Estimating cut points: A simple method for new wearables.

UNLABELLED Wearable technology is readily available for continuous assessment due to a growing number of commercial devices with increased data capture capabilities. However, many commercial devices fail to support suitable parameters (cut points) derived from the literature to help quantify physical activity (PA) due to differences in manufacturing. A simple metric to estimate cut points for new wearables is needed to aid data analysis. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate a simple methodology to determine cut points based on ratios between sedentary behaviour (SB) and PA intensities for a new wrist worn device (PRO-Diary™) by comparing its output to a validated and well characterised 'gold standard' (ActiGraph™). STUDY DESIGN Twelve participants completed a semi-structured (four-phase) treadmill protocol encompassing SB and three PA intensity levels (light, moderate, vigorous). The outputs of the devices were compared accounting for relative intensity. RESULTS Count ratios (6.31, 7.68, 4.63, 3.96) were calculated to successfully determine cut-points for the new wrist worn wearable technology during SB (0-426) as well as light (427-803), moderate (804-2085) and vigorous (≥ 2086) activities, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings should be utilised as a primary reference for investigations seeking to use new (wrist worn) wearable technology similar to that used here (i.e., PRO-Diary™) for the purposes of quantifying SB and PA intensities. The utility of count ratios may be useful in comparing devices or SB/PA values estimated across different studies. However, a more robust examination is required for different devices, attachment locations and on larger/diverse cohorts.

[1]  Gautier Zunquin,et al.  Equivalence of accelerometer data for walking and running: Treadmill versus on land , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  I-Min Lee,et al.  Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[3]  P. Ekkekakis Please Scroll down for Article International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology the Dual-mode Theory of Affective Responses to Exercise in Metatheoretical Context: I. Initial Impetus, Basic Postulates, and Philosophical Framework , 2022 .

[4]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Everything you wanted to know about selecting the "right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  S. Intille,et al.  Momentary Assessment of Adults’ Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Feasibility and Validity , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[6]  M. C. Ashe,et al.  Accelerometry analysis of physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review and data analysis , 2013, European Review of Aging and Physical Activity.

[7]  P. Hendrick,et al.  Construct validity of RT3 accelerometer: a comparison of level-ground and treadmill walking at self-selected speeds. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Bernd W. Becker The Quantified Self: Balancing Privacy and Personal Metrics , 2014 .

[9]  S. Trost,et al.  Evaluating the Responsiveness of Accelerometry to Detect Change in Physical Activity , 2014, Measurement in physical education and exercise science.

[10]  Mark S Tremblay,et al.  Physical activity and inactivity profiling: the next generation. , 2007, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[11]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[12]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment. , 2008, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[13]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  S. Shiffman,et al.  20. Ecological Momentary Assessment , 2013 .

[15]  Patty Freedson,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for children. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.