Digital photodensitometry: a reliable and accessible method for measuring bone density

Taphonomic analyses are frequently reliant on bone structural density data, which are used as a proxy measure of bone strength. Methods used to obtain these data are often either destructive, or expensive. Consequently the data available tend to be based on only a small number of animals. A method that can measure the bone density of a large number of animals at a comparatively low cost is therefore desirable. This paper sets out such a method, based on photodensitometry. Bones are radiographed, the images are converted into digital files, standardised, and their optical density measured. These data are combined with metrical information to produce a measurement that relates to a specimen's bone density. The method is shown to be repeatable and comparable to (or perhaps better than) Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) in terms of accuracy. It also does not suffer from the methodological problems regarding the cross-sectional area of the specimen that are associated with DEXA. Density data produced by the method described here have successfully been used in a taphonomic analysis of the faunal assemblage from the site of Catalhoyuk, Turkey, shedding light on the use of different types of space by the ancient inhabitants of the site. The same data have cast doubt on the common assumption that the bone density of modern animals can act as an analogue for that of archaeological animals.

[1]  R. Lyman,et al.  The effect of structural density on Marmot skeletal part representation in archaeological sites , 1992 .

[2]  John D. Currey,et al.  The Mechanical Adaptations of Bones , 1984 .

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[4]  P. Stahl.  Structural Density of Domesticated South American Camelid Skeletal Elements and the Archaeological Investigation of Prehistoric Andean Ch'arki , 1999 .

[5]  L. Kreutzer.  Bison and deer bone mineral densities: Comparisons and implications for the interpretation of archaeological faunas , 1992 .

[6]  P. Munson.  Age-correlated Differential Destruction of Bones and its Effect on Archaeological Mortality Profiles of Domestic Sheep and Goats , 2000 .

[7]  V. Butler,et al.  The role of bone density in structuring prehistoric salmon bone assemblages , 1994 .

[8]  S. Payne.  Kill-off Patterns in Sheep and Goats: the Mandibles from Aşvan Kale , 1973, Anatolian Studies.

[9]  F. Dirrigl.  Bone Mineral Density of Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) Skeletal Elements and its Effect on Differential Survivorship , 2001 .

[10]  Y. Yeni,et al.  The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. , 1997, Bone.

[11]  E. Ioannidou.  Taphonomy of Animal Bones: Species, Sex, Age and Breed Variability of Sheep, Cattle and Pig Bone Density , 2003 .

[12]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Plow-zone Zooarchaeology: Fragmentation and Identifiability , 1987 .

[13]  K. Carlson,et al.  Baboon Bone Mineral Densities: Implications for the Taphonomy of Primate Skeletons in South African Cave Sites , 2002 .

[14]  P. Stahl,et al.  Structural density assays of leporid skeletal elements with implications for taphonomic, actualistic and archaeological research , 1999 .

[15]  Isabel Cruz,et al.  Structural Bone Density of the Lesser Rhea (Pterocnemia pennata) (Aves: Rheidae). Taphonomic and Archaeological Implications , 2003 .

[16]  L. Snyder,et al.  Bone mineral density and survival of elements and element portions in the bones of the Crow Creek massacre victims. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  R. Lyman,et al.  Bone Density and Differential Survivorship of Fossil Classes , 1984 .

[18]  Robert D. Speller,et al.  Measuring Bone Mineral Density in Archaeological Bone using Energy Dispersive Low Angle X-Ray Scattering Techniques , 1997 .

[19]  A. Behrensmeyer.  The taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate assemblages east of Lake Rudolf, Kenya , 1975 .

[20]  A. Behrensmeyer,et al.  Hominid taphonomy: transport of human skeletal parts in an artificial fluviatile environment. , 1976, American journal of physical anthropology.

[21]  O. Pearson,et al.  Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record , 1999, American Antiquity.

[22]  E. Ioannidou.  Taphonomic and methodological problems of interpreting animal bones from archaeological sites : their application on bone assemblages from Greece and England , 1999 .

[23]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[24]  D. Elkin.  Volume density of South American camelid skeletal parts , 1995 .

[25]  C. K. Brain.  The contribution of Namib desert Hottentots to an understanding of australopithecine bone accumulations , 1969 .

[26]  T. O'Connor.  Biosphere to Lithosphere: new studies in vertebrate taphonomy , 2005 .