Effects of the In-Cylinder Environment on Diffusion Flame Lift-Off in a DI Diesel Engine

The diffusion flame lift-off length of isolated, free diesel jets in quiescent atmospheres is known to have a strong influence on soot formation by affecting fuel/air mixing prior to combustion. In realistic engine environments, the proximity and temperature of in-cylinder surfaces, in-cylinder gas flows (swirl), and interactions between adjacent jets may affect the behavior of the flame lift-off, and thereby affect soot formation. To better understand the influence of these factors on the lift-off length and on soot formation, optical imaging diagnostics were employed to measure the flame lift-off length in an optically-accessible heavy-duty Direct Injection (DI) diesel engine. A two-camera OH chemiluminescence diagnostic was developed and employed to measure the flame lift-off length for a range of injector nozzle geometries and engine operating conditions. A two-camera OH Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (OH-PLIF) diagnostic for side-on illumination of the jet,was also developed and utilized to aid in the interpretation of the OH chemiluminescence data. The diesel flame lift-off lengths in the optical engine were shorter than those observed previously for single, isolated jets in a quiescent atmosphere. Also, high cycle-to-cycle variation was observed in the lift-off length data from the engine, yielding considerable uncertainty in most of the reported trends. However, on average, the lift-off length was 7% longer on the windward side of the jet relative to the weak in-cylinder swirl flow. The proximity of the firedeck to the jets (14° down-angle) did not cause preferential vertical asymmetry in the flame shape, on average. A reduction in the interjet spacing angle from 90° (i.e., 4-holes) to 45° (8-holes) was correlated with a 35% reduction in the lift-off length, along with decreased sensitivity to ambient gas temperature and density. The mechanism by which the proximity of adjacent jets affects the lift-off length was not firmly identified, but fluid mechanical/thermal coupling between jets and/or internal injector fuel flow characteristics may be important. In realistic Dl diesel engine environments, high cycle-to-cycle variability, decreased temperature dependence, and shortening of the lift-off length may hinder soot reduction methods that rely on manipulation of the mean flame lift-off length.

[1]  Y. Chao,et al.  A Study of the Interaction Between a Jet Flame and a Lateral Wall , 2000 .

[2]  Charles A. Amann,et al.  Classical Combustion Diagnostics for Engine Research , 1985 .

[3]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Scaling Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing-Limited Vaporization , 1999 .

[4]  Orifice Diameter Effects on Diesel Fuel Jet Flame Structure , 2001 .

[5]  R. E. Sonntag,et al.  Fundamentals of classical thermodynamics , 1973 .

[6]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Effect of Injector Nozzle Hole Size and Number on Spray Characteristics and the Performance of a Heavy Duty D.I. Diesel Engine , 1996 .

[7]  J. Abraham,et al.  Jet-Jet and Jet-Wall Interactions of Transient Jets from Multi-Hole Injectors , 1999 .

[8]  John E. Dec,et al.  OH radical imaging in a DI diesel engine and the structure of the early diffusion flame , 1996 .

[9]  S. Gollahalli,et al.  Effects of Interjet Spacing on Burning Multiple Sprays , 2001 .

[10]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[11]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Sprays Under Quiescent Conditions , 2001 .

[12]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Measurements of fuel effects on liquid-phase penetration in DI sprays , 1999 .

[13]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Measurement of the Flame Lift-Off Location on DI Diesel Sprays Using OH Chemiluminescence , 2001 .

[14]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays , 1998 .

[15]  Christoph Espey,et al.  The effect of TDC temperature and density on the liquid-phase fuel penetration in a D.I. Diesel engine , 1995 .

[16]  Ernest F. Hasselbrink,et al.  Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 2. Velocity and OH field imaging , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Christoph Espey,et al.  Diesel Engine Combustion Studies in a Newly Designed Optical-Access Engine Using High-Speed Visualization and 2-D Laser Imaging , 1993 .

[18]  M. Graboski,et al.  In-Use Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2000 .

[19]  H. Kosaka,et al.  Simultaneous 2-D imaging of OH radicals and soot in a diesel flame by laser sheet techniques , 1996 .

[20]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Cycle-Resolved LDV Measurements In a Motored Diesel Engine and Comparison with K-ε Model Predictions , 1989 .

[21]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Fuel Jets: Oxygen Concentration Effects , 2002 .

[22]  John E. Dec,et al.  Effects of Fuel Parameters and Diffusion Flame Lift-Off on Soot Formation in a Heavy-Duty DI Diesel Engine , 2002 .

[23]  P. G. Hill,et al.  Transient Turbulent Gaseous Fuel Jets for Diesel Engines , 1999 .

[24]  Anders Larsson,et al.  Optical Studies in a DI Diesel Engine , 1999 .

[25]  Patrick V. Farrell,et al.  Air Flow Characteristics Surrounding Evaporating Transient Diesel Sprays , 2002 .

[26]  Paul C. Miles,et al.  The Influence of Swirl on HSDI Diesel Combustion at Moderate Speed and Load , 2000 .

[27]  Structure of the Flow Field of a Nonpremixed Gas Jet Flame in Cross-Flow , 1997 .

[28]  J. Naber,et al.  Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays , 1996 .