Mixing Oil with Water: Framing and Theorizing in Management Research Informed by Design Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Armand Hatchuel,et al. Design theory at Bauhaus: teaching “splitting” knowledge , 2016 .
[2] Mats Engwall,et al. Dealing with the Devil of Deviation: Managing Uncertainty During Product Development Execution , 2014 .
[3] J.-C. Spender,et al. Herbert a. Simon on What Ails Business Schools: More than ‘A Problem in Organizational Design’ , 2012 .
[4] I. Niiniluoto. The aim and structure of applied research , 1993 .
[5] S. Kraemer. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.
[6] Davide Quaglione,et al. The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy , 2016 .
[7] A. Georges L. Romme,et al. Developing actionable knowledge on value crafting: a design science approach , 2016 .
[8] Erik W. Monsen,et al. Follow the leader or the pack? Regulatory focus and academic entrepreneurial intentions , 2017 .
[9] Jerome A. Katz,et al. Models of Start-up Thinking and Action: Theoretical, Empirical and Pedagogical Approaches , 2016 .
[10] William H. Starbuck,et al. The production of knowledge : the challenge of social science research , 2006 .
[11] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN , 1967 .
[12] J. Aken. Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .
[13] Armand Hatchuel,et al. Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering , 2017, Research in Engineering Design.
[14] Jeremy Faludi,et al. A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments , 2020 .
[15] Yoram Reich,et al. The principle of reflexive practice , 2017, Design Science.
[16] Jan Pries-Heje,et al. A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research 1 , 2022 .
[17] Armand Hatchuel,et al. Designing Decisions in the Unknown: A Generative Model , 2018, European Management Review.
[18] Juan Xu,et al. Identifying, analyzing, and finding solutions to the sales lead black hole: A design science approach , 2020 .
[19] Nile W. Hatch,et al. Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .
[20] D. Denyer,et al. Designing safer working interventions through a literature review using a mechanisms-based approach , 2019, Safety Science.
[21] M. Smith. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .
[22] Yves Pigneur,et al. Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[23] Erik Jan Hultink,et al. Addressing the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models by prototyping: A tool for planning and executing small-scale pilots , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[24] A. Georges L. Romme,et al. Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..
[25] Jaakko Kuorikoski,et al. Looping Kinds and Social Mechanisms , 2012 .
[26] D. Rousseau. Designing a Better Business School: Channelling Herbert Simon, Addressing the Critics, and Developing Actionable Knowledge for Professionalizing Managers , 2012 .
[27] Pascal Le Masson,et al. The Value of a 'Failed' R&D Project: An Emerging Evaluation Framework for Building Innovative Capabilities , 2009 .
[28] Jan Pries-Heje,et al. Design Logic and the Ambiguity Operator , 2010, DESRIST.
[29] John Burgoyne,et al. Towards Best or Better Practice in Corporate Leadership Development: Operational Issues in Mode 2 and Design Science Research , 2006 .
[30] Salvatore T. March,et al. Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..
[31] S. Venkataraman,et al. Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future , 2011 .
[32] Isabelle M. M. J. Reymen,et al. Searching for Partners in Open Innovation Settings: How to Overcome the Constraints of Local Search , 2018 .
[33] Myriam Cloodt,et al. Design Principles for Corporate Venture Transition Processes in Established Technology Firms , 2012 .
[34] Daniel Andriessen,et al. Designing and Testing an OD Intervention , 2007 .
[35] Georges Romme,et al. Creating University Spinoffs : A Science-Based Design Perspective , 2009 .
[36] Jan Holmström,et al. Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..
[37] A. Romme,et al. Toward Science-Based Design in Organization Development , 2007 .
[38] Yves Pigneur,et al. Designing Business Models and Similar Strategic Objects: The Contribution of IS , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[39] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .
[40] Miia Chabot,et al. Protecting franchise chains against weather risk: A design science approach , 2021 .
[41] H. Willmott,et al. Embedded Agency in Institutional Theory: Problem or Paradox? , 2019, Academy of Management Review.
[42] J. Cornelissen,et al. Identifying design principles for business incubation in the European space sector , 2019, Journal of Business Venturing Insights.
[43] Neil Gross. A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms , 2009 .
[44] C. H. Dorst,et al. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design , 2015 .
[45] Mustafa Emirbayer,et al. What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.
[46] R. Suddaby. Editor's Comments: Why Theory? , 2014 .
[47] Rodolphe Durand,et al. Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage , 2009 .
[48] A. Georges L. Romme,et al. Designing Management Education:Practice What You Teach , 2003 .
[49] E. Shils. The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .
[50] Mustafa Emirbayer. What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .
[51] Deborah Dougherty,et al. Bridging Social Constraint and Social Action to Design Organizations for Innovation , 2008 .
[52] P. Hedström,et al. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences , 2010 .
[53] Yoram Reich,et al. The PSI Framework and Theory of Design , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[54] Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al. Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice , 1992 .
[55] Raymond Opdenakker,et al. Effective virtual project teams : a design science approach to building a strategic momentum , 2019 .
[56] Karen Locke,et al. Constructing Opportunities for Contribution: Structuring Intertextual Coherence and “Problematizing” in Organizational Studies , 1997 .
[57] A. Romme,et al. Domination, Self-Determination and Circular Organizing , 1999 .
[58] Judith Hills,et al. The semantic turn: A new foundation for design , 2008 .
[59] Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al. Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning , 2008 .
[60] R. J. Bogumil,et al. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[61] Tuure Tuunanen,et al. Advancing service design research with design science research , 2019 .
[62] K. Tanskanen,et al. Towards evidence-based management of external resources: Developing design propositions and future research avenues through research synthesis , 2017 .
[63] Franziska Hoffmann,et al. Fact Fiction And Forecast , 2016 .
[64] Cannon Dj. The National Health Service in England. , 1949 .
[65] Ted Baker,et al. Bridging the valley of death: lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education , 2009 .
[66] Zur Shapira,et al. “I've Got a Theory Paper---Do You?”: Conceptual, Empirical, and Theoretical Contributions to Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences , 2011 .
[67] Armand Hatchuel,et al. C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .
[68] P. Plsek,et al. Practical Methods for Extracting Explicit Design Rules Grounded in the Experience of Organizational Managers , 2007 .
[69] Taewon Suh,et al. Developing a digital marketing tool for ethnic ventures' mixed business model and market-shaping: A design scientific approach of web demographics , 2021 .
[70] D. Tranfield,et al. Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis , 2008 .
[71] K. Weick. Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .
[72] Amandine Pascal,et al. Developing a Human‐Centred and Science‐Based Approach to Design: The Knowledge Management Platform Project , 2013 .
[73] J. Groenewegen. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession , 2009 .
[74] B. Leca,et al. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship , 2009 .
[75] Richard Whittington,et al. Off to Plan or Out to Lunch? Relationships between Design Characteristics and Outcomes of Strategy Workshops , 2015 .
[76] D. Watts. Should social science be more solution-oriented? , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.
[77] A. Romme,et al. Towards Common Ground and Trading Zones in Management Research and Practice , 2015 .
[78] Lisa Carlgren,et al. The Challenges of Using Design Thinking in Industry – Experiences from Five Large Firms , 2016 .
[79] Ivano Cardinale. Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory , 2017 .
[80] Karen Williams Middleton,et al. Venture Creation Programs: Bridging Entrepreneurship Education and Technology Transfer. , 2015 .
[81] Armand Hatchuel,et al. Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .
[82] Karen Locke,et al. Perspective - Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[83] Nigel Cross,et al. Science and design methodology: A review , 1993 .
[84] Paul Bate,et al. Using a Design Approach to Assist Large-Scale Organizational Change , 2007 .
[85] B. Pentland. Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .
[86] C. E. M. JOAD,et al. Aristotle's Metaphysics. , 1925, Nature.
[87] Ranjay Gulati,et al. Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .
[88] H. Rahmandad,et al. Explaining Heterogeneity in the Organization of Scientific Work , 2019, Organization Science.
[89] Roy Suddaby,et al. Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Where are the New Theories of Organization? , 2011 .
[90] Michael Reinhard,et al. Models Of My Life , 2016 .
[91] Sophie Hooge,et al. Gambling Versus Designing: Organizing for the Design of the Probability Space in the Energy Sector , 2016 .
[92] Dimo Dimov,et al. Toward a Design Science of Entrepreneurship , 2016 .
[93] A. Romme,et al. The Formation of Fairness Perceptions in the Cooperation between Entrepreneurs and Universities , 2013 .
[94] A. Georges L. Romme,et al. Special Issue: Organizational Design: Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[95] Kim B. Clark,et al. The power of modularity , 2000 .
[96] E. Goffman. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .
[97] M. Janssens,et al. A Practice-Based Theory of Diversity: Respecifying (In)Equality in Organizations , 2019, Academy of Management Review.
[98] Erving Goffman,et al. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. , 1979 .
[99] A. Romme,et al. Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship , 2014 .
[100] Yoram Reich,et al. We Are Not Users: Dialogues, Diversity, and Design , 2020 .