Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic experiments.

A common mistake in biomagnetic experimentation is the assumption that Helmholtz coils provide uniform magnetic fields; this is true only for a limited volume at their center. Substantial improvements on this design have been made during the past 140 years with systems of three, four, and five coils. Numerical comparisons of the field uniformity generated by these designs are made here, along with a table of construction details and recommendations for their use in experiments in which large volumes of uniform intensity magnetic exposures are needed. Double-wrapping, or systems of bifilar windings, can also help control for the non-magnetic effects of the electric coils used in many experiments. In this design, each coil is wrapped in parallel with two separate, adjacent strands of copper wire, rather than the single strand used normally. If currents are flowing in antiparallel directions, the magnetic fields generated by each strand will cancel and yield virtually no external magnetic field, whereas parallel currents will yield an external field. Both cases will produce similar non-magnetic effects of ohmic heating, and simple measures can reduce the small vibration and electric field differences. Control experiments can then be designed such that the only major difference between treated and untreated groups is the presence or absence of the magnetic field. Double-wrapped coils also facilitate the use of truly double-blind protocol, as the same apparatus can be used either for experimental or control groups.

[1]  Sidney M. Rubens,et al.  Cube‐Surface Coil for Producing a Uniform Magnetic Field , 1945 .

[2]  I. Scollar,et al.  Square cross section coils for the production of uniform magnetic fields , 1967 .

[3]  J. Kirschvink,et al.  Magnetite biomineralization in the human brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Adair,et al.  Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[5]  G. Stroink,et al.  Uniform magnetic field produced by three, four, and five square coils , 1983 .

[6]  Michael M. Walker,et al.  Short Cummunication: Honeybees can be Trained to Respond to very Small Changes in Geomagnetic Field Intensity , 1989 .

[7]  Arthur H. Firester,et al.  Design of Square Helmholtz Coil Systems , 1966 .

[8]  J. L. Gould,et al.  Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals. , 1981, Bio Systems.

[9]  M E Bitterman,et al.  Conditioning analysis of magnetoreception in honeybees. , 1989, Bioelectromagnetics.

[10]  J. Kirschvink Magnetite biomineralization and geomagnetic sensitivity in higher animals: an update and recommendations for future study. , 1989, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  Joseph L. Kirschvink,et al.  Is Geomagnetic Sensitivity Real? Replication of the Walker-Bitterman Magnetic Conditioning Experiment in Honey Bees , 1991 .

[12]  D. Edwards,et al.  A large volume magnetic field free space for thermal demagnetization and other experiments in palaeomagnetism , 1971 .