The Role of Self-Monitoring and Gender on Leader Emergence: A Laboratory and Field Study

Two studies were conducted to investigate the influence of self-monitoring ability and gender on leader emergence. In Study I, groups composed of a male high self-monitor, male low self-monitor, female high self-monitor, andfemale low self-monitor worked on a salary allocation task. At the end of the task, subjects completed questionnaires that asked them to select one group member as their leader. The amount of influence each group member exerted during the discussion was also assessed. Analyses indicated that high self-monitors emerged as leaders more frequently than did low self-monitors and men emerged as leaders more frequently than did women. Study II replicated these results in 9 volunteer organizations. Implications of the findings for managerial practice and future research are discussed.

[1]  J. G. Hunt,et al.  Emerging leadership vistas , 1989 .

[2]  C. Carver,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES How Should Multifaceted Personality Constructs Be Tested ? Issues Illustrated by Self-Monitoring , Attributional Style , and Hardiness , 2004 .

[3]  S. Briggs,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. , 1988 .

[4]  R. Cardy,et al.  The Effects of Purpose of Appraisal and Individual Differences in Stereotypes of Women on Sex Differences in Performance Ratings: A Laboratory and Field Study , 1988 .

[5]  R. Lord,et al.  A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: an application of validity generalization procedures , 1986 .

[6]  L. Nyquist,et al.  Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. , 1986 .

[7]  Mark Snyder,et al.  "To Carve Nature at Its Joints": On the Existence of Discrete Classes in Personality , 1985 .

[8]  Diane Keyser Wentworth,et al.  Emergent leadership as a function of sex and task type , 1984 .

[9]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. , 1983 .

[11]  Morgan W. McCall,et al.  Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership , 1982 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Self-Monitoring and the Attitude-Behavior Relation , 1982 .

[13]  J. G. Hunt,et al.  Leadership, beyond establishment views , 1982 .

[14]  G. Elliott.  Some Effects of Deception and Level of Self-Monitoring on Planning and Reacting to a Self-Presentation , 1979 .

[15]  R. Ashmore,et al.  Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive—Social psychological conceptualization , 1979 .

[16]  H. Garland,et al.  Relationship Between Self-Monitoring and Leader Emergence Across Two Task Situations. , 1979 .

[17]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[18]  E I Megargee,et al.  Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  W. O. Jenkins.  A review of leadership studies with particular reference to military problems. , 1947, Psychological bulletin.