This project designs a Web-based evaluation management system for the College of Arts and Sciences (CAS). Problem statement: The Msc students in College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) in applied sciences had to take their final project as a project paper in order to fulfill the requirements of their programs and be able to graduate. The final project was evaluated in two parts; first part is representing 40% of the total mark and evaluated by evaluators. Second part was representing 60% of the total mark and evaluated by the student's supervisor. These evaluation were done manually. Both the evaluators and supervisors had to fill in the evaluation forms manually and submit them to the office. Approach: The design research methodology or sometimes called "improvement research" contained the major steps: Awareness the problem, suggestion, development, evaluation and conclusion. Results: Both evaluators and supervisors can fill in the evaluation forms through the Internet. Bring the advantage of saving time and resources over traditional paper and pencil scan sheet method. For enhancing the performance of current final project evaluation process in College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) this study proposed a web based evaluation management system to replace the current paper forms used by the evaluators and supervisors. Conclusion: Implementing this system will enable the evaluation results to be entered, presume and retrieved anytime anywhere.
[1]
Benjamin H. Layne,et al.
ELECTRONIC VERSUS TRADITIONAL STUDENT RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION
,
1999
.
[2]
Curt J. Dommeyer,et al.
Attitudes of Business Faculty Towards Two Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: Paper vs. Online
,
2002
.
[3]
Linying Dong,et al.
Modeling top management influence on ES implementation
,
2001,
Bus. Process. Manag. J..
[4]
Bruce Ravelli,et al.
Anonymous Online Teaching Assessments: Preliminary Findings.
,
2000
.
[5]
A. Greasley,et al.
Can Computer-Based Testing Achieve Quality and Efficiency in Assessment?
,
1995
.
[6]
Robert W. Hanna,et al.
Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations
,
2004
.
[7]
Gillian Fletcher,et al.
The calm before the storm.
,
2005,
The practising midwife.
[8]
J. McGourty,et al.
Web-based course evaluation: comparing the experience at two universities
,
2002,
32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.
[9]
David L. Jones,et al.
Web Site Engineering: Beyond Web Page Design
,
1998
.
[10]
Robert D. Tortora,et al.
INFLUENCE OF PLAIN VS. FANCY DESIGN ON RESPONSE RATES FOR WEB SURVEYS
,
1999
.
[11]
Howard K Wachtel,et al.
Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: a brief review
,
1998
.