Experimental and Numerical Optimization of a High-Lift System To Improve Low-Speed Performance, Stability, and Control of an Arrow-Wing Supersonic Transport

An investigation was performed to evaluate leading-and trailing-edge flap deflections for optimal aerodynamic performance of a High-Speed Civil Transport concept during takeoff and approach-to-landing conditions. The configuration used for this study was designed by the Douglas Aircraft Company during the 1970's. A 0.1-scale model of this configuration was tested in the Langley 30- by 60-Foot Tunnel with both the original leading-edge flap system and a new leading-edge flap system, which was designed with modem computational flow analysis and optimization tools. Leading-and trailing-edge flap deflections were generated for the original and modified leading-edge flap systems with the computational flow analysis and optimization tools. Although wind tunnel data indicated improvements in aerodynamic performance for the analytically derived flap deflections for both leading-edge flap systems, perturbations of the analytically derived leading-edge flap deflections yielded significant additional improvements in aerodynamic performance. In addition to the aerodynamic performance optimization testing, stability and control data were also obtained. An evaluation of the crosswind landing capability of the aircraft configuration revealed that insufficient lateral control existed as a result of high levels of lateral stability. Deflection of the leading-and trailing-edge flaps improved the crosswind landing capability of the vehicle considerably; however, additional improvements are required.

[1]  P. L. Coe,et al.  Effects of wing leading-edge deflection on low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a low-aspect-ratio highly swept arrow-wing configuration. [wind tunnel tests] , 1979 .

[2]  P. L. Coe,et al.  Low-speed wind-tunnel investigation of a large-scale advanced arrow wing supersonic transport configuration with engines mounted above the wing for upper-surface blowing , 1975 .

[3]  Harry W. Carlson,et al.  Validation of a pair of computer codes for estimation and optimization of subsonic aerodynamic performance of simple hinged-flap systems for thin swept wings , 1988 .

[4]  R. L. Radkey,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of a Mach 2.2 Supersonic Cruise Aircraft , 1976 .

[5]  James W. Fenbert,et al.  Leading-edge deflection optimization for a highly swept arrow wing configuration , 1980 .

[6]  Lee H. Person,et al.  Piloted Simulation Study of the Effects of High-Lift Aerodynamics on the Takeoff Noise of a Representative High-Speed Civil Transport , 1999 .

[7]  A. B. Graham,et al.  Results of recent NASA research on low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic cruise aircraft , 1976 .

[8]  P. L. Coe,et al.  Effects of wing leading-edge deflection on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a low-aspect-ratio highly swept arrow-wing configuration , 1978 .

[9]  E. D. Olson Advanced takeoff procedures for high-speed civil transport community noise reduction , 1992 .

[10]  Theodore Theodorsen,et al.  Experimental Verification of the Theory of Wind-Tunnel Boundary Interference , 1935 .

[11]  G. L. Gentry,et al.  Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a highly swept, untwisted uncambered arrow wing , 1983 .

[12]  L. P. Parlett,et al.  Low-speed wind tunnel investigation of an advanced supersonic cruise arrow-wing configuration , 1977 .