Mining Intellectual Influence Associations

Within the social system of science, citation practices characterize social functions like the conferral of recognition upon the work of others as well as the acknowledgement of one’s intellectual debt. However, the structure of intellectual influence is misrepresented when only the immediate citations and their cardinality are taken into consideration. Thus, in order to better understand the associative dissemination of influence and approximately construe the anatomy of this structure, complex interactions in the convoluted network of authors and papers need to be probed. Our study aims at understanding these heterogeneous complex interactions. For the bibliographic dataset of authors and publications, we define proxy scores that attempt to determine the associative influence of the cited author over the citing author. In order to harness structural connectivity of the network, we generate author vector representations using these influence scores. Furthermore, with a view to assess the competence of our proposed scores, we evaluate these representations and provide an empirical study of the results obtained with our algorithm against the baseline and also present a qualitative analysis.

[1]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[3]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  Graph-based algorithms for ranking researchers: not all swans are white! , 2012, Scientometrics.

[4]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm , 2006, J. Informetrics.

[5]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Learning influence from heterogeneous social networks , 2012, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[6]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.

[7]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[8]  David M. Shotton,et al.  CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology , 2010, J. Biomed. Semant..

[9]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[10]  Menghui Li,et al.  Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: distinguishing between prestige and popularity , 2011, ArXiv.

[11]  Hao Wang,et al.  Scientific credit diffusion: Researcher level or paper level? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[12]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Alda Lopes Gançarski,et al.  Influence in time-dependent citation networks , 2018, 2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).

[14]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks , 2016, KDD.

[15]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence , 1987, Scientometrics.

[16]  Yi Zhao,et al.  Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Gabriel Pinski,et al.  Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics , 1976, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[19]  Norman M Kaplan,et al.  The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote , 1965 .

[20]  Plergiorgio Strata,et al.  Citation analysis , 1995, Nature.

[21]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[22]  Steven Skiena,et al.  DeepWalk: online learning of social representations , 2014, KDD.

[23]  Shengrui Wang,et al.  Detecting Communities of Authority and Analyzing Their Influence in Dynamic Social Networks , 2017, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..