Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams

The concept of collective efficacy within virtual teams has yet to be studied. This study developed and rigorously validated a domain-specific measure of collective efficacy, entitled virtual team efficacy, within a comprehensive research framework. Over a two-year period we collected field study data from multiple samples of information systems project teams—in all, 52 virtual teams comprising 318 students from the United States, Great Britain, and Hong Kong. As we hypothesized, group potency and computer collective efficacy act as antecedents to virtual team efficacy, and virtual team efficacy is in turn predictive of perceptual and objective measures of performance. Further, consistent with efficacy theory, we also find that virtual team efficacy acts on performance outcomes through specific mediating processes. This paper contributes to the academic and practitioner communities by providing a comprehensive model of virtual team efficacy and performance and by providing validated instrumentation that can be immediately applied during further research in this area.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Kelly L. Zellars,et al.  Beyond Self-Efficacy: Interactive Effects of Role Conflict and Perceived Collective Efficacy , 2001 .

[3]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. , 1983 .

[4]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[5]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, Second Edition , 2000 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 1996, ICIS.

[7]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Managing Distance over Time: The Evolution of Technologies of Dis/Ambiguation , 2002 .

[11]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  An Inductively Derived Model of Leader-Initiated Relationship Building with Virtual Team Members , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Laurence Chalip,et al.  Assessing Group Efficacy , 2004 .

[15]  Blake Ives,et al.  Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  S. Kozub,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Cohesion and Collective Efficacy in Rugby Teams , 2000 .

[17]  Amy E. Randel,et al.  Understanding Group Efficacy , 2000 .

[18]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[19]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[21]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[22]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[23]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Can absence make a team grow stronger? , 2004, Harvard business review.

[25]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work over the Centuries: Trust and Control in the Hudson's Bay Company, 1670–1826 , 2002 .

[27]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  L. Parker,et al.  Working Together: Perceived Self- and Collective-Efficacy at the Workplace1 , 1994 .

[29]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[30]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[31]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[32]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Collaborative Conflict Management Style in Group Support System-Based Global Virtual Teams , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Steve M. Jex,et al.  Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study , 1992 .

[34]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[35]  C. Gibson.  Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures , 1999 .

[36]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[38]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  Diane F. Baker,et al.  The Development of Collective Efficacy in Small Task Groups , 2001 .

[40]  D. Robey,et al.  Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization , 1998 .

[41]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[45]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  New Product Development Decision-Making Effectiveness: Comparing Individuals, Face-To-Face Teams, and Virtual Teams , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[46]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[48]  David L. Paul,et al.  Collaborative Activities in Virtual Settings: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Telemedicine , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions , 1987 .

[50]  A. Pescosolido,et al.  Informal Leaders and the Development of Group Efficacy , 2001 .

[51]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The Phenomenology of Conflict in Distributed Work Teams , 2002 .

[52]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[53]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  EAST MEETS WEST MEETS MIDEAST: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF COLLECTIVISTIC AND INDIVIDUALISTIC WORK GROUPS. , 1991 .

[54]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[55]  M MarakasGeorge,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy , 1998 .

[56]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Research Report: The Role of Behavioral Modeling in Computer Skills Acquisition: Toward Refinement of the Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement-Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups , 2002 .

[59]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. , 1997 .

[60]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[61]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Group Potency and Collective Efficacy , 2003 .

[62]  N. Panteli,et al.  The role of subgroups in the communication patterns of global virtual teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[63]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[65]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  A. Bandura.  GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[67]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[68]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[69]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[70]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[71]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .