Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?

Abstract In this study, four different patterns of teacher feedback were given to foreign language students producing a first draft (D1), a second draft (D2), and a final version (D3) of a single composition. The pattern usually recommended within a process writing approach of content-focussed feedback on D1 followed by form-focussed feedback on D2 was compared with the reverse pattern, another pattern in which form and content feedback were mixed at both stages, and a control pattern of zero feedback. It was found that the recommended pattern of feedback did not produce significantly different results from the other two patterns in which feedback was given in terms of gains in formal accuracy or in terms of content score gains between D1 and D3. A post-hoc analysis of changes made by students revealed that students may have relied heavily on form feedback and that content feedback had only a moderate effect on revision. Explanations for these findings are put forward and the implications for the classroom are drawn.

[1]  John S. Hedgcock,et al.  Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing , 1994 .

[2]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[3]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Second Language Writing: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response , 1990 .

[4]  N. Sommers.  Responding to Student Writing , 1982 .

[5]  T. Santos.  Professors' Reactions to the Academic Writing of Nonnative-Speaking Students. , 1988 .

[6]  D. Ferris.  THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[7]  J. Hedgcock,et al.  Teaching ESL composition : purpose, process, and practice , 2001 .

[8]  Ilona Leki.  THE PREFERENCES OF ESL STUDENTS FOR ERROR CORRECTION IN COLLEGE-LEVEL WRITING CLASSES , 1991 .

[9]  Dana Ferris,et al.  Methodology in Language Teaching: Teaching Students to Self-Edit , 2002 .

[10]  Ann K. Fathman,et al.  Second Language Writing: Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content , 1990 .

[11]  R. L. Allwright,et al.  Investigating Reformulation as a Practical Strategy for the Teaching of Academic Writing , 1988 .

[12]  Barbara Kroll.  Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom. , 1990 .

[13]  Liz Hamp-Lyons.  Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts , 1991 .

[14]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[15]  K. Bailey.  The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics , 1991 .

[16]  L. Corno,et al.  Effects on Second Language Learning of Variations in Written Feedback on Homework Assignments , 1981 .

[17]  S. Krashen.  Writing--Research, Theory, And Applications , 1984 .

[18]  C. Knoblauch,et al.  Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: The State of the Art. , 1981 .

[19]  Christine Goring. Kepner.  An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[20]  Ann Raimes,et al.  Techniques in teaching writing , 1983 .

[21]  Janet Lane,et al.  Writing Clearly: Responding to ESL Compositions. , 1993 .

[22]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Understanding ESL Writers , 1993 .

[23]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[24]  Cyril J. Weir,et al.  Communicative Language Testing , 1991 .

[25]  D. Ferris,et al.  Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications , 1997 .

[26]  George Hillocks,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. , 1986 .

[27]  B. P. Taylor,et al.  Content and Written Form: A Two-Way Street* , 1981 .

[28]  Vivian Zamel.  The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies , 1983 .

[29]  H. Jacobs.  Testing Esl Composition: A Practical Approach , 1981 .

[30]  A. Cohen,et al.  Second Language Writing: Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports , 1990 .

[31]  J. Truscott.  The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .

[32]  Vivian Zamel.  Responding to Student Writing , 1985 .

[33]  J. Swales,et al.  ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work , 1988 .

[34]  A. Wenden,et al.  Learner strategies in language learning , 1990 .

[35]  D. Ferris.  The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .

[36]  J. Connor-Linton.  Looking Behind the Curtain: What Do L2 Composition Ratings Really Mean? , 1995 .

[37]  Alistair Cumming.  Responding to the Writing of ESL Students. , 1985 .

[38]  D. Ferris.  Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms* , 1995 .