A basic bacteriology course was offered in two successive academic years, first in a conventional format and subsequently as a "hybrid" course. The latter combined (i) online presentation of content, (ii) an emphasis on online resources, (iii) thrice-weekly, face-to-face conversations to advance understanding, and (iv) frequent student postings on an electronic discussion board. We compared the two courses through statistical analysis of student performances on the final examinations and the course overall and student assessment of teaching. The data indicated that there was no statistical difference in performance on the final examinations or the course overall. Responses on an instrument of evaluation revealed that students less strongly affirmed the following measures in the hybrid course: (i) The amount of work was appropriate for the credit received, (ii) Interactions between students and instructor were positive, (iii) I learned a great deal in this course, and (iv) I would recommend this course to other students. We recommend clear direction about active learning tasks and relevant feedback to enhance learning in a hybrid course.
[1]
Tom Carey,et al.
The ‘T5’ Design Model: An Instructional Model and Learning Environment to Support the Integration of Online and Campus‐Based Courses
,
2004
.
[2]
Jan Herrington,et al.
Engaging learners in complex, authentic contexts: Instructional design for the web
,
2000
.
[3]
T. Duffy,et al.
Critical Thinking in a Distributed Environment : A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems
,
1998
.
[4]
Curtis J. Bonk,et al.
Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse
,
1998
.
[5]
Curtis J. Bonk,et al.
Searching for Learner-Centered, Constructivist, and Sociocultural Components of Collaborative Educational Learning Tools
,
2012
.
[6]
Katherine S. Cennamo,et al.
Evolution of a Web-Enhanced Course: Incorporating Strategies for Self-Regulation
,
2002
.