Towards a unified terminology for angiosperm reproductive systems
暂无分享,去创建一个
R. Matias | M. T. Furtado | H. Consolaro | V. L. G. Brito | M. L. Viana | J. C. Cardoso | A. P. S. Caetano
[1] P. Oliveira,et al. Unusual diversity of apomictic mechanisms in a species of Miconia, Melastomataceae , 2018, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[2] C. Goodwillie,et al. The best of both worlds? A review of delayed selfing in flowering plants. , 2018, American journal of botany.
[3] P. Oliveira,et al. Unexpectedly high genetic diversity and divergence among populations of the apomictic Neotropical tree Miconia albicans. , 2018, Plant biology.
[4] H. Consolaro,et al. Floral biology of the velvetseed Guettarda platypoda DC. (Rubiaceae): Atypical distyly or style dimorphism? , 2018 .
[5] P. Oliveira,et al. Bow to the middle: reproductive system and style behaviour of Tococa guianensis, a widespread Melastomataceae from the Neotropics , 2018, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[6] L. Harder,et al. The Ecology of Mating and Its Evolutionary Consequences in Seed Plants , 2017 .
[7] Charles S. P. Foster,et al. The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification , 2017, Nature Communications.
[8] N. S. Júnior. Evidence for post-zygotic self-incompatibility in Handroanthus impetiginosus (Bignoniaceae) , 2017, Plant Reproduction.
[9] R. Harley,et al. Resupinate Dimorphy, a novel pollination strategy in two-lipped flowers of Eplingiella (Lamiaceae) , 2017 .
[10] J. Pannell,et al. On the rarity of dioecy in flowering plants , 2017, Molecular ecology.
[11] P. Gibbs. Head over heels about floral polymorphism: a novel floral dimorphism based on resupination , 2017 .
[12] Túlio Sá,et al. Floral biology, reciprocal herkogamy and breeding system in four Psychotria species (Rubiaceae) in Brazil , 2016 .
[13] T. Marcussen,et al. Cleistogamy and phylogenetic position of Viola uliginosa (Violaceae) re‐examined , 2016 .
[14] P. Oliveira,et al. Sporophytic apomixis in polyembryonic Handroanthus serratifolius (Vahl) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae) characterizes the species as an agamic polyploid complex , 2016, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[15] S. Barrett,et al. Variation in style morph frequencies in tristylous Lythrum salicaria in the Iberian Peninsula: the role of geographical and demographic factors. , 2015, Annals of botany.
[16] D. Charlesworth. Plant contributions to our understanding of sex chromosome evolution. , 2015, The New phytologist.
[17] S. Billiard,et al. The joint evolution and maintenance of self-incompatibility with gynodioecy or androdioecy. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.
[18] D. Hojsgaard,et al. A little bit of sex matters for genome evolution in asexual plants , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..
[19] H. Yoshida,et al. Cleistogamy Decreases the Effect of High Temperature Stress at Flowering in Rice , 2015 .
[20] S. Renner. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. , 2014, American journal of botany.
[21] K. Suetsugu. Gastrodia flexistyloides (Orchidaceae), a new mycoheterotrophic plant with complete cleistogamy from Japan , 2014 .
[22] P. Gibbs. Late-acting self-incompatibility--the pariah breeding system in flowering plants. , 2014, The New phytologist.
[23] A. Koltunow,et al. The Genetic Control of Apomixis: Asexual Seed Formation , 2014, Genetics.
[24] D. Hojsgaard,et al. Taxonomy and Biogeography of Apomixis in Angiosperms and Associated Biodiversity Characteristics , 2014, Critical reviews in plant sciences.
[25] A. Dornier,et al. HOW SELFING, INBREEDING DEPRESSION, AND POLLEN LIMITATION IMPACT NUCLEAR‐CYTOPLASMIC GYNODIOECY: A MODEL , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[26] P. Oliveira,et al. Diplospory and obligate apomixis in Miconia albicans (Miconieae, Melastomataceae) and an embryological comparison with its sexual congener M. chamissois , 2013, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[27] P. Oliveira,et al. Reproductive biology and species geographical distribution in the Melastomataceae: a survey based on New World taxa. , 2012, Annals of botany.
[28] M. M. Ferrer,et al. Self-sterility in flowering plants: preventing self-fertilization increases family diversification rates. , 2012, Annals of botany.
[29] M. Costa,et al. Polyembryony increases embryo and seedling mortality but also enhances seed individual survival in Handroanthus species (Bignoniaceae) , 2012 .
[30] M. Iwano,et al. Self/non-self discrimination in angiosperm self-incompatibility. , 2012, Current opinion in plant biology.
[31] L. Navarro,et al. Unusual heterostyly: style dimorphism and self-incompatibility are not tightly associated in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). , 2012, Annals of botany.
[32] G. Du,et al. Variation in floral sex allocation, female success, and seed predation within racemiform synflorescence in the gynomonoecious Ligularia virgaurea (Asteraceae) , 2012, Journal of Plant Research.
[33] C. Ruan,et al. Adaptive Significance of Floral Movement , 2011 .
[34] Z. G. M. Quirino,et al. Fenologia reprodutiva, biologia floral e polinização de Allamanda blanchetii, uma Apocynaceae endêmica da Caatinga , 2011 .
[35] J. Gómez,et al. Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. , 2011, The New phytologist.
[36] R. Bertin,et al. Differential herbivory on disk and ray flowers of gynomonoecious asters and goldenrods (Asteraceae) , 2010 .
[37] M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al. Trait correlates and functional significance of heteranthery in flowering plants. , 2010, The New phytologist.
[38] P. Qin,et al. Style curvature and its adaptive significance in the Malvaceae , 2010, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[39] Y. Savidan. Apomixis: genetics and breeding. , 2010 .
[40] Guillaume Constantin de Magny,et al. A Self-Incompatibility System Explains High Male Frequencies in an Androdioecious Plant , 2010, Science.
[41] E. Hörandl,et al. The evolution of self-fertility in apomictic plants , 2010, Sexual Plant Reproduction.
[42] S. Barrett. Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[43] S. Barrett. Understanding plant reproductive diversity , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[44] G. A. Venturieri,et al. Floral biology of cacauhy (Theobroma speciosum - Malvaceae) , 2010 .
[45] D. Charlesworth,et al. The genetics of inbreeding depression , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[46] L. Freitas,et al. Floral biology and mechanisms of spontaneous self-pollination in five neotropical species of Gentianaceae , 2009 .
[47] Matthew R. Tucker,et al. Sexual and asexual (apomictic) seed development in flowering plants: molecular, morphological and evolutionary relationships. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.
[48] M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. , 2009, Annals of botany.
[49] J. Thomson,et al. Division of labour within flowers: heteranthery, a floral strategy to reconcile contrasting pollen fates , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[50] Nadia Talent,et al. Evolution of gametophytic apomixis in flowering plants: an alternative model from Maloid Rosaceae , 2009, Theory in Biosciences.
[51] E. Schulze,et al. Temporal variation in δ13C, wood density and microfibril angle in variously irrigated Eucalyptus nitens. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.
[52] S. Renner,et al. Why two kinds of stamens in buzz‐pollinated flowers? Experimental support for Darwin's division‐of‐labour hypothesis , 2008 .
[53] W. Ye,et al. Secondary pollen presentation and style morphology in the invasive weed Mikania micrantha in South China. , 2008 .
[54] T. Naumova. Apomixis and amphimixis in flowering plants , 2008, Cytology and Genetics.
[55] F. Thuijsman,et al. Optimal Sex Allocation in Plants and the Evolution of Monoecy , 2008 .
[56] J. Silvertown. The Evolutionary Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction: Evidence from the Ecological Distribution of Asexual Reproduction in Clonal Plants , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[57] S. Otto,et al. The Dynamic Nature of Apomixis in the Angiosperms , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[58] T. Dickinson,et al. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications , 2007, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[59] T. B. Batygina,et al. Phenomenon of polyembryony. Genetic heterogeneity of seeds , 2007, Russian Journal of Developmental Biology.
[60] T. Culley,et al. The cleistogamous breeding system: A review of its frequency, evolution, and ecology in angiosperms , 2007, The Botanical Review.
[61] Da‐Yong Zhang,et al. Adaptive significance of flexistyly in Alpinia blepharocalyx (Zingiberaceae): a hand-pollination experiment. , 2006, Annals of botany.
[62] D. Charlesworth. Evolution of Plant Breeding Systems , 2006, Current Biology.
[63] M. Verdú,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF GENDER SPECIALIZATION FROM DIMORPHIC HERMAPHRODITISM: PATHS FROM HETERODICHOGAMY TO GYNODIOECY AND ANDRODIOECY , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[64] N. Cappuccino,et al. A field study of seed dispersal and seedling performance in the invasive exotic vine Vincetoxicum rossicum , 2005 .
[65] C. Mendes-Rodrigues,et al. Polyembryony and apomixis in Eriotheca pubescens (Malvaceae - Bombacoideae). , 2005, Plant biology.
[66] P. Diggle,et al. The evolution of unisexual flowers: morphological and functional convergence results from diverse developmental transitions. , 2005, American journal of botany.
[67] A. Isogai,et al. Self-incompatibility in plants. , 2005, Annual review of plant biology.
[68] N. Ramírez. Plant sexual systems, dichogamy, and herkogamy in the Venezuelan Central Plain , 2005 .
[69] G. Anderson,et al. Are ‘mating systems’ ‘breeding systems’ of inconsistent and confusing terminology in plant reproductive biology? or is it the other way around? , 2005, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[70] R. Bicknell,et al. Understanding Apomixis: Recent Advances and Remaining Conundrums , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.
[71] N. Takebayashi,et al. Pollen Limitation and the Evolution of Androdioecy from Dioecy , 2004, The American Naturalist.
[72] F. C. H. Franklin,et al. Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. , 2003, Trends in plant science.
[73] Ueli Grossniklaus,et al. Apomixis: a developmental perspective. , 2003, Annual review of plant biology.
[74] D. Grimanelli,et al. Heterochronic expression of sexual reproductive programs during apomictic development in Tripsacum. , 2003, Genetics.
[75] S. Barrett,et al. The Comparative Biology of Mirror‐Image Flowers , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[76] S. Hiscock,et al. The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[77] A. Richards. Apomixis in flowering plants: an overview. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[78] S. Barrett. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[79] T. Day,et al. A Theoretical Investigation of the Evolution and Maintenance of Mirror‐Image Flowers , 2003, The American Naturalist.
[80] D. Charlesworth,et al. Estimating the number, frequency, and dominance of S-alleles in a natural population of Arabidopsis Lyrata (Brassicaceae) with sporophytic control of self-incompatibility , 2003, Heredity.
[81] P. Bozhkov,et al. Programmed cell death eliminates all but one embryo in a polyembryonic plant seed , 2002, Cell Death and Differentiation.
[82] S. Barrett,et al. Enantiostyly: Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers , 2002, Nature.
[83] W. Kress,et al. Mating system and stigmatic behaviour during flowering of Alpinia kwangsiensis (Zingiberaceae) , 2002, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[84] S. Barrett. Evolution of sex: The evolution of plant sexual diversity , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[85] S. Barrett,et al. Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism. , 2002, American journal of botany.
[86] S. Barrett,et al. Sexual interference of the floral kind , 2002, Heredity.
[87] D. Charlesworth,et al. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes , 2002, Heredity.
[88] S. Renner. How common is heterodichogamy , 2001 .
[89] W. Kress,et al. Pollination: Flexible style that encourages outcrossing , 2001, Nature.
[90] B. Charlesworth,et al. The degeneration of Y chromosomes. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[91] J. C. Heilbuth. Lower Species Richness in Dioecious Clades , 2000, The American Naturalist.
[92] K. Holsinger. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[93] S. Barrett,et al. The Evolution and Function of Stylar Polymorphisms in Flowering Plants , 2000 .
[94] L. Harder,et al. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[95] C. Eckert. CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTOGAMY AND GEITONOGAMY TO SELF-FERTILIZATION IN A MASS-FLOWERING, CLONAL PLANT , 2000 .
[96] M. Donoghue,et al. Phylogenetic Analysis of Dioecy in Monocotyledons , 2000, The American Naturalist.
[97] S. Barrett. The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants , 1998 .
[98] D. Couvet,et al. Main role of self-pollination rate on reproductive allocations in pseudogamous apomicts , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[99] J. Carman. Asynchronous expression of duplicate genes in angiosperms may cause apomixis, bispory, tetraspory, and polyembryony , 1997 .
[100] A. Richards. Genetic variability in obligate apomicts of the genusTaraxacum , 1996, Folia Geobotanica.
[101] Mark Williamson,et al. The characters of successful invaders , 1996 .
[102] R. Cruden,et al. EMBRYOPHYTES HAVE EQUIVALENT SEXUAL PHENOTYPES AND BREEDING SYSTEMS : WHY NOT A COMMON TERMINOLOGY TO DESCRIBE THEM ? , 1995 .
[103] R. Ricklefs,et al. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants , 1995 .
[104] Christian M. Newman,et al. Dichogamy in angiosperms , 1993, The Botanical Review.
[105] J. Richards,et al. PROTANDRY, INCOMPATIBILITY, AND SECONDARY POLLEN PRESENTATION IN CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALS (RUBIACEAE) , 1993 .
[106] D. G. Lloyd,et al. Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. I. Functional Dimensions , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[107] D. G. Lloyd,et al. Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. II. The Selection of Self- Fertilization , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[108] J. Zimmerman. Ecological Correlates of Labile Sex Expression in the Orchid Catasetum Viridiflavum , 1991 .
[109] K. Spalik,et al. On evolution of andromonoecy and 'overproduction' of flowers : a resource allocation model , 1991 .
[110] N. Ramírez,et al. Reproductive biology of a tropical palm swamp community in the venezuelan llanos , 1990 .
[111] P. Gibbs. Do homomorphic and heteromorphic self-incompatibility systems have the same sporophytic mechanism? , 1986, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[112] K. Kubitzki,et al. Synchronized dichogamy and dioecy in neotropicalLauraceae , 1984, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[113] D. Charlesworth. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy , 1984 .
[114] E. Lord,et al. COMPARATIVE FLOWER DEVELOPMENT IN THE CLEISTOGAMOUS SPECIES VIOLA ODORATA. II. AN ORGANOGRAPHIC STUDY , 1983 .
[115] K. Bawa,et al. SELF‐INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS IN THE RUBIACEAE OF A TROPICAL LOWLAND WET FOREST , 1983 .
[116] E. Lord. Cleistogamy: A tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution , 1981, The Botanical Review.
[117] D. Charlesworth,et al. A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in Gynodioecious species , 1981, Heredity.
[118] D. C. Freeman,et al. INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT ON THE FLORAL SEX RATIO OF MONOECIOUS PLANTS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[119] K. Bawa. Evolution of Dioecy in Flowering Plants , 1980 .
[120] D. Lloyd. SEXUAL STRATEGIES IN PLANTS , 1980 .
[121] F. R. Ganders. The biology of heterostyly , 1979 .
[122] B. Charlesworth,et al. A Model for the Evolution of Distyly , 1979, The American Naturalist.
[123] B. Charlesworth,et al. A Model for the Evolution of Dioecy and Gynodioecy , 1978, The American Naturalist.
[124] D. Janzen. A Note on Optimal Mate Selection by Plants , 1977, The American Naturalist.
[125] D. G. Lloyd,et al. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms , 1975, Genetica.
[126] J. Heslop-Harrison. Pollen Wall Development , 1968 .
[127] H. G. Baker. SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW—AS A RULE , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[128] F. Cope. The mechanism of pollen incompatibility in Theobroma cacao L. , 1962, Heredity.
[129] K. K. Pandey. Time of the S Allele Action , 1958, Nature.
[130] P. Fryxell. Mode of reproduction of higher plants , 1957, The Botanical Review.
[131] J. Dowrick,et al. Heterostyly and homostyly in Primula obconica , 1956, Heredity.
[132] K. Mather. THE GENETICAL ARCHITECTURE OF HETEROSTYLY IN PRIMULA SINENSIS , 1950 .
[133] H. Whitehouse. Multiple-allelomorph incompatibility of pollen and style in the evolution of the angiosperms. , 1950 .
[134] D. Lewis. THE EVOLUTION OF SEX IN FLOWERING PLANTS , 1942 .
[135] J. Midgley,et al. Style polymorphism in Linum (Linaceae): a case of Mediterranean parallel evolution? , 2018, Plant biology.
[136] S. Munné-Bosch,et al. Sex ratios in dioecious plants in the framework of global change , 2015 .
[137] W. Armbruster,et al. In the right place at the right time: Parnassia resolves the herkogamy dilemma by accurate repositioning of stamens and stigmas. , 2014, Annals of botany.
[138] D. Charlesworth. Plant sex chromosome evolution. , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.
[139] L. Bruno,et al. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants , 2012 .
[140] A. Naiki. Heterostyly and the possibility of its breakdown by polyploidization , 2012 .
[141] P. Oliveira,et al. Breakdown of distyly and pin‐monomorphism in Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae) , 2011 .
[142] S. Mazer,et al. Stigma closure and re-opening in Oroxylum indicum (Bignoniaceae): Causes and consequences. , 2010, American journal of botany.
[143] A. Lopes,et al. Phenology, pollination, and breeding system of the threatened tree Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae), and a review of studies on the reproductive biology in the genus , 2009 .
[144] L. Navarro,et al. Evolutionary transitions of style polymorphisms in Lithodora (Boraginaceae) , 2009 .
[145] J. Nasrallah,et al. Self-incompatibility systems: barriers to self-fertilization in flowering plants. , 2008, The International journal of developmental biology.
[146] Lu Yang,et al. Adaptive advantages of gynomonoecious species , 2006 .
[147] D. C. Freeman,et al. Sex change in plants: Old and new observations and new hypotheses , 2004, Oecologia.
[148] W. Kress,et al. Stigmatic behavior and the pollination biology of Alpinia kwangsiensis (Zingiberaceae) , 2002 .
[149] U. Kües,et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of sexual incompatibility in plants and fungi. , 1999, International review of cytology.
[150] A. Isogai,et al. A Review of Recent Studies on Homomorphic Self-Incompatibility , 1993 .
[151] D. Calder,et al. The Breeding Biology of Epacris impressa. Is This Species Heterostylous , 1989 .
[152] P. Gibbs. Self-incompatibility mechanism in flowering plants: some complications and clarification , 1988 .
[153] D. G. Lloyd,et al. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy , 1986 .
[154] K. Bawa,et al. Evolution of Sexual Systems in Flowering Plants , 1981 .