On the Impact of Temporal Data Resolution on the Accuracy of Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring

Many approaches to perform Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring, i.e., to disaggregate electrical load curves collected at a single measurement point, have been presented in literature. The largely different characteristics of the datasets used to evaluate newly proposed disaggregation algorithms, however, complicate an objective and comparable assessment of their capabilities. Different temporal resolutions of the input data (i.e., different sampling rates) are a major impediment to the comparative evaluation of load disaggregation methods in particular. We hence investigate the impact of the temporal data resolution on the disaggregation results of three state-of-the-art algorithms in this work. Our study not only confirms that temporal resolution has an impact on load disaggregation accuracy, but also highlights that a favourable low-frequency sampling rate exists for the appliances under consideration, and generally falls within the range from 1 Hz to 1/30 Hz.

[1]  Christoph Klemenjak,et al.  How does Load Disaggregation Performance Depend on Data Characteristics?: Insights from a Benchmarking Study , 2020, e-Energy.

[2]  R. Venkatesha Prasad,et al.  LocED: Location-aware Energy Disaggregation Framework , 2015, BuildSys@SenSys.

[3]  Silvia Santini,et al.  The ECO data set and the performance of non-intrusive load monitoring algorithms , 2014, BuildSys@SenSys.

[4]  Anthony Rowe,et al.  BLUED : A Fully Labeled Public Dataset for Event-Based Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Research , 2012 .

[5]  Dominik Engel,et al.  Influence of data granularity on nonintrusive appliance load monitoring , 2014, IH&MMSec '14.

[6]  Christoph Klemenjak,et al.  Electricity Consumption Data Sets: Pitfalls and Opportunities , 2019, BuildSys@SenSys.

[7]  Jack Kelly,et al.  Neural NILM: Deep Neural Networks Applied to Energy Disaggregation , 2015, BuildSys@SenSys.

[8]  Andreas Reinhardt,et al.  A study on the impact of data sampling rates on load signature event detection , 2019, Energy Inform..

[9]  Jack Kelly,et al.  The UK-DALE dataset, domestic appliance-level electricity demand and whole-house demand from five UK homes , 2014, Scientific Data.

[10]  Henrik Ohlsson,et al.  Fundamental limits of nonintrusive load monitoring , 2013, HiCoNS.

[11]  Andreas Reinhardt,et al.  On the Impact of the Sequence Length on Sequence-to-Sequence and Sequence-to-Point Learning for NILM , 2020, NILM@SenSys.

[12]  Paulo C. M. Meira,et al.  Towards reproducible state-of-the-art energy disaggregation , 2019, BuildSys@SenSys.

[13]  J. Zico Kolter,et al.  REDD : A Public Data Set for Energy Disaggregation Research , 2011 .

[14]  Dominik Engel,et al.  Influence of Data Granularity on Smart Meter Privacy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Dimitris Vrakas,et al.  Machine learning approaches for non-intrusive load monitoring: from qualitative to quantitative comparation , 2018, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[16]  Lucas Pereira,et al.  Performance evaluation in non‐intrusive load monitoring: Datasets, metrics, and tools—A review , 2018, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov..

[17]  Charles A. Sutton,et al.  Sequence-to-point learning with neural networks for nonintrusive load monitoring , 2016, AAAI.