Mixing Oil with Water: Framing and Theorizing in Management Research Informed by Design Science

Design science (DS) approaches have been emerging in engineering, management and other disciplines operating at the interface between design research and the natural or social sciences. Research informed by DS is challenging because it involves “mixing oil with water”, using a famous phrase of Herbert Simon. A key challenge here is the dual role of theory: one can develop a “theory of” any empirical phenomenon to explain its characteristics and outcomes, or alternatively, develop a “theory for” generating this phenomenon, focused on solving problems and enlarging possibilities. To clearly distinguish these two perspectives, we talk about theorizing in relation to theory-of and framing related to theory-for. A state-of-the-art review of how DS is applied by management researchers results in two main findings. First, explicit (re)framing efforts appear to be highly instrumental in challenging a given theoretical paradigm and thereby reduce the risk of being constrained to it; these findings confirm the generative nature of design activity. Moreover, many studies reviewed draw on knowledge formats that synthesize descriptive-explanatory and prescriptive-normative knowledge. Our main findings are subsequently integrated into a DS methodology, which may especially be of interest to design-oriented disciplines that tend to adopt a rather intuitive (undefined) notion of theory.

[1]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design theory at Bauhaus: teaching “splitting” knowledge , 2016 .

[2]  Mats Engwall,et al.  Dealing with the Devil of Deviation: Managing Uncertainty During Product Development Execution , 2014 .

[3]  J.-C. Spender,et al.  Herbert a. Simon on What Ails Business Schools: More than ‘A Problem in Organizational Design’ , 2012 .

[4]  I. Niiniluoto The aim and structure of applied research , 1993 .

[5]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[6]  Davide Quaglione,et al.  The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy , 2016 .

[7]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Developing actionable knowledge on value crafting: a design science approach , 2016 .

[8]  Erik W. Monsen,et al.  Follow the leader or the pack? Regulatory focus and academic entrepreneurial intentions , 2017 .

[9]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  Models of Start-up Thinking and Action: Theoretical, Empirical and Pedagogical Approaches , 2016 .

[10]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  The production of knowledge : the challenge of social science research , 2006 .

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN , 1967 .

[12]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[13]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering , 2017, Research in Engineering Design.

[14]  Jeremy Faludi,et al.  A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments , 2020 .

[15]  Yoram Reich,et al.  The principle of reflexive practice , 2017, Design Science.

[16]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research 1 , 2022 .

[17]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Designing Decisions in the Unknown: A Generative Model , 2018, European Management Review.

[18]  Juan Xu,et al.  Identifying, analyzing, and finding solutions to the sales lead black hole: A design science approach , 2020 .

[19]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .

[20]  D. Denyer,et al.  Designing safer working interventions through a literature review using a mechanisms-based approach , 2019, Safety Science.

[21]  M. Smith Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .

[22]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  Addressing the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models by prototyping: A tool for planning and executing small-scale pilots , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Jaakko Kuorikoski,et al.  Looping Kinds and Social Mechanisms , 2012 .

[26]  D. Rousseau Designing a Better Business School: Channelling Herbert Simon, Addressing the Critics, and Developing Actionable Knowledge for Professionalizing Managers , 2012 .

[27]  Pascal Le Masson,et al.  The Value of a 'Failed' R&D Project: An Emerging Evaluation Framework for Building Innovative Capabilities , 2009 .

[28]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Design Logic and the Ambiguity Operator , 2010, DESRIST.

[29]  John Burgoyne,et al.  Towards Best or Better Practice in Corporate Leadership Development: Operational Issues in Mode 2 and Design Science Research , 2006 .

[30]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future , 2011 .

[32]  Isabelle M. M. J. Reymen,et al.  Searching for Partners in Open Innovation Settings: How to Overcome the Constraints of Local Search , 2018 .

[33]  Myriam Cloodt,et al.  Design Principles for Corporate Venture Transition Processes in Established Technology Firms , 2012 .

[34]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  Designing and Testing an OD Intervention , 2007 .

[35]  Georges Romme,et al.  Creating University Spinoffs : A Science-Based Design Perspective , 2009 .

[36]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[37]  A. Romme,et al.  Toward Science-Based Design in Organization Development , 2007 .

[38]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Designing Business Models and Similar Strategic Objects: The Contribution of IS , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[40]  Miia Chabot,et al.  Protecting franchise chains against weather risk: A design science approach , 2021 .

[41]  H. Willmott,et al.  Embedded Agency in Institutional Theory: Problem or Paradox? , 2019, Academy of Management Review.

[42]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Identifying design principles for business incubation in the European space sector , 2019, Journal of Business Venturing Insights.

[43]  Neil Gross A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms , 2009 .

[44]  C. H. Dorst,et al.  Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design , 2015 .

[45]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  R. Suddaby Editor's Comments: Why Theory? , 2014 .

[47]  Rodolphe Durand,et al.  Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage , 2009 .

[48]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Designing Management Education:Practice What You Teach , 2003 .

[49]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[50]  Mustafa Emirbayer What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[51]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Bridging Social Constraint and Social Action to Design Organizations for Innovation , 2008 .

[52]  P. Hedström,et al.  Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences , 2010 .

[53]  Yoram Reich,et al.  The PSI Framework and Theory of Design , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[54]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice , 1992 .

[55]  Raymond Opdenakker,et al.  Effective virtual project teams : a design science approach to building a strategic momentum , 2019 .

[56]  Karen Locke,et al.  Constructing Opportunities for Contribution: Structuring Intertextual Coherence and “Problematizing” in Organizational Studies , 1997 .

[57]  A. Romme,et al.  Domination, Self-Determination and Circular Organizing , 1999 .

[58]  Judith Hills,et al.  The semantic turn: A new foundation for design , 2008 .

[59]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning , 2008 .

[60]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[61]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Advancing service design research with design science research , 2019 .

[62]  K. Tanskanen,et al.  Towards evidence-based management of external resources: Developing design propositions and future research avenues through research synthesis , 2017 .

[63]  Franziska Hoffmann,et al.  Fact Fiction And Forecast , 2016 .

[64]  Cannon Dj The National Health Service in England. , 1949 .

[65]  Ted Baker,et al.  Bridging the valley of death: lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education , 2009 .

[66]  Zur Shapira,et al.  “I've Got a Theory Paper---Do You?”: Conceptual, Empirical, and Theoretical Contributions to Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences , 2011 .

[67]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[68]  P. Plsek,et al.  Practical Methods for Extracting Explicit Design Rules Grounded in the Experience of Organizational Managers , 2007 .

[69]  Taewon Suh,et al.  Developing a digital marketing tool for ethnic ventures' mixed business model and market-shaping: A design scientific approach of web demographics , 2021 .

[70]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis , 2008 .

[71]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[72]  Amandine Pascal,et al.  Developing a Human‐Centred and Science‐Based Approach to Design: The Knowledge Management Platform Project , 2013 .

[73]  J. Groenewegen From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession , 2009 .

[74]  B. Leca,et al.  How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[75]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Off to Plan or Out to Lunch? Relationships between Design Characteristics and Outcomes of Strategy Workshops , 2015 .

[76]  D. Watts Should social science be more solution-oriented? , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[77]  A. Romme,et al.  Towards Common Ground and Trading Zones in Management Research and Practice , 2015 .

[78]  Lisa Carlgren,et al.  The Challenges of Using Design Thinking in Industry – Experiences from Five Large Firms , 2016 .

[79]  Ivano Cardinale Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory , 2017 .

[80]  Karen Williams Middleton,et al.  Venture Creation Programs: Bridging Entrepreneurship Education and Technology Transfer. , 2015 .

[81]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .

[82]  Karen Locke,et al.  Perspective - Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[83]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Science and design methodology: A review , 1993 .

[84]  Paul Bate,et al.  Using a Design Approach to Assist Large-Scale Organizational Change , 2007 .

[85]  B. Pentland Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[86]  C. E. M. JOAD,et al.  Aristotle's Metaphysics. , 1925, Nature.

[87]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .

[88]  H. Rahmandad,et al.  Explaining Heterogeneity in the Organization of Scientific Work , 2019, Organization Science.

[89]  Roy Suddaby,et al.  Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Where are the New Theories of Organization? , 2011 .

[90]  Michael Reinhard,et al.  Models Of My Life , 2016 .

[91]  Sophie Hooge,et al.  Gambling Versus Designing: Organizing for the Design of the Probability Space in the Energy Sector , 2016 .

[92]  Dimo Dimov,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[93]  A. Romme,et al.  The Formation of Fairness Perceptions in the Cooperation between Entrepreneurs and Universities , 2013 .

[94]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[95]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The power of modularity , 2000 .

[96]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[97]  M. Janssens,et al.  A Practice-Based Theory of Diversity: Respecifying (In)Equality in Organizations , 2019, Academy of Management Review.

[98]  Erving Goffman,et al.  Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. , 1979 .

[99]  A. Romme,et al.  Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[100]  Yoram Reich,et al.  We Are Not Users: Dialogues, Diversity, and Design , 2020 .