Comparative Assessment of Cytokines and Other Inflammatory Markers for the Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis–A Case Control Study

Objective Cytokines (IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α), sCD163, and C-reactive protein were serially measured in an attempt to identify a set of tests which can reliably confirm or refute the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis at an early stage. Methods One hundred neonates suspected to have sepsis on clinical grounds and who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. Based on the positive or negative blood culture reports they were classified as infected (n = 50) and non-infected (n = 50) neonates respectively. Fifty healthy neonates without any signs of sepsis were also included in the study as control group. The initial blood sample was taken on day 0 (at the time of sepsis evaluation) and two further samples were taken on days 1 and 2 for monitoring the clinical progress and response to treatment. In the control group the cord blood and 48 hours venous sample was collected. Plasma CRP (ng/ml), IL-6 (pg/ml), IL-8 (pg/ml), TNF-α (ng/ml) and sCD163 (ng/ml) were determined by double antibody method Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay in all the three blood samples. Results The cut of levels for CRP at >19,689 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 92%, for IL-6 at >95.32 pg/ml had a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 96%, for IL-8 at >70.86 pg/ml had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 70%, for sCD163 at >896.78 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 88% for the diagnosis of infection before antibiotics. TNF-α levels of >12.6 ng/ml showed 100% sensitivity and 72% specificity for the diagnosis of inflammation. Conclusion The most powerful predictor to differentiate between the non-infected and infected neonates before antibiotics was sCD163. The most powerful indicator for evaluation of prognosis is IL-6. sCD163 can be used alone to screen for sepsis in neonates before the results of blood culture are received.

[1]  M. Suma,et al.  CD163 and its expanding functional repertoire. , 2012, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[2]  A. Ihan,et al.  Neutrophil and Monocyte CD64 and CD163 Expression in Critically Ill Neonates and Children with Sepsis: Comparison of Fluorescence Intensities and Calculated Indexes , 2008, Mediators of inflammation.

[3]  A. Aygun,et al.  Serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α Levels in Early Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Sepsis , 2008, Mediators of inflammation.

[4]  S. Moestrup,et al.  Macrophage serum markers in pneumococcal bacteremia: Prediction of survival by soluble CD163* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[5]  B. Dilbaz,et al.  The value of cord blood interleukin-6 levels for predicting chorioamnionitis, funisitis and neonatal infection in term premature rupture of membranes. , 2006, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  M. Sánchez Luna,et al.  Procalcitonin is not sufficiently reliable to be the sole marker of neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin , 2006, BMC pediatrics.

[7]  P. Ng,et al.  Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis , 2006, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[8]  B. Davis,et al.  Human monocyte CD163 expression inversely correlates with soluble CD163 plasma levels , 2005, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[9]  P. Wallace,et al.  Endotoxin induces rapid metalloproteinase‐mediated shedding followed by up‐regulation of the monocyte hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 , 2002, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[10]  D. Isaacman,et al.  Utility of the serum C-reactive protein for detection of occult bacterial infection in children. , 2002, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[11]  L. Vatten,et al.  Early diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis: comparing C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, soluble tumour necrosis factor receptors and soluble adhesion molecules. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  G. Steinbach,et al.  Interleukin‐8: a valuable tool to restrict antibiotic therapy in newborn infants , 2001, Acta paediatrica.

[13]  G. Rice,et al.  Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in newborn bacterial infection. , 2001, American journal of perinatology.

[14]  M. Krueger,et al.  Cord Blood Levels of Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 for the Immediate Diagnosis of Early-Onset Infection in Premature Infants , 2001, Neonatology.

[15]  R. Procianoy,et al.  Evaluation of interleukin‐6, tumour necrosis factor‐α and interleukin‐1β for early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis , 1999 .

[16]  T F Fok,et al.  Diagnosis of late onset neonatal sepsis with cytokines, adhesion molecule, and C-reactive protein in preterm very low birthweight infants , 1997, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[17]  L. Pacifico,et al.  Interleukin 6 in neonates with early and late onset infection. , 1997, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[18]  P. Bartmann,et al.  INTERLEUKIN‐6: A SENSITIVE PARAMETER FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF NEONATAL BACTERIAL INFECTION: 480 , 1997 .

[19]  U. Simeoni,et al.  Evaluation of interleukin-6 and soluble receptors of tumor necrosis factor for early diagnosis of neonatal infection. , 1996, The Journal of pediatrics.

[20]  C. R. Walker,et al.  Interleukin-6 Expression in Cord Blood of Patients with Clinical Chorioamnionitis , 1996, Pediatric Research.

[21]  H. Stockhausen,et al.  Interleukin‐6 and soluble interleukin‐6 receptor in cord blood in the diagnosis of early onset sepsis in neonates , 1995, Acta paediatrica.

[22]  B. Stoll,et al.  Neonatal sepsis: a major global public health challenge. , 2009, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[23]  Michael L Wilson,et al.  Principles and procedures for blood cultures : approved guideline , 2007 .

[24]  T. Fok,et al.  Editor's Focus , 2007, Pediatric Research.

[25]  J. Zuwała-Jagiełło Haemoglobin scavenger receptor: function in relation to disease. , 2006, Acta biochimica Polonica.

[26]  R. C. Silveira,et al.  Evaluation of interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta for early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. , 1999, Acta paediatrica.