Nanotechnology , 2009 .

[61]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms , 2004 .

[62]  J. H. Jensen,et al.  The social aspects of food biotechnology: a European view. , 1999, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[63]  P. Osseweijer A Short History of Talking Biotech : Fifteen years of iterative action research in institutionalising scientists' engagement in public communication , 2006 .

[64]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Conceptualizing Innovation Orientation: A Framework for Study and Integration of Innovation Research* , 2006 .

[65]  Shannon N. Conley Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-Technical Integration , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[66]  J. Bessant,et al.  Innovation Management Measurement: A Review , 2006 .

[67]  Simone van der Burg,et al.  Imagining the Future of Photoacoustic Mammography , 2009, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[68]  Arie Rip,et al.  Futures of ELSA , 2009, EMBO reports.

[69]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[70]  Colin Macilwain,et al.  Genetics: Watching science at work , 2009, Nature.

[71]  Directorate Energy Energy research in the 7th framework programme , 2007 .

[72]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Turning Good into Gold: A Comparative Study of Two Environmental Invention Networks , 2002 .

[73]  Deborah G. Johnson Ethics and Technology ‘in the Making’: An Essay on the Challenge of Nanoethics , 2007 .

[74]  François Thoreau The ‘interpretive flexibility’ of nanotechnologies in context: the case of a leading R&D center in Flanders, Belgium , 2010 .

[75]  Arie Rip,et al.  Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology , 2007 .

[76]  Juliana Hsuan,et al.  Outsourcing R&D: A Review, Model, and Research Agenda , 2010 .

[77]  S.W.F. Omta,et al.  Identifying key performance indicators in food technology contract R&D , 2013 .

[78]  Irwin Weiser,et al.  Going Public: What Writing Programs Learn from Engagement , 2010 .

[79]  Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al.  Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resource Issues , 2004 .

[80]  S. Arduino,et al.  Contamination of Community Potable Water from Land Grabbing: A Case Study from Rural Tanzania , 2012 .

[81]  John L. Campbell Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[82]  Eleonore Pauwels,et al.  The Value of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to Sustainability Research: A Critical Approach Toward Synthetic Biology Promises , 2011 .

[83]  Arie Rip,et al.  Mind the gap revisited. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[84]  Dan Marsh,et al.  UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO Hamilton New Zealand Does New Zealand have an Innovation System for Biotechnology? , 2002 .

[85]  F.T.J.M. Fortuin,et al.  Facing the global Challange to raise the innovation power of the agrifoog companies. Creating an innovation assessment tool , 2009 .

[86]  S. Omta,et al.  Innovation drivers and barriers in food processing , 2009 .

[87]  Toni Ahlqvist,et al.  Integrating future-oriented technology analysis and risk assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[88]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[89]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[90]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Lab‐scale intervention , 2009, EMBO reports.

[91]  Ellen H.M. Moors,et al.  User producer interaction in context , 2012 .

[92]  Audley Genus,et al.  On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[93]  Roop L. Mahajan,et al.  Embedding the humanities in engineering: Art, dialogue, and a laboratory , 2010 .

[94]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods, 4th Edition , 2012 .

[95]  B. Penders,et al.  The Social Study of Corporate Science: A Research Manifesto , 2009 .

[96]  Debasmita Patra,et al.  Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration into the Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA , 2011 .

[97]  Julian D Marshall,et al.  Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[98]  A. Rip A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance - and its ironies , 2006 .

[99]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[100]  B. Penders,et al.  Credibility Engineering in the Food Industry: Linking Science, Regulation, and Marketing in a Corporate Context , 2011, Science in Context.

[101]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[102]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Attention Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate , 2006 .

[103]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: The evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture , 2011 .

[104]  Luk Van Langenhove,et al.  Integration of Technology Assessment in R&D Management Practices , 1998 .

[105]  H. Nowotny Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .

[106]  P. Thomas The devil is in the detql: revealing the social and political processes of technology management , 1996 .

[107]  Rutger O. van Merkerk,et al.  Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies , 2008 .

[108]  Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes,et al.  Mass media framing of biotechnology news , 2007 .

[109]  J. Hollander Improving performance in business development , 2002 .

[110]  Roland Jackson,et al.  Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues , 2005 .

[111]  P. Osseweijer,et al.  Media attention to GM food cases: An innovation perspective , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[112]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers , 2003 .

[113]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Biotechnology - the Making of a Global Controversy , 2002 .

[114]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed , 1973 .

[115]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[116]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[117]  Ruud Smits,et al.  In search of relevance: The changing contract between science and society , 2009 .

[118]  Henk Verhoog The responsibilities of scientists , 1981 .

[119]  News coverage of biotechnology debates , 2003 .

[120]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Essentials of Corporate Communication: Implementing Practices for Effective Reputation Management , 2007 .

[121]  Jason Chilvers Engaging Research Councils? An evaluation of a Nanodialogues experiment in upstream public engagement , 2005 .

[122]  A. Rip,et al.  Users and unicorns: a discussion of mythical beasts in interactive science , 2000 .

[123]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Legislating the laboratory? Promotion and precaution in a nanomaterials company. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[124]  Roland Clift,et al.  Industrial constructions of publics and public knowledge: a qualitative investigation of practice in the UK chemicals industry , 2007 .

[125]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Measuring innovation in long product development cycle industries: an insight in biotechnology , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[126]  Paul Trott,et al.  Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing , 2006 .

[127]  B. S. Piachaud,et al.  Outsourcing in the pharmaceutical manufacturing process: an examination of the CRO experience , 2002 .

[128]  Joseph Z. Shyu,et al.  Policy tools on the formation of new biotechnology firms in Taiwan , 2005 .

[129]  Seth Pettie,et al.  Mind the gap , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[130]  Yanuar Nugroho,et al.  Mapping issues and envisaging futures: An evolutionary scenario approach , 2012 .

[131]  Michael Davis,et al.  Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[132]  B. Penders From seeking health to finding healths : the politics of large-scale cooperation in nutrition science , 2008 .

[133]  E. Huizingh Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[134]  Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al.  Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what? , 2011 .

[135]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[136]  Michael S. Carolan,et al.  The Precautionary Principle and Traditional Risk Assessment , 2007 .

[137]  D. Hine,et al.  Harmonizing science and business agendas for growth in new biotechnology firms: Case comparisons from five countries , 2007 .

[138]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[139]  James Wilsdon,et al.  See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .

[140]  Roop L. Mahajan,et al.  MIDSTREAM MODULATION OF NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH IN AN ACADEMIC LABORATORY , 2006 .

[141]  S.W.F. Omta,et al.  Factors related to innovative output in the Dutch agrifood industry , 2006 .

[142]  J. Chuck Hypothetical biotechnology companies: A role‐playing student centered activity for undergraduate science students , 2011, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[143]  Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen,et al.  An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry , 2007 .

[144]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Editorial Overview - Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom? , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[145]  Brian Sager,et al.  Scenarios on the future of biotechnology , 2001 .

[146]  F. Wickson,et al.  Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology , 2011 .

[147]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Is cell science dangerous? , 2007, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[148]  S.W.F. Omta,et al.  Key Success Factors of Innovation in Multinational Agrifood Prospector Companies , 2007 .

[149]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets , 2001 .

[150]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[151]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Technology Assessment in Social Context: The case for a new framework for assessing and shaping technological developments , 2010 .

[152]  S. Duvail,et al.  Land and water grabbing in an east african coastal wetland : the case of the Tana delta , 2012 .

[153]  H. Kaiser An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[154]  Boaz Bernstein,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Toward Developing an Integrated Innovation Model for Biotech Firms , 2006, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[155]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  THE INVISIBLE SUCCESS FACTORS IN PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1999 .

[156]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[157]  Arie Rip,et al.  Interactive Technology Assessment in the Real World , 2008 .

[158]  R. V. Schomberg Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .

[159]  R. Bennett,et al.  Inequality and GM Crops: A Case-Study of Bt Cotton in India , 2007 .

[160]  Bart Penders,et al.  Sensitization: reciprocity and reflection in scientific practice , 2009, EMBO reports.

[161]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[162]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[163]  M. Bucchi,et al.  Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions , 2011 .

[164]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[165]  L. A. Marks,et al.  MEDIA COVERAGE OF AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY: DID THE BUTTERFLY HAVE AN EFFECT? , 2003 .

[166]  The Sociology of Intellectual Life: The Career of the Mind in and Around Academy , 2010 .

[167]  A. Nordmann If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics , 2007, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[168]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[169]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[170]  Steven M. Flipse,et al.  The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[171]  P. Stegmaier,et al.  The rock ‘n’ roll of knowledge co‐production , 2009, EMBO reports.

[172]  D. Collingridge The social control of technology , 1980 .

[173]  L. Louw,et al.  A framework for managing the innovation process , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[174]  S. Omta,et al.  Can Premium Brand Beat Private label Innovation? Comparing Premium Brand and Private label Innovation Projects in a Food Processing Company. , 2010 .

[175]  John Grin,et al.  Technology Assessment as Learning , 1996 .

[176]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[177]  Rosalyn W Berne,et al.  Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology , 2004, Science and engineering ethics.

[178]  Frans J. Meijman,et al.  Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches , 2008 .

[179]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions , 2007 .

[180]  H. Zwart Biotechnology and naturalness in the genomics era: plotting a timetable for the biotechnology debate , 2009 .

[181]  R. Shields Hope and Fear in Biotechnology , 2008 .