A probabilistic model of human error assessment for autonomous cargo ships focusing on human–autonomy collaboration

Abstract Despite the use of automation technology in the maritime industry, human errors are still the typical navigational risk influencing factors in autonomous ships with the third degree of autonomy. However, there is an urgent need for new human error probability assessment focusing on the autonomous cargo ships with human–autonomy collaboration. Hence, to assess these human errors during the emergency response process, a probabilistic model is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the risk factors are identified and classified by analysing the operational process of the Shore Control Centre (SCC). This is followed by the establishment of an event tree model delivered from human errors using Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction (THERP). Furthermore, Bayesian Networks (BNs) model is utilized for the three stages of perception, decision, and execution. Finally, the human errors probabilities are calculated for the mentioned three stages focusing on human–autonomy collaboration. Moreover, the importance of human error factors is quantified with sensitivity analysis, which can provide flexible references for the theoretical construction of the SCC and training of operators. The process was applied to assess the probabilities of human errors focusing on human–autonomy collaboration under the remote navigation mode of an autonomous cargo ship (test ship) in the city of Wuhan, China.

[1]  Martin Bergström,et al.  A systemic hazard analysis and management process for the concept design phase of an autonomous vessel , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Human-system concurrent task analysis for maritime autonomous surface ship operation and safety , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Human Error Probability Assessment During Maintenance Activities of Marine Systems , 2017, Safety and health at work.

[4]  Xinping Yan,et al.  A distributed anti-collision decision support formulation in multi-ship encounter situations under COLREGs , 2015 .

[5]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Autonomous Unmanned Merchant Vessel and its Contribution towards the e-Navigation Implementation: The MUNIN Perspective , 2014 .

[6]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Collision avoidance on maritime autonomous surface ships: Operators’ tasks and human failure events , 2019, Safety Science.

[7]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Arctic shipping accident scenario analysis using Bayesian Network approach , 2017 .

[8]  Krzysztof Wróbel,et al.  A framework to identify factors influencing navigational risk for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships , 2020 .

[9]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Human factor issues during remote ship monitoring tasks: An ecological lesson for system design in a distributed context , 2018, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

[10]  Pengfei Chen,et al.  Ship collision avoidance methods: State-of-the-art , 2020 .

[11]  Samrat Ghosh,et al.  Autonomous merchant vessels: examination of factors that impact the effective implementation of unmanned ships , 2016 .

[12]  I. Bačkalov Safety of autonomous inland vessels: An analysis of regulatory barriers in the present technical standards in Europe , 2020 .

[13]  Jin Wang,et al.  Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Shuen-Tai Ung,et al.  Evaluation of human error contribution to oil tanker collision using fault tree analysis and modified fuzzy Bayesian Network based CREAM , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[15]  Sauli Ahvenjärvi,et al.  The Human Element and Autonomous Ships , 2016 .

[16]  Jaakko Hakulinen,et al.  Human Factors Challenges in Unmanned Ship Operations – Insights from Other Domains , 2015 .

[17]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Monica Lundh,et al.  From Desk to Field - Human Factor Issues in Remote Monitoring and Controlling of Autonomous Unmanned Vessels☆ , 2015 .

[19]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  An Offshore Risk Analysis Method Using Fuzzy Bayesian Network , 2009 .

[20]  Bin Ran,et al.  Understanding Individualization Driving States via Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model , 2019, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[21]  Rabiul Islam,et al.  Development of a monograph for human error likelihood assessment in marine operations , 2017 .

[22]  Atul Gupta,et al.  Validating THERP: Assessing the scope of a full-scale validation of the Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction , 2015 .

[23]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  System-theoretic approach to safety of remotely-controlled merchant vessel , 2018 .

[24]  P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder,et al.  Multi-attribute decision-making method for prioritizing maritime traffic safety influencing factors of autonomous ships’ maneuvering decisions using grey and fuzzy theories , 2019, Safety Science.

[25]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Use of HFACS and fault tree model for collision risk factors analysis of icebreaker assistance in ice-covered waters , 2019, Safety Science.

[26]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Human Fatigue’s Effect on the Risk of Maritime Groundings - A Bayesian Network Modeling Approach , 2014 .

[27]  Emery Roe,et al.  High reliability management and control operator risks in autonomous marine systems and operations , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[28]  I Jenkinson,et al.  A methodology to model causal relationships on offshore safety assessment focusing on human and organizational factors. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[29]  Paul Amyotte,et al.  Determination of human error probabilities in maintenance procedures of a pump , 2014 .

[30]  Brian Veitch,et al.  An operational risk analysis tool to analyze marine transportation in Arctic waters , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Tuqiang Zhou,et al.  Analysis of commercial truck drivers' potentially dangerous driving behaviors based on 11-month digital tachograph data and multilevel modeling approach. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Stein Haugen,et al.  Assessing ship risk model applicability to Marine Autonomous Surface Ships , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[33]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  A Bayesian Network risk model for assessing oil spill recovery effectiveness in the ice-covered Northern Baltic Sea. , 2019, Marine pollution bulletin.

[34]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  A quantitative approach for risk assessment of a ship stuck in ice in Arctic waters , 2017, Safety Science.

[35]  Zhang Mingyang,et al.  Safety distance modeling for ship escort operations in Arctic ice-covered waters , 2017 .

[36]  Chaozhong Wu,et al.  Incorporating CREAM and MCS into fault tree analysis of LNG carrier spill accidents , 2017 .

[37]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Determination of human error probabilities for the maintenance operations of marine engines , 2016 .

[38]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  BN-SLIM: A Bayesian Network methodology for human reliability assessment based on Success Likelihood Index Method (SLIM) , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  Faisal Khan,et al.  A hybrid human reliability assessment technique for the maintenance operations of marine and offshore systems , 2020 .

[40]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Eliciting Subjective Probabilities through Pair‐wise Comparisons , 2017 .

[41]  Bing Wu,et al.  Autonomous decision-making scheme for multi-ship collision avoidance with iterative observation and inference , 2020 .

[42]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Towards a probabilistic model for predicting ship besetting in ice in Arctic waters , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  Ørnulf Jan Rødseth,et al.  Risk Assessment for an Unmanned Merchant Ship , 2015 .

[44]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  A dynamic human reliability model for marine and offshore operations in harsh environments , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[45]  Ahmed O. Babaleye,et al.  Marine accident learning with fuzzy cognitive maps (MALFCMs) , 2019, Safety in Extreme Environments.

[46]  J. Vanhatalo,et al.  Estimating the acute impacts of Arctic marine oil spills using expert elicitation. , 2018, Marine pollution bulletin.

[47]  Yi He,et al.  Visualization Analysis of Intelligent Vehicles Research Field Based on Mapping Knowledge Domain , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[48]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  An integrated method for human error probability assessment during the maintenance of offshore facilities , 2015 .