Performance in urban public transport systems: a critical analysis of the Portuguese case

Purpose - Services provided by urban public road passenger transport companies in Portugal are associated with widely differing economic and financial outcomes. The objective of this paper is to characterize these differences and discuss the potential contribution offered by the funding model implemented (including how the services provided are being subsidized). Design/methodology/approach - The data available in the management and financial reports published by the six existing Portuguese corporations whose main object is to provide a public road transport service were used to establish a set of performance indicators. The paper takes into account three dimensions: resource-efficiency, service-effectiveness and resource effectiveness. Findings - The comparative analysis implemented contributes crucially to an improved understanding of the current idiosyncrasies of urban public road transportation systems in Portugal, with a special emphasis on the productivity and performance results of different public management approaches. Originality/value - The originality of this paper arises from the case studies presented to support the debate on the influence of local vs central public funding approaches on Portugal's urban public road transport companies’ performance.

[1]  Xiaobai Angela Yao,et al.  Where are public transit needed - Examining potential demand for public transit for commuting trips , 2007, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  Marian Rizov,et al.  Is there a limit to agglomeration? Evidence from productivity of Dutch firms , 2012 .

[3]  K. Gwilliam.  A review of issues in transit economics , 2008 .

[4]  K. Lucas.  Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK , 2006 .

[5]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[6]  M. Karlaftis,et al.  OPERATING SUBSIDIES AND PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC TRANSIT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1998 .

[7]  B. Pashigian,et al.  Consequences and Causes of Public Ownership of Urban Transit Facilities , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Peter Tisato.  Service unreliability and bus subsidy , 1998 .

[9]  Eduardo Barata,et al.  Parking at the UC campus: Problems and solutions , 2011 .

[10]  J. Pucher.  URBAN PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC POLICIES. PART 2. PUBLIC TRANSPORT, OVERALL COMPARISONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 1995 .

[11]  David Banister,et al.  Travel reduction strategies: intentions and outcomes , 1997 .

[12]  Peter Tisato.  User Economies of Scale: Bus Subsidy in Adelaide* , 1997 .

[13]  R. Oldfield,et al.  The effects of public transport subsidies on demand and supply , 1986 .

[14]  Ola Hagring.  A further generalization of Tanner’s formula , 1998 .

[15]  Gautam Appa,et al.  Spatial aspects of traffic circulation: I. A review of alternative systems , 1995 .

[16]  Kofi Obeng.  Classification of bus transit policy variables , 1987 .

[17]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The economics of regulatory parking policies: the (im-)possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation , 1995 .

[18]  S. Proost,et al.  Optimal urban transport pricing in the presence of congestion, economies of density and costly public funds , 2008 .

[19]  Peter Kirchhoff,et al.  Public transit research and development in Germany , 1995 .

[20]  Bryan Dorsey,et al.  Mass transit trends and the role of unlimited access in transportation demand management , 2005 .

[21]  Gordon J. Fielding,et al.  Performance indicators for transit management , 1978 .

[22]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The dark side of making transit irresistible: The example of France , 2007 .

[23]  Anders Ljungberg,et al.  Public transport in towns - Inevitably on the decline? , 2008 .

[24]  Alan T. Murray.  Strategic analysis of public transport coverage , 2001 .

[25]  Rainald Borck,et al.  Subsidies for Intracity and Intercity Commuting , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Todd Litman.  Full cost accounting of urban transportation: implications and tools , 1997 .

[27]  K. Obeng,et al.  The Effects of Operating and Capital Subsidies on Total Factor Productivity: A Decomposition Approach , 2000 .

[28]  David Banister,et al.  Sustainable urban development and transport -a Eurovision for 2020 , 2000 .

[29]  G. Marsden.  The evidence base for parking policies—a review , 2006 .

[30]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  Subsidy and public transit performance: A factor analytic approach , 1997 .