Despite Double skin facade (DSF) buildings are widely deployed worldwide, daylighting strategy is not commonly incorporated in these buildings compare to other strategies. Therefore, further theoretical and experimental studies would lead to adopting daylighting strategy in DSF office buildings. The aim of this study is to investigate the daylighting performance of office building at different design parameters of box window DSF using different glazing types under sub interval of intermediate sky conditions (20-40) klux using the (IES VE) simulation tool from Integrated Environmental Solutions - Virtual Environment. The implemented design parameters are window wall ratio (WWR) of internal facade (10-100) %, cavity depth (CD) of DSF (1-2.5) m and different glazing types. The glazing types were selected from the list available in the (IES VE) simulation tool. After series of evaluations, bronze tinted coating (STOPSOL) is implemented for the exterior facade while clear float, clear reflective coating (STOPSOL), grey and brown tinted coating (Anti-sun float) and blue coating tinted (SUNCOOL float) are implemented for the interior facade. In this paper, several evaluation parameters are used to quantify the optimum design parameters that would balance the daylighting requirements of a box window DSF office versus sky conditions range (20-40) klux. The optimum design parameters of DSF office building obtained under different glazing types are highlighted as follows. When using bronze tinted coating (STOPSOL) for the exterior facade, the glazing types of interior facade that showed superior daylighting performance of DSF office at (CD of 1.0m with WWR of 70%), (CD of 1.5m with WWR of 70%), (CD of 2.0m with WWR of 70%) and (CD of 2.0m with WWR of 70%) are grey tinted coating (Anti-sun float), clear reflective coating (STOPSOL), brown tinted coating (Anti-sun float), and clear float glazing respectively. Blue Coating tinted (SUNCOOL float) of interior facade glazing failed to meet outstanding daylighting performance at any cavity depth.
[1]
Ali GhaffarianHoseini,et al.
Exploring the advantages and challenges of double-skin façades (DSFs)
,
2016
.
[2]
C. Jettanasen,et al.
A Study an Impact of Daylight with Period Time on Illuminance and Uniformity for Building
,
.
[3]
Arild Gustavsen,et al.
Fenestration of Today and Tomorrow: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Research Opportunities
,
2013
.
[4]
D. Karamanis,et al.
Solar energy materials for glazing technologies
,
2016
.
[5]
Ahmed Hamza H. Ali,et al.
Double Skin Façade : The State of Art on Building Energy Efficiency
,
.
[6]
offices Reinhart.
Effects of Interior Design on the Daylight Availability in Open Plan Offices
,
2002
.
[7]
Brian Norton,et al.
Daylighting performance and glare calculation of a suspended particle device switchable glazing
,
2016
.
[8]
Zahra Sadat Zomorodian,et al.
The Effect of Window Configuration on Daylight Performance in Classrooms: A Field and Simulation Study
,
2016
.
[9]
J. D. Murphya,et al.
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
,
2018
.