A new method for determining the equivalent permeability of a cleat dominated coal sample

A simplified flow model, rather than a complex geological model, is usually used for yield prediction and history matching in petroleum industry. The gap between these two models is often bridged in practice by upscaling. Equivalent permeability is an extremely significant parameter for upscaling a coal geological model. However, how to obtain an accurate equivalent permeability is still a scientific challenge because of the unique characteristics of coal samples (e.g. complicated cleat networks and extremely low matrix permeability). In this paper, three existing traditional mean methods, which are widely applied for calculating the equivalent permeability of conventional oil and gas reservoirs, are firstly tested with a random distributed permeability model and compared with finite element method-based numerical analysis to evaluate their potential applicability in various cases. Then, based on the streamline method and the flow-based upscaling technique, a new empirical formula is proposed with statistical algorithm to determine the equivalent permeability of naturally fractured coal samples and verified with numerical analysis of three different coal samples. Finally, the proposed formula is applied to provide the coal permeability of subsections for further finite element analysis of the complicated fluid flow behaviours in a coal block of Guluguba well 2 in Surat basin, Australia. The related application results demonstrated the usefulness of the proposed method.

[1]  L. Connell,et al.  Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: A review of analytical models and testing data , 2012 .

[2]  P. King The use of renormalization for calculating effective permeability , 1989 .

[3]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Permeability evolution in fractured coal — Combining triaxial confinement with X-ray computed tomography, acoustic emission and ultrasonic techniques , 2014 .

[4]  S. Paul,et al.  Determination of in-situ stress direction from cleat orientation mapping for coal bed methane exploration in south-eastern part of Jharia coalfield, India , 2011 .

[5]  G. Dagan Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: 2. The solute transport , 1982 .

[6]  Anthony R. Kovscek,et al.  CT Imaging of Low-Permeability, Dual-Porosity Systems Using High X-ray Contrast Gas , 2013, Transport in Porous Media.

[7]  Yan Liu,et al.  Recent development in numerical simulation of enhanced geothermal reservoirs , 2015, Journal of Earth Science.

[8]  G. Dagan Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: 1. Conditional simulation and the direct problem , 1982 .

[9]  H. Xing Finite element simulation of transient geothermal flow in extremely heterogeneous fractured porous media , 2014 .

[10]  T. Ren,et al.  Improved apparent permeability models of gas flow in coal with Klinkenberg effect , 2014 .

[11]  Klaus Regenauer-Lieb,et al.  From characterisation of pore-structures to simulations of pore-scale fluid flow and the upscaling of permeability using microtomography: A case study of heterogeneous carbonates , 2014 .

[12]  M. Widera Lignite cleat studies from the first Middle-Polish (first Lusatian) lignite seam in central Poland , 2014 .

[13]  Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis,et al.  The coal cleat system: A new approach to its study , 2014 .

[14]  J. R. Kyte,et al.  New Pseudo Functions To Control Numerical Dispersion , 1975 .

[15]  H. Xing,et al.  Fluid focusing and its link to vertical morphological zonation at the Dajishan vein-type tungsten deposit, South China , 2014 .

[16]  Joan Esterle,et al.  Controls on coal cleat spacing , 2010 .

[17]  L. K. Thomas,et al.  Reservoir Characterization of Ekofisk Field: A Giant, Fractured Chalk Reservoir in the Norwegian North Sea—History Match , 2000 .

[18]  Victor Rudolph,et al.  An improved permeability model of coal for coalbed methane recovery and CO2 geosequestration , 2009 .

[19]  J. Olson,et al.  Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review , 1998 .

[20]  L. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal matrix shrinkage, cleat compressibility and the geomechanical properties determining reservoir permeability , 2016 .

[21]  Peter R. King,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Shales on Reservoir Performance: Calculation of Effective Vertical Permeability , 1985 .

[22]  Y. Keehm,et al.  Permeability And Relative Permeability From Digital Rocks: Issues On Grid Resolution And Representative Elementary Volume , 2004 .

[23]  S. Laubach,et al.  Coal Fracture (Cleat) Patterns in Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico - Implications for Coalbed Methane Exploration and Development , 1991 .

[24]  H. Xing,et al.  Three dimensional finite element modeling of thermomechanical frictional contact between finite deformation bodies using R-minimum strategy , 2002 .

[25]  G. Rong,et al.  Permeability tensor and representative elementary volume of fractured rock masses , 2013, Hydrogeology Journal.

[26]  Philip Ringrose,et al.  Identifying the Representative Elementary Volume for Permeability in Heterolithic Deposits Using Numerical Rock Models , 2008 .

[27]  Barry Ryan,et al.  Cleat Development in Some British Columbia Coals , 2003 .

[28]  Tim Hesketh,et al.  An Analysis of Upscaling Techniques for Reservoir Simulation , 2005 .