Prior Robustness for Bayesian Implementation of the Fault Tree Analysis

We propose a prior robustness approach for the Bayesian implementation of the fault tree analysis (FTA). FTA is often used to evaluate risk in large, safety critical systems but has limitations due to its static structure. Bayesian approaches have been proposed as a superior alternative to it, however, this involves prior elicitation, which is not straightforward. We show that minor misspecification of priors for elementary events can result in a significant prior misspecification for the top event. A large amount of data is required to correctly update a misspecified prior and such data may not be available for many complex, safety critical systems. In such cases, prior misspecification equals posterior misspecification. Therefore, there is a need to develop a robustness approach for FTA, which can quantify the effects of prior misspecification on the posterior analysis. Here, we propose the first prior robustness approach specifically developed for FTA. We not only prove a few important mathematical properties of this approach, but also develop easy to use Monte Carlo sampling algorithms to implement this approach on any given fault tree with and and/or or gates. We then implement this Bayesian robustness approach on two real-life examples: a spacecraft re-entry example and a feeding control system example. We also provide a step-by-step illustration of how this approach can be applied to a real-life problem.

[1]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[2]  A. Müller,et al.  Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks , 2002 .

[3]  Michael A. West,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Applied Bayesian Analysis , 2010, Oxford Handbooks Online.

[4]  Stochastic Orders , 2008 .

[5]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[6]  Paolo Trucco,et al.  A Bayesian Belief Network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[8]  I. S. P. Daryle Niedermayer,et al.  An Introduction to Bayesian Networks and Their Contemporary Applications , 2008, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[9]  David Lindley,et al.  Reliability (and Fault Tree) Analysis Using Expert Opinions , 1986 .

[10]  Cristina De Persis,et al.  A risk assessment tool for highly energetic break-up events during the atmospheric re-entry , 2017 .

[11]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  David Ríos Insua,et al.  Robust Bayesian analysis , 2000 .

[13]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Eliciting Subjective Probabilities through Pair‐wise Comparisons , 2017 .

[14]  B. Liseo Bayesian Robustness , 2019, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.

[15]  J. P. Arias-Nicolás,et al.  New Classes of Priors Based on Stochastic Orders and Distortion Functions , 2016 .

[16]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  A. Irving Fault Tree Uncertainty Analysis Using a Monte Carlo Method , 1988 .

[18]  Thomas A. Mazzuchi,et al.  A paired comparison experiment for gathering expert judgment for an aircraft wiring risk assessment , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  E. Moreno Global Bayesian Robustness for Some Classes of Prior Distributions , 2000 .

[20]  F. Spizzichino Subjective Probability Models for Lifetimes , 2001 .