Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee?

[1]  P. Lieberman.  Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[2]  I. Lehiste.  The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .

[3]  I. Lehiste.  Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity , 1973 .

[4]  I. Lehiste,et al.  Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences , 1975 .

[5]  D. Klatt.  Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse. , 1975 .

[6]  L. Streeter.  Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Segmental and Temporal Aspects of Utterance-Final Lengthening , 1981 .

[8]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Audience Design in Meaning and Reference , 1982 .

[9]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Language and comprehension , 1982 .

[10]  D. Scott,et al.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Syntax and speech , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  A. Bell.  Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[13]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[14]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  G. Dell,et al.  Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[17]  Robert M. Krauss,et al.  The Role of the Listener: Addressee Influences on Message Formulation , 1987 .

[18]  S. Brennan.  Seeking and providing evidence for mutual understanding , 1990 .

[19]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation , 1991, HLT.

[20]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[21]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  Description theory and intonation boundaries , 1991 .

[22]  Donna Jo Napoli,et al.  Bridges Between Psychology And Linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift For Lila Gleitman , 1992 .

[23]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992 .

[24]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992,45A (1) 73-87 Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2022 .

[25]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Coordinating beliefs in conversation , 1992 .

[26]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  F. Ferreira.  Creation of prosody during sentence production. , 1993, Psychological review.

[28]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[29]  R. Frick.  Accepting the null hypothesis , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[30]  S. Brennan,et al.  THE FEELING OF ANOTHER'S KNOWING : PROSODY AND FILLED PAUSES AS CUES TO LISTENERS ABOUT THE METACOGNITIVE STATES OF SPEAKERS , 1995 .

[31]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  C M Beach,et al.  Children's processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[34]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  L P Shapiro,et al.  Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[36]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Prosodic Breaks and Attachment Decisions in Sentence Parsing. , 1996 .

[38]  Keikiehi Hirose.  Disambiguating Recognition Results by Prosodic Features , 1997, Computing Prosody.

[39]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[40]  Boaz Keysar,et al.  Unconfounding common ground , 1997 .

[41]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Reductions of Spoken Words in Certain Discourse Contexts , 1997 .

[42]  Yoshinori Sagisaka,et al.  Computing Prosody, Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech , 2011 .

[43]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Articulation Quality Is Inversely Related to Redundancy When Children or Adults Have Verbal Control , 1998 .

[44]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[45]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[46]  E. Bard,et al.  Accessibility , Duration , and Modeling the Listener in Spoken Dialogue , 2000 .

[47]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[48]  P. J. Meijer,et al.  Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations , 2000, Psychological research.

[49]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  S. Brennan,et al.  How Listeners Compensate for Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech , 2001 .

[51]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[52]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[53]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Common Ground in Production 1 DRAFT : DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION . Running head : COMMON GROUND IN PRODUCTION Common Ground in Production : Effects of Mutual Knowledge on Word Duration , 2002 .

[54]  S. Brennan,et al.  Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Anne S. Henly,et al.  Speakers' overestimation of their effectiveness. , 2002, Psychological science.

[57]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[58]  A. Graesser,et al.  Handbook of discourse processes , 2003 .

[59]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[60]  S. Brennan,et al.  When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions , 2003 .

[61]  S. Brennan,et al.  Processes of Interactive Spoken Discourse: The Role of the Partner , 2003 .

[62]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context , 2003 .

[63]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework , 2003 .

[64]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[65]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Mathematical Foundations of Speech and Language Processing , 2004 .

[66]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Prosody Modeling for Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding , 2004 .

[68]  William S. Horton,et al.  Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production , 2005 .

[69]  S. Brennan.  4 How Conversation Is Shaped by Visual and Spoken Evidence , 2005 .

[70]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .