Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums: A Sociotechnical Approach

The term community is widely and often uncritically used to characterize groupings of people who meet in electronic forums (e-forums). The research reported here shows how the casual use of the term community to characterize these groups can actually undermine their transformation into forms of social organization that are justifiably characterized as communities. This article examines how transforming a group into a community is a major accomplishment that requires special processes and practices. Primary data come from a particular project, the Inquiry Learning Forum (ILF), that aimed to develop "communities of practice" (CoPs) among high school science and mathematics teachers through an elaborate dedicated web site. We examine participants' behaviors in some of the differently structured forums within the ILF web site. While the project's developers expected CoPs to develop autonomously, there was no evidence of CoP formation in open public online forums. The article contrasts two approaches to building online communities that differ sharply: "IT-led community development" and "IT-supported community development." The experience of the ILF project shows that IT-led strategies community development strategies are much more difficult to make workable than are the "IT-supported" strategies.

[1]  E. Shils,et al.  The Methodology Of The Social Sciences , 1949 .

[2]  G. A. Hillery.  Definitions of community : Areas of Agreement , 1955 .

[3]  F. Tönnies.  Community and Association , 1956 .

[4]  J. Little.  Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success , 1982 .

[5]  B. Anderson,et al.  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism , 1986 .

[6]  A. Cohen,et al.  The symbolic construction of community , 2013 .

[7]  A. Feenberg.  Network design: An operating manual for computer conferencing , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[8]  J. Little.  The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[9]  Liana Nan Graves.  Cooperative Learning Communities: Context for a New Vision of Education and Society , 1992 .

[10]  Nancy E. Ellis.  Collegiality from the Teacher's Perspective: Social Contexts for Professional Development , 1993 .

[11]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[12]  Shahaf Gal,et al.  Use of telecommunications for reflective discourse of science teacher leaders , 1994 .

[13]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[14]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Relationships in Electronic Forums: Hangouts, Salons, Workplaces, and Communities , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[15]  Elizabeth W. Morris.  Community in Theory and Practice: A Framework for Intellectual Renewal , 1996 .

[16]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Computer Conferencing and the On-Line Classroom , 1997 .

[17]  J. Hagel,et al.  Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1999 .

[18]  Lee Komito,et al.  The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[19]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Risk Mitigation in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[22]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[23]  Laura J. Miller.  Shopping for community: the transformation of the bookstore into a vital community institution , 1999 .

[24]  S. Bird.  Chatting on Cynthia's porch: Creating community in an e‐mail fan group , 1999 .

[25]  Ray Oldenburg,et al.  The Great Good Place , 1999 .

[26]  R. Oldenburg.  The Great Good Place , 1999 .

[27]  Lorraine Sherry.  The Nature and Purpose of Online Discourse: A Brief Synthesis of Current Research as related to The WEB Project , 2000 .

[28]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[29]  Amy Jo Kim,et al.  Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities , 2000 .

[30]  Miranda Mowbray,et al.  Online Communities: Commerce, Community, Action, and the Virtual University , 2000 .

[31]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Creating a “Connected” Community? Teachers’ Use of an Electronic Discussion Group , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[32]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[33]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[35]  Kathleen P. Fulton,et al.  The Role of Technology in Supporting Learning Communities , 2001 .

[36]  S. Brint.  Gemeinschaft Revisited: A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept* , 2001 .

[37]  Stuart Glogoff.  Virtual Connections: Community Bonding on the Net , 2001, First Monday.

[38]  Thomas Keating,et al.  Design and Implementation of an On-line Professional Development Community: A Project-Based Learning Approach in a Graduate Seminar , 2001 .

[39]  Andrew Feenberg,et al.  Community Technology and Democratic Rationalization , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[40]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community , 2004 .