The timing of the reflected wave in the ascending aortic pressure predicts restenosis after coronary stent placement.

It has been reported that the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure is associated with systemic arterial stiffness. Stiffening of the aortic walls leads to a decrease in coronary perfusion and an increase in restenosis rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure could be used to predict restenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting. One hundred and three patients who underwent percutaneous coronary stenting were enrolled in this study. We measured the inflection time and augmentation index (AIx) to determine the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure at angioplasty. We then prospectively investigated the effect of inflection time and AIx in relation to the subsequent risk of restenosis after coronary stenting. After adjustments for age, gender, smoking habits, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, stent size, and heart rate, the odds ratio of restenosis in inflection time was 4.62 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 15.4) for the lowest tertile of the inflection time level compared with the highest tertile level. As for AIx, the odds ratio of restenosis was 6.96 (95% CI, 1.93 to 25.1) for the highest tertile of the AIx level compared with the lowest tertile level. Inflection time and AIx are related to restenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting.

[1]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Predictors of diffuse and aggressive intra-stent restenosis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Saito,et al.  Primary stent implantation without coumadin in acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Yuji Koide,et al.  High brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is an independent predictor of the presence of coronary artery disease in men. , 2004, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[5]  A. Becker,et al.  Neointimal tissue response at sites of coronary stenting in humans: macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. , 1998, Circulation.

[6]  F. Prati,et al.  In-stent neointimal proliferation correlates with the amount of residual plaque burden outside the stent: an intravascular ultrasound study. , 1999, Circulation.

[7]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  C Di Mario,et al.  Stenting after optimal lesion debulking (sold) registry. Angiographic and clinical outcome. , 1998, Circulation.

[9]  C. Hayward,et al.  Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. , 1989, Circulation.

[10]  J. Nürnberger,et al.  Augmentation index is associated with cardiovascular risk , 2002, Journal of hypertension.

[11]  A. Yamashina,et al.  Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a marker of atherosclerotic vascular damage and cardiovascular risk. , 2003, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[12]  A. Yeung,et al.  Accuracy of Electronic Digital Calipers Compared With Quantitative Angiography in Measuring Coronary Arterial Diameter , 1993, Circulation.

[13]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction , 1998 .

[14]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  D. Baim,et al.  Mechanisms of restenosis and redilation within coronary stents--quantitative angiographic assessment. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  AlbertSchömig,et al.  Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement , 1998 .

[17]  M. Leon,et al.  Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. , 1996, Circulation.

[18]  J. Yoshikawa,et al.  Inflection point of ascending aortic waveform is a powerful predictor of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 2002, American journal of hypertension.

[19]  K. Sagawa,et al.  Stroke volume effect of changing arterial input impedance over selected frequency ranges. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  Tomoshige Hayashi,et al.  Reflection in the arterial system and the risk of coronary heart disease. , 2002, American journal of hypertension.

[21]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. , 1998, Circulation.

[22]  C. Bauters,et al.  Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels. , 1997, Circulation.

[23]  Thomas Weber,et al.  Arterial Stiffness, Wave Reflections, and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease , 2004, Circulation.

[24]  J. Tobis,et al.  Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  M. Iida,et al.  Usefulness of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement: correlation with abdominal aortic calcification. , 2003, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[26]  Bruce R. Brodie,et al.  Prospective, multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction : In-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial , 1998 .