Blind deconvolution in model-based iterative reconstruction for CT using a normalized sparsity measure

Model-based iterative reconstruction techniques for CT that include a description of the noise statistics and a physical forward model of the image formation process have proven to increase image quality for many applications. Specifically, including models of the system blur into the physical forward model and thus implicitly performing a deconvolution of the projections during tomographic reconstruction, could demonstrate distinct improvements, especially in terms of resolution. However, the results strongly rely on an exact characterization of all components contributing to the system blur. Such characterizations can be laborious and even a slight mismatch can diminish image quality significantly. Therefore, we introduce a novel objective function, which enables us to jointly estimate system blur parameters during tomographic reconstruction. Conventional objective functions are biased in terms of blur and can yield lowest cost to blurred reconstructions with low noise levels. A key feature of our objective function is a new normalized sparsity measure for CT based on total-variation regularization, constructed to be less biased in terms of blur. We outline a solving strategy for jointly recovering low-dimensional blur parameters during tomographic reconstruction. We perform an extensive simulation study, evaluating the performance of the regularization and the dependency of the different parts of the objective function on the blur parameters. Scenarios with different regularization strengths and system blurs are investigated, demonstrating that we can recover the blur parameter used for the simulations. The proposed strategy is validated and the dependency of the objective function with the number of iterations is analyzed. Finally, our approach is experimentally validated on test-bench data of a human wrist phantom, where the estimated blur parameter coincides well with visual inspection. Our findings are not restricted to attenuation-based CT and may facilitate the recovery of more complex imaging model parameters.

[1]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Blind deconvolution using a normalized sparsity measure , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[2]  P.J. La Riviere,et al.  Correction for Resolution Non-Uniformities Caused by Anode Angulation in Computed Tomography , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[3]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Total variation blind deconvolution , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Modeling for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Task-based detectability in CT image reconstruction by filtered backprojection and penalized likelihood estimation. , 2014, Medical physics.

[6]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Convex Programming , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  William Y. Song,et al.  Simultaneous deblurring and iterative reconstruction of CBCT for image guided brain radiosurgery , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Patrick J. La Rivière,et al.  Correction for Resolution Nonuniformities Caused by Anode Angulation in Computed Tomography , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Understanding Blind Deconvolution Algorithms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Incorporation of system resolution compensation (RC) in the ordered-subset transmission (OSTR) algorithm for transmission imaging in SPECT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[12]  E. Sidky,et al.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Daniele Perrone,et al.  Total Variation Blind Deconvolution: The Devil Is in the Details , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Dong Zeng,et al.  Regularization strategies in statistical image reconstruction of low‐dose x‐ray CT: A review , 2018, Medical physics.

[15]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Modeling Shift-Variant X-Ray Focal Spot Blur for High-Resolution Flat-Panel Cone-Beam CT. , 2016, Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography.

[16]  J. Webster Stayman,et al.  Penalized-Likelihood Reconstruction With High-Fidelity Measurement Models for High-Resolution Cone-Beam Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Patrick J. La Rivière,et al.  Penalized-likelihood sinogram restoration for computed tomography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Luo Ouyang,et al.  Noise correlation in CBCT projection data and its application for noise reduction in low-dose CBCT. , 2014, Medical physics.

[19]  J. Fessler,et al.  Modelling the physics in the iterative reconstruction for transmission computed tomography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[21]  J. Fessler,et al.  Maximum likelihood transmission image reconstruction for overlapping transmission beams , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[22]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for flat-panel cone-beam CT with focal spot blur, detector blur, and correlated noise. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  M. Salman,et al.  The Potential for Transmission of BCG from Orally Vaccinated White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to Cattle (Bos taurus) through a Contaminated Environment: Experimental Findings , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[25]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Does Iterative Reconstruction Lower CT Radiation Dose: Evaluation of 15,000 Examinations , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  J Wang,et al.  TH-A-18C-03: Noise Correlation in CBCT Projection Data and Its Application for Noise Reduction in Low-Dose CBCT. , 2014, Medical physics.

[27]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.