Biofidelity of Force Responses of Different Types of Human Surrogates in Oblique Side Impacts

In order to determine the biofidelity responses of anthropomorphic test devices, also called dummies, used in crashworthiness studies and develop injury criteria for trauma assessment devices, studies using post mortem human subjects (PMHS) are often necessary. From the perspective of side impacts, many studies are available on these issues when the applied load vector is pure lateral. Injuries, injury metrics, and injury criteria have been advanced for the current ES-2re device using matched-pair tests. Similar studies are needed for oblique loading as this mode is recognized in modern vehicle environments as an important vector for inducing trauma. Thus, the present study was designed to compare differences in the design of load-walls between different types of pure lateral tests, review literature to determine the need to conduct oblique side impact sled tests and present a detailed methodology to gather region-specific data (such as force-time curves) which can be used to accurately evaluate the local responses of PMHS and dummies, ES-2re and WorldSID. The consolidated graphs overlaying PMHS and the two dummy responses serve as a first step in the assessment of dummy biofidelity.

[1]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Prediction of thoracic injury using measurable experimental parameters , 1976 .

[2]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Splenic trauma as an adverse effect of torso-protecting side airbags: biomechanical and case evidence. , 2009, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[3]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Thoracic Deformation Contours in a Frontal Impact , 1991 .

[4]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Occupant dynamics and injuries in narrow-object side impact , 2007 .

[5]  Kevin Moorhouse,et al.  Comparison of WorldSID and ES-2re biofidelity using an updated biofidelity ranking system , 2009 .

[6]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Development of Side Impact Thoracic Injury Criteria and Their Application to the Modified ES-2 Dummy with Rib Extensions (ES-2re). , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  R H Eppinger,et al.  Mechanisms of thoracic injury in frontal impact. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of side impact: injury criteria, aging occupants, and airbag technology. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Response corridors of human surrogates in lateral impacts. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[10]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT responses in simulated far side impact. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[11]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Correlation of Side Impact Dummy/Cadaver Tests , 1981 .

[12]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Injury and response of the thorax in side impact cadaveric tests , 1993 .

[13]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Deflection, Acceleration, and Force Corridors for Small Females in Side Impacts , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Side Impact - The Biofidelity of NHTSA's Proposed ATD and Efficacy of TTI , 1986 .

[15]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Quantification of Side Impact Responses and Injuries , 1981 .

[16]  Anthony Sances,et al.  INSTRUMENTATION OF HUMAN SURROGATES FOR SIDE IMPACT , 1996 .

[17]  Suzanne Tylko,et al.  WorldSID Production Dummy Biomechanical Responses , 2009 .

[18]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Chest injuries and injury mechanisms in oblique lateral impacts , 2007 .

[19]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Biomechanical Response and Injury Tolerance of the Pelvis in Twelve Sled Side Impacts , 1990 .

[20]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Development of a new biofidelity ranking system for anthropomorphic test devices. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[21]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  CHESTBAND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN TOLERANCE TO SIDE IMPACT , 1997 .

[22]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THORACIC INJURY CRITERIA FOR SIDE IMPACT , 2000 .