A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN FIXATION OF MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURE WITH A SINGLE MINIPLATE PLACED EITHER TRANSBUCCALLY AND INTRAORALLY OR INTRAORALLY ALONE

Aim and Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate various parameters which includes various difficulties faced by the surgeon, total time taken for procedure and post-operative complication in fixation of mandibular angle fracture with single miniplate placed either transbucally and intraorally or intraorally alone. Material and Methods: Patients with Mandibular Angle Fracture were selected for the study from department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery at Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College, Moradabad. The patients after inclusion were randomly divided into two group, Group A and Group B (10 patients in each group). In the group A, fixation was carried out in the area of the external oblique line of the mandible, with miniplate through intraoral approach. In group B, fixation was done through intraoral incision and transbuccal approach combined using transbuccal trochar instrumentation. Results: After 2 weeks 8 patients in Intra-oral group had swelling compared to 9 in Combined group. But after 4 weeks none of the patients in combined group had *Corresponding Author Dr. Vishal MDS, Tutor, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Institute, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834009, India. drarungoyalmds@yahoo.co.i n Article Received on 07 April 2019, Revised on 28 April 2019, Accepted on 18 May 2019 DOI: 10.20959/wjpr20197-15116 World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research SJIF Impact Factor 8.074 Volume 8, Issue 7, 1798-1808. Research Article ISSN 2277– 7105 Vishal et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research www.wjpr.net Vol 8, Issue 7, 2019. 1799 swelling comparing 2 in the Intra-oral group. Post –operative infection was less in combined group (0) after 2 weeks comparing Intra-oral group (2). Result shows that infection, wound dehiscence and plate exposure are directly interrelated. The chances of plate exposure and postoperative infection is proportional to wound dehiscence Intraoral group had more change of above three complication. Conclusion: Although Intra-oral and Transbuccal combined approached had better outcome than Intra-oral alone approach. Further more study with more sample sizeis required for definite conclusion.

[1]  C. Kiliç,et al.  Determination of a safety zone for transbuccal trocar placement: an anatomical study. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  D. C. Jones,et al.  Intraoral external oblique ridge compared with transbuccal lateral cortical plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular angle: prospective randomised trial. , 2012, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  N. Ahuja,et al.  A comparative study between transbuccal and extra-oral approaches in treatment of mandibular fractures , 2010, Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery.

[4]  R. Meleca,et al.  Transoral versus Extraoral Reduction of Mandible Fractures: A Comparison of Complication Rates and other Factors , 2003, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[5]  E. Ellis Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle. , 1999, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  D. Perrott Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate , 1996 .