Adding Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research to Health Intervention Studies

The purpose of this article is to explain how to improve intervention designs, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in health science research using a process philosophy and theory known as dialectical pluralism (DP). DP views reality as plural and uses dialectical, dialogical, and hermeneutical approaches to knowledge construction. Using DP and its “both/and” logic, and its attempt to produce new creative syntheses, researchers on heterogeneous teams can better dialogue with qualitative and mixed methods approaches, concepts, paradigms, methodologies, and methods to improve their intervention research studies. The concept of reflexivity is utilized but is expanded when it is a component of DP. Examples of strategies for identifying, inviting, and creating divergence and integrative strategies for producing strong mixed methods intervention studies are provided and illustrated using real-life examples.

[1]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Mixed Methods Intervention Trials , 2009 .

[2]  A. Ammerman,et al.  Practice-based evidence in public health: improving reach, relevance, and results. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[3]  Joachim Blatter,et al.  Designing case studies : explanatory approaches in small-n research , 2012 .

[4]  H. White.  The Use of Mixed Methods in Randomized Control Trials , 2013 .

[5]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .

[6]  J. Torney-Purta.  International psychological research that matters for policy and practice. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[7]  B. Thompson,et al.  Mammogram screening in Chile: using mixed methods to implement health policy planning at the primary care level. , 2011, Breast.

[8]  J. Bryce,et al.  Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[9]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  The Validity Issue in Mixed Research , 2006 .

[10]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2014 .

[11]  Martin White,et al.  Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618] , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[12]  R. Burke Johnson,et al.  Research Methods, Design, and Analysis; 12th Edition, Global Edition , 2015 .

[13]  P. Glewwe,et al.  Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test Scores in Kenya , 2007 .

[14]  Kurt Danziger,et al.  The Methodological Imperative in Psychology , 1985 .

[15]  R. Pill,et al.  Why do interventions work in some places and not others: a breastfeeding support group trial. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[16]  Tres Stefurak,et al.  Considering the Evidence‐and‐Credibility Discussion in Evaluation Through the Lens of Dialectical Pluralism , 2013 .

[17]  Rajiv Vaidyanathan,et al.  Dictionary of statistics and methodology : #a #nontechnical guide for the social sciences , 1994 .

[18]  Carolyn Turpin-Petrosino,et al.  Scared Straight and Other Juvenile Awareness Programs for Preventing Juvenile Delinquency: A Systematic Review , 2013 .

[19]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[20]  D. DeMets,et al.  Fundamentals of Clinical Trials , 1982 .

[21]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[22]  Sandra Mathison,et al.  Why Triangulate? , 1988 .

[23]  R. Burke Johnson,et al.  Dialectical Pluralism and Mixed Research , 2012 .

[24]  Jon Williamson,et al.  The evidence that evidence-based medicine omits. , 2013, Preventive medicine.

[25]  R. Burke Johnson,et al.  Dialectical Pluralism , 2017 .

[26]  R. Byng,et al.  Exposing the key functions of a complex intervention for shared care in mental health: case study of a process evaluation , 2008, BMC health services research.

[27]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review , 2013, BMJ Open.

[28]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[29]  Joachim Blatter,et al.  Designing Case Studies , 2012 .

[30]  Khaleel S Hussaini,et al.  Using Community-Based Participatory Mixed Methods Research to Understand Preconception Health in African American Communities of Arizona , 2013, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[31]  D. Elbourne,et al.  In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trials☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Focus on qualitative methods: Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. , 1996, Research in nursing & health.

[33]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[34]  Sharlene Hesse-Biber,et al.  Weaving a Multimethodology and Mixed Methods Praxis Into Randomized Control Trials to Enhance Credibility , 2012 .

[35]  D. Mertens.  Transformative Paradigm , 2007 .

[36]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Moving From Randomized Controlled Trials to Mixed Methods Intervention Evaluations , 2015 .

[38]  N. Weller,et al.  Finding Pathways: Mixed-Method Research for Studying Causal Mechanisms , 2014 .

[39]  G. Reed,et al.  Evidentiary Pluralism as a Strategy for Research and Evidence-Based Practice in Rehabilitation Psychology. , 2008, Rehabilitation psychology.