Semiautomatic segmentation of liver metastases on volumetric CT images.

PURPOSE Accurate segmentation and quantification of liver metastases on CT images are critical to surgery/radiation treatment planning and therapy response assessment. To date, there are no reliable methods to perform such segmentation automatically. In this work, the authors present a method for semiautomatic delineation of liver metastases on contrast-enhanced volumetric CT images. METHODS The first step is to manually place a seed region-of-interest (ROI) in the lesion on an image. This ROI will (1) serve as an internal marker and (2) assist in automatically identifying an external marker. With these two markers, lesion contour on the image can be accurately delineated using traditional watershed transformation. Density information will then be extracted from the segmented 2D lesion and help determine the 3D connected object that is a candidate of the lesion volume. The authors have developed a robust strategy to automatically determine internal and external markers for marker-controlled watershed segmentation. By manually placing a seed region-of-interest in the lesion to be delineated on a reference image, the method can automatically determine dual threshold values to approximately separate the lesion from its surrounding structures and refine the thresholds from the segmented lesion for the accurate segmentation of the lesion volume. This method was applied to 69 liver metastases (1.1-10.3 cm in diameter) from a total of 15 patients. An independent radiologist manually delineated all lesions and the resultant lesion volumes served as the "gold standard" for validation of the method's accuracy. RESULTS The algorithm received a median overlap, overestimation ratio, and underestimation ratio of 82.3%, 6.0%, and 11.5%, respectively, and a median average boundary distance of 1.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results have shown that volumes of liver metastases on contrast-enhanced CT images can be accurately estimated by a semiautomatic segmentation method.

[1]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[2]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  E. Fishman,et al.  Automatic liver segmentation technique for three-dimensional visualization of CT data. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  G. Marchal,et al.  Evaluation of manual vs semi-automated delineation of liver lesions on CT images , 1997, European Radiology.

[7]  Marc Jaeger,et al.  Advanced 3D image processing techniques for liver and hepatic tumor location and volumetry , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  The Watershed Transform: Definitions, Algorithms and Parallelization Strategies , 2000, Fundam. Informaticae.

[9]  Kil-Houm Park,et al.  Automatic Liver Tumor Detection from CT , 2001 .

[10]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  B. Davidson,et al.  Strategies to Increase the Resectability of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer , 2003, Digestive Surgery.

[12]  Juan Ruiz-Alzola,et al.  Comments on: A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images , 2004, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[13]  T. Desser,et al.  Automatic detection and classification of hypodense hepatic lesions on contrast-enhanced venous-phase CT. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Marker-controlled watershed for lymphoma segmentation in sequential CT images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[15]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Shape-Constraint Region Growing for Delineation of Hepatic Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomograph Scans , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[16]  I. Steffen,et al.  Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[17]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.