Liquefaction Potential Map for Charleston, South Carolina

The liquefaction potential of saturated cohesionless deposits in Charleston, South Carolina, was evaluated probabilistically. The map is a combination of liquefaction susceptibility and liquefaction opportunity. Critical acceleration, the measure of liquefaction susceptibility, was obtained using the simplified empirical method developed by Seed and his coworkers. This method is based on the empirical relationship between standard penetration resistance and cyclic stress ratio. The liquefaction opportunity is determined by modeling zones of different seismic threat. The probability of liquefaction is computed by comparing the acceleration at the site to that required to cause liquefaction. Results are expressed as maps of zones of different risk levels and through a normalized liquefaction resistance index of the probability of liquefaction. Over 200 boring logs from peninsular Charleston were examined, showing the soil variability in the study area. This variability is due to the large amount of filling that took place over 300 years to reclaim land from the sea, swamps, and creeks that covered much of the original peninsula. The results indicate peninsular Charleston has a moderate liquefaction potential.

[1]  O. Nuttli,et al.  The relation between felt area and magnitude for central United States earthquakes , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  B. Szabo.  Uranium-series dating of fossil corals from marine sediments of southeastern United States Atlantic Coastal Plain , 1985 .

[3]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Laboratory Standard Penetration Tests on Fine Sands , 1977 .

[4]  Robin K. McGuire,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION INTO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION CHARACTERISTICS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 1987 .

[5]  W. D. Liam Finn,et al.  Simple Computation of Liquefaction Probability for Seismic Hazard Applications , 1984 .

[6]  T. Leslie Youd,et al.  Mapping of Liquefaction Severity Index , 1987 .

[7]  David J. Elton,et al.  Fuzzy logic for estimation of earthquake intensity based on building damage records , 1986 .

[8]  P. Talwani,et al.  Paleoseismic Evidence for Recurrence of Earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina , 1985, Science.

[9]  C. Cornell.  Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[10]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Average seismic source-parameter relations for mid-plate earthquakes , 1983 .

[11]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Magnitude-recurrence relation for central Mississippi Valley earthquakes , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  Pradeep Talwani,et al.  Internally consistent pattern of seismicity near Charleston, South Carolina , 1982 .

[13]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Strong Motion Attenuation Relations: A Ten-Year Perspective , 1985 .

[14]  G. Bollinger.  Seismicity of the southeastern United States , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  S. F. Obermeier,et al.  Geologic Evidence for Recurrent Moderate to Large Earthquakes Near Charleston, South Carolina , 1985, Science.

[16]  D. Rankin.  Studies related to the Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake of 1886; a preliminary report , 1977 .

[17]  E. M. Lemon,et al.  Geologic map of the Ladson quadrangle, Berkeley, Charleston, and Dorchester Counties, South Carolina , 1988 .

[18]  D. Keefer.  Landslides caused by earthquakes , 1984 .

[19]  Edward Kavazanjian,et al.  Liquefaction Potential Mapping for San Francisco , 1985 .

[20]  T L Youd,et al.  MAPPING LIQUEFACTIONINDUCED GROUND FAILURE POTENTIAL , 1978 .

[21]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Closure of "Soil Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Evaluation for Level Ground during Earthquakes" , 1979 .

[22]  Riley M. Chung,et al.  Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations , 1985 .

[23]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data , 1983 .

[24]  J. H. Schmertmann.  Measurement of insitu shear strength : Proc Conference on In-situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Raleigh, NC, 1–4 June 1975, V2, P57–138, disc P139–179 , 1978 .

[25]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  EMPIRICAL CORRELATION OF SOIL LIQUEFACTION BASED ON SPT N-VALUE AND FINES CONTENT , 1983 .

[26]  F. Tatsuoka,et al.  Soil Liquefaction Potential Evaluation with Use of the Simplified Procedure , 1981 .

[27]  G. A. Bollinger,et al.  On the relation between modified Mercalli intensity and body-wave magnitude , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.