New Methods for the P300 Visual Speller

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI ’s) enable us to infer intentional control signals from brain activity. The Visual Speller is a BCI based on event related potentials (ERP ’s) in the electroencephalogram, such as the P300 (a positive deflection in the EEG about 300 ms after a rarely occuring stimulus). In the classical paradigm one trial (i.e. prediction of one symbol) consists of successive highlightings of one or more symbol(s) on a visual grid presented to the subject. The stimulus events in which the symbol of interest was highlighted will result in an enhanced ERP. This ERP, being stronger than the ERP’s elicited by non-target stimulus events, can be used for prediction of the letter the subject was focussing on using some machine learning algorithm, for example the support vector machine. The more symbols are highlighted simultaneously the faster the speller could potentially work. A stimulus code that uses few events per trial (and thus shows many symbols at once) is called dense. The tradeoff against code density is that the signal to noise ratio becomes worse with increasing stimulus frequency: the P300 signal is reported to be strongest when the target symbol frequency is lowest. The stimulus code in which only one symbol per stimulus event is presented, is a maximally sparse code. It has been proposed that high bitrates of information transfer in a visual speller can best be achieved with sparse stimulus codes. However sparse codes have long trial durations. In order to improve the information transfer rate, we tried to use denser stimulus codes that present fewer stimulus events per trial. To investigate the effect of stimulus type on classification accuracy and the interdependence of stimulus code and type, we explored new stimulus types including ones exploiting recent findings in neuropsychology, such as change blindness and isoluminant color motion. We show that, using appropriate stimuli, denser codes, and hence fewer stimulus events, yield sufficient classification accuracy to achieve competitive bitrates.

[1]  Arien Mack,et al.  Change blindness and priming: When it does and does not occur , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  H. Ritter,et al.  Progress in P300-based brain-computer interfacing , 2004, IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2004..

[3]  Salil H. Patel,et al.  Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected Studies of the Event-Related Potential , 2005, International journal of medical sciences.

[4]  Tommi Nykopp,et al.  Statistical Modelling Issues for The Adaptive Brain Interface , 2001 .

[5]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  Fusheng Yang,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: enhancing P300 wave detection using ICA-based subspace projections for BCI applications , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  G. Potts.  An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  T. N. Lal,et al.  Classifying EEG and ECoG signals without subject training for fast BCI implementation: comparison of nonparalyzed and completely paralyzed subjects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: effects of contrast and speed , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[17]  Thierry Pun,et al.  Analysis of bit-rate definitions for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2005, CSREA HCI.

[18]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[19]  E. Donchin,et al.  The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[20]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  High performance P300 speller for brain-computer interface , 2004, IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2004..