论文信息 - A comparison of MS2‐based label‐free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision

A comparison of MS2‐based label‐free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision

The advent of algorithms for fragmentation spectrum‐based label‐free quantitative proteomics has enabled straightforward quantification of shotgun proteomic experiments. Despite the popularity of these approaches, few studies have been performed to assess their performance. We have therefore profiled the precision and the accuracy of three distinct relative label‐free methods on both the protein and the proteome level. We derived our test data from two well‐characterized publicly available quantitative data sets.

Lennart Martens | Niklaas Colaert | Kris Gevaert | Joël Vandekerckhove

[1] M. Mann,et al. MSQuant, an open source platform for mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[2] J. Koziol,et al. Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomics analysis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[3] M. Washburn,et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4] Lennart Martens,et al. Peptide and protein quantification: A map of the minefield , 2010, Proteomics.

[5] M. Mann,et al. Large-scale Proteomic Analysis of the Human Spliceosome References , 2006 .

[6] M. Mann,et al. Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index (emPAI) for Estimation of Absolute Protein Amount in Proteomics by the Number of Sequenced Peptides per Protein*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[7] R. Aebersold,et al. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[8] David L. Tabb,et al. Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.