Depth cue interaction in telepresence and simulated telemanipulation

Virtual environment displays can show realistic scenes that include a wide variety of visual depth cues. This realism may also elicit telepresence, or the feeling by the viewer that he or she is actually present in the distant or virtual world. For applications such as telerobotics, realistic representations of the remote site may improve task performance. However, timing demands and hardware power may limit the realism that can be achieved. Thus, it is necessary to consider how telepresence affects the operator's task performance. Increasing telepresence may only asymptotically improve performance because of the adaptability of the human operator. In our present experiments, we examined the contribution of two important depth cues, occlusion and disparity, on the performance of a simulated telerobotic task. We have simulated a three-axis tracking task that is viewed under four different levels of realism. We hoped to determine if the combined presentation of the depth cues has a more beneficial effect on performance than either depth cue presented singularly. Results showed similar performance improvements with the presentation of occlusion or disparity individually. When both cues were present together, a somewhat larger performance improvement was measured.

[1]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion, and velocity gradients , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Interaction of visual depth cues and viewing parameters during simulated telemanipulation , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Visual enhancements in pick-and-place tasks: Human operators controlling a simulated cylindrical manipulator , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulations with consideration of manipulator system dynamics , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  S. McKee,et al.  Steroscopic acuity for moving retinal images. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  Stanley N. Roscoe,et al.  The eyes prefer real images , 1991 .

[7]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[8]  John M. Foley,et al.  Stereoscopic distance perception , 1991 .

[9]  Katsuya Matsunaga,et al.  A helmet mounted display for telerobotics , 1988, Digest of Papers. COMPCON Spring 88 Thirty-Third IEEE Computer Society International Conference.

[10]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.