ABSTRACT Not withstanding some discomfort with the application of the language of skills in such terms as ‘interpersonal skills˚s ‘problem-solving skills˚s or ‘management skills˚s, at least part of what is being put forward under this rhetoric should be taken seriously. This is the concern that students should not merely be able to make choices intellectually but be able additionally to pursue them practically by acting in and upon a competitive social world. The paper teases out some of the different concerns underlying the notions of cross-curricular, generic, core and transferable skills and relates these to traditional principles of curriculum selection by reference to what is in some sense most fundamental or generally applicable. Cross-curricular skills are discussed in terms of their relationship to cognitive domains, and transferable skills in relationship to social domains. In either case the notion of transfer has to be parasitic upon some theory of discrete domains. It is argued that it is not ...
[1]
C. Handy.
The age of unreason
,
1989
.
[2]
D. Bridges.
Enterprise and Liberal Education
,
1992
.
[3]
J. N. Andrews.
General Thinking Skills: are there such things?
,
1990
.
[4]
Richard R. Smith.
Skills: the middle way
,
1987
.
[5]
Tyrrell Burgess,et al.
Education for capability
,
1986
.
[6]
John White.
Towards a compulsory curriculum
,
1973
.
[7]
Alison Wolf,et al.
Assessing Core Skills: wisdom or wild goose chase?
,
1991
.
[8]
Charles Bailey,et al.
Beyond the present and the particular : a theory of liberal education
,
1985
.
[9]
D. Annis.
Critical Thinking and Education
,
1982
.
[10]
P. Hirst,et al.
Knowledge and the Curriculum
,
1977
.