Continuous wound infiltration of bupivacaine at two different anatomical planes for caesarean analgesia – A randomised clinical trial

Background and Aims: Continuous wound infiltration of local anaesthetics provide postoperative analgesia by peripheral nociceptors blockade. The placement of wound infiltration catheter in the optimal anatomical plane of surgical wound may play a significant role in reducing postoperative pain depends on the surgical procedure. We hypothesised that preperitoneal infusion of local anaesthetics will reduce the postoperative opioid consumption as compared to subcutaneous infusion following cesarean section. Methods: This was a randomised, double-blinded clinical trial. Fifty-two pregnant women who underwent lower segment caesarean section by Pfannensteil incision, under spinal anaesthesia, were randomised to group 'subcutaneous' and group 'preperitoneal'. A wound infiltration catheter was placed in the subcutaneous or preperitoneal plane, depending on their randomisation at the end of the surgery. Bupivacaine of 0.25% at 5 mL/h was infused for the next 48 h. Pain was assessed using numerical rating scale at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after surgery. Cumulative postoperative consumption and adverse effects of morphine and complications of the procedure were looked for. Results: Cumulative 48-h morphine consumption showed no statistical significance between the preperitoneal group (15.96 ± 7.69 mg) and subcutaneous group (21.26 ± 11.03 mg); P = 0.058. Pain score was comparable. Independent T-test and Mann–Whitney test were the statistical tests used for continuous and categorical data, respectively. Conclusion: Postoperative cumulative morphine consumption and pain scores are comparable when bupivacaine is infused continuously through wound infiltration catheter either in the preperitoneal or subcutaneous layer following Caesarean delivery.

[1]  T. Yılmazlar,et al.  Preperitoneal catheter analgesia is an effective method for pain management after colorectal surgery: the results of 100 consecutive patients , 2014, Local and regional anesthesia.

[2]  L. Berggren,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the efficacy of wound catheters for post‐operative pain management , 2011, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  A. L. Kauling,et al.  [Postoperative analgesia: comparing continuous epidural catheter infusion of local anesthetic and opioid and continuous wound catheter infusion of local anesthetic]. , 2011, Revista brasileira de anestesiologia.

[4]  M. Beaussier,et al.  Improving Continuous Wound Infusion Effectiveness for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  K. Katircioglu,et al.  Bupivacaine Infusion Above or Below the Fascia for Postoperative Pain Treatment After Abdominal Hysterectomy , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  M. Beaussier,et al.  Continuous Preperitoneal Infusion of Ropivacaine Provides Effective Analgesia and Accelerates Recovery after Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[7]  N. Meyer,et al.  A randomized trial of postoperative wound irrigation with local anesthetic for pain after cesarean delivery. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  M. Humphrey,et al.  Efficacy of Bupivacaine Delivered by Wound Catheter for Post‐Caesarean Section Analgesia , 1995, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[9]  J. Dungan Ropivacaine Continuous Wound Infusion Versus Epidural Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012 .