Treating the chronic DUI offender "Turning Point" ten years later

Abstract Many different types of treatment have been implemented to treat the behavior of chronic drunk drivers. Of particular interest to policymakers have been the possible long-term effects of specific correctional interventions. The Turning Point Multiple DUI (driving under the influence) Treatment Program was designed to treat the chronic DUI offender. Previous analyses of the program, conducted by Langworthy and Latessa, revealed moderate to substantial treatment effects over one-year and four-year follow-up periods; although the treatment effect seemed to diminish in strength with the longer follow-up period. The current research presents the results of a ten-year follow-up outcome evaluation of the original “Turning Point” cohort and the original comparison group. The results indicate a stronger and more stable treatment effect than in the previous analysis. Implications for policy and program development were discussed.

[1]  E. Hanushek Statistical methods for social scientists , 1977 .

[2]  Edward J. Latessa,et al.  Treatment of chronic drunk drivers: A four-year follow-up of the turning point project , 1996 .

[3]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Effects of Ignition Interlock Devices on DUI Recidivism: Findings from a Longitudinal Study in Hamilton County, Ohio , 1992 .

[4]  Edward J. Latessa,et al.  TREATMENT OF CHRONIC DRUNK DRIVERS: THE TURNING POINT PROJECT , 1993 .

[5]  Paul Gendreau,et al.  Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s , 1987 .

[6]  James L. Nichols,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EDUCATION AND TREATMENT PROGRAMS FOR DRINKING DRIVERS. A DECADE OF EVALUATION , 1981 .

[7]  S. Menard Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[8]  R B Voas EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTROLLING THE DRUNK DRIVER , 1988 .

[9]  Hans C. Jessen,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[10]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  The comparative effectiveness of alcohol rehabilitation and licensing control actions for drunk driving offenders: A review of the literature , 1985 .

[11]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety , 1988 .

[12]  Evelyn Vingilis,et al.  A critical review on the effectiveness of drinking-driving rehabilitation programmes , 1983 .

[13]  Evelyn Vingilis,et al.  Comparison of age and sex characteristics of police-suspected impaired drivers and roadside-surveyed impaired drivers , 1982 .

[14]  John Reed,et al.  Final summary report , 1992 .

[15]  Franklin E. Zimring,et al.  Social control of the drinking driver , 1989 .

[16]  Robert D. Hoge,et al.  DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META-ANALYSIS * , 1990 .

[17]  A. James McKnight,et al.  Intervention in teenage drunk driving , 1986 .

[18]  Paul Gendreau,et al.  The principles of effective intervention with offenders. , 1996 .