Uterine contractile efficiency indexes for labor prediction: A bivariate approach from multichannel electrohysterographic records

Abstract Labor prediction is one of the most challenging goals in obstetrics, mainly due to the poor understanding of the factors responsible for the onset of labor. The electrohysterogram (EHG) is the recording of the myoelectrical activity of myometrial cells and has been shown to provide relevant information on the electrophysiological state of the uterus. This information could be used to obtain more accurate labor predictions than those of the currently used techniques, such as the Bishop score, tocography or biochemical markers. Indeed, a number of efforts have already been made to predict labor by this method, separately characterizing the intensity, the coupling degree of the EHG signals and myometrial cell excitability, these being the cornerstones on which contraction efficiency is built. Although EHG characterization can distinguish between different obstetric situations, the reported results have not been shown to provide a practical tool for the clinical detection of true labor. The aim of this work was thus to define and calculate indexes from multichannel EHG recordings related to all the phenomena involved in the efficiency of uterine myoelectrical activity (intensity, excitability and synchronization) and to combine them to form global efficiency indexes (GEI) able to predict delivery in less than 7/14 days. Four EHG synchronization indexes were assessed: linear correlation, the imaginary part of the coherence, phase synchronization and permutation cross mutual information. The results show that even though the synchronization and excitability efficiency indexes can detect increasing trends as labor approaches, they cannot predict labor in less than 7/14 days. However, intensity seems to be the main factor that contributes to myometrial efficiency and is able to predict labor in less than 7/14 days. All the GEIs present increasing monotonic trends as pregnancy advances and are able to identify (p

[1]  J. Terrien,et al.  Improving the classification rate of labor vs. normal pregnancy contractions by using EHG multichannel recordings , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[2]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  M. Hallett,et al.  Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  E. Hadar,et al.  Effect of an oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) on uterine electrical activity. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  W. Maner,et al.  Biophysical methods of prediction and prevention of preterm labor: uterine electromyography and cervical light-induced fluorescence – new obstetrical diagnostic techniques , 2007 .

[7]  Duan Li,et al.  Effects of Volatile Anesthetic Agents on Cerebral Cortical Synchronization in Sheep , 2013, Anesthesiology.

[8]  Japarath Prechapanich,et al.  Intravenous nitroglycerin for controlled cord traction in the management of retained placenta , 2011, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Yiyao Ye-Lin,et al.  Recording of electrohysterogram laplacian potential , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Chelsea Dobbins,et al.  Prediction of Preterm Deliveries from EHG Signals Using Machine Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Zhenhu Liang,et al.  A comparison of different synchronization measures in electroencephalogram during propofol anesthesia , 2016, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[13]  Miha Lucovnik,et al.  Accuracy of frequency-related parameters of the electrohysterogram for predicting preterm delivery. , 2010, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[14]  Jing Liu,et al.  A new EEG synchronization strength analysis method: S-estimator based normalized weighted-permutation mutual information , 2016, Neural Networks.

[15]  C. Marque,et al.  Spectral characterization of human EHG frequency components based on the extraction and reconstruction of the ridges in the scalogram , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Wesley K. Thompson,et al.  MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Early diagnosis of threatened premature labor by electrohysterographic recordings – The use of digital signal processing , 2016 .

[19]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Stavros Petrou,et al.  The economic consequences of preterm birth duringthe first 10 years of life , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Comparison of non-invasive electrohysterographic recording techniques for monitoring uterine dynamics. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  Javier Garcia-Casado,et al.  Feasibility and Analysis of Bipolar Concentric Recording of Electrohysterogram with Flexible Active Electrode , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  R. Garfield,et al.  Appearance of gap junctions in the myometrium of women during labor. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  M. Mischi,et al.  Electrohysterographic analysis of uterine contraction propagation with labor progression: a preliminary study , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the Literature , 2009, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[26]  W. Maner,et al.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[27]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Evaluation of muscle force classification using shape analysis of the sEMG probability density function: a simulation study , 2014, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[28]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Study protocol: PoPE-Prediction of Preterm delivery by Electrohysterography , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[29]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Electrohysterography in the diagnosis of preterm birth: a review , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[31]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[32]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  The Icelandic 16-electrode electrohysterogram database , 2015, Scientific Data.

[33]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated detection of premature delivery using empirical mode and wavelet packet decomposition techniques with uterine electromyogram signals , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[34]  E. Norwitz,et al.  Normal labor: mechanism and duration. , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[35]  Drago Rudel,et al.  A uterine electromyographic activity as a measure of labour progression , 2010 .

[36]  Holger Maul,et al.  Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients , 2005, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[37]  Holger Maul,et al.  Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[38]  Sandy Rihana,et al.  Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity , 2007, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[39]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  J. Crane,et al.  SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline. Ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in predicting preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. , 2011, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[41]  Ahmad Diab,et al.  Selection algorithm for parameters to characterize uterine EHG signals for the detection of preterm labor , 2014, Signal Image Video Process..

[42]  F Jager,et al.  Separating sets of term and pre-term uterine EMG records , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[43]  P. Schlattmann,et al.  The short-term prediction of preterm birth: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[45]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[46]  Oded Raban,et al.  A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[47]  O. Langer,et al.  Can myometrial electrical activity identify patients in preterm labor? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[48]  D. Haas,et al.  Short-term tocolytics for preterm delivery – current perspectives , 2014, International journal of women's health.

[49]  Chelsea Dobbins,et al.  Advanced artificial neural network classification for detecting preterm births using EHG records , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[50]  Aly Chkeir,et al.  Patterns of electrical activity synchronization in the pregnant rat uterus , 2013 .

[51]  Ahmad Diab,et al.  Classification of pregnancy and labor contractions using a graph theory based analysis , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[52]  Ana Pilar Betran,et al.  The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[53]  Michalis E. Zervakis,et al.  Assessment of Linear and Nonlinear Synchronization Measures for Analyzing EEG in a Mild Epileptic Paradigm , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[54]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Early predicting a risk of preterm labour by analysis of antepartum electrohysterograhic signals , 2016 .