With or against Each Other? The Influence of a Virtual Agent's (Non)cooperative Behavior on User's Cooperation Behavior in the Prisoners' Dilemma

Most applications for virtual agents require the user to cooperate. Thus, it is helpful to investigate different strategies for virtual agents to evoke the user’s cooperation. In the present work (N = 80), we experimentally tested the influence of an agent’s (non)cooperative nonverbal behavior and actual decision-making behavior on user’s cooperation in the Prisoners’ Dilemma considering different age groups (students and seniors). Therefore, we used a 2 (nonverbal behavior) x 2 (age group) between-subjects design in Wizard-of-Oz study. Results show age differences with seniors cooperating more often than students do. The nonverbal behavior had no effect on the users’ willingness to cooperate nor on the evaluation of the agent’s cooperativeness. However, the agent’s decision-making behavior in the game influenced the users’ willingness to cooperate. In summary, the nonverbal behavior seemed to be too subtle, while the actions of the agent were important in terms of cooperation.

[1]  Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten,et al.  Not Your Cup of Tea? How Interacting with a Robot Can Increase Perceived Self-Efficacy in HRI and Evaluation , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[2]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Know Your Users! Empirical Results for Tailoring an Agent's Nonverbal Behavior to Different User Groups , 2010, IVA.

[3]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Younger and older users' recognition of virtual agent facial expressions , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  O. John,et al.  Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German , 2007 .

[5]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  The Effect of an Intelligent Virtual Agent's Nonverbal Behavior with Regard to Dominance and Cooperativity , 2016, IVA.

[6]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  Social Value Orientation, Expectations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta–Analysis , 2018 .

[7]  Karen L. Schmidt,et al.  Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous Prisoner's Dilemma game , 2012 .

[8]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self‐and other‐perceived nonverbal immediacy , 2003 .

[9]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Virtual Agents as Daily Assistants for Elderly or Cognitively Impaired People - Studies on Acceptance and Interaction Feasibility , 2013, IVA.

[10]  Jaeseung Jeong,et al.  Neural dynamics of two players when using nonverbal cues to gauge intentions to cooperate during the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 2017, NeuroImage.

[11]  Ross Buck,et al.  Emotional Expressivity and Trustworthiness: The Role of Nonverbal Behavior in the Evolution of Cooperation , 2003 .

[12]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Intelligent Agents Who Wear Your Face: Users' Reactions to the Virtual Self , 2001, IVA.

[14]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  Expression of Moral Emotions in Cooperating Agents , 2009, IVA.

[15]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Emotional expressivity as a signal of cooperation , 2010 .

[16]  Chris Moore,et al.  Smile asymmetries and reputation as reliable indicators of likelihood to cooperate: An evolutionary analysis , 2002 .

[17]  Paul L. Rosin,et al.  Facial dynamics as indicators of trustworthiness and cooperative behavior. , 2007, Emotion.