Plant‐O‐Matic: a dynamic and mobile guide to all plants of the Americas

Advances in both informatics and mobile technology are providing exciting new opportunities for generating, disseminating, and engaging with information in the biological sciences at unprecedented spatial scales, particularly in disentangling information on the distributions and natural history of hyperdiverse groups of organisms. We describe an application serving as a mobile catalog of all of the plants of the Americas developed using species distribution models estimated from field observations of plant occurrences. The underlying data comprise over 3·5 million standardized observations of over 88 000 plant species. Plant‐O‐Matic, a free iOS application, combines the species distribution models with the location services built into a mobile device to provide users with a list of all plant species expected to occur in the 100 × 100 km geographic grid cell corresponding to the user's location. The application also provides ancillary information on species’ attributes (when available) including growth form, reproductive mode, flower color, and common name. Results can be searched and conditionally filtered based on these attributes. Links to externally sourced specimen images further aid in identification of species by the user. The application's ability to assemble locally relevant lists of plant species and their attributes on demand for anywhere in the Americas provides a powerful new tool for identifying, exploring, and understanding plant diversity. Mobile applications such as Plant‐O‐Matic can facilitate dynamic new approaches to science, conservation, and science education.

[1]  Mark Schildhauer,et al.  Cyberinfrastructure for an integrated botanical information network to investigate the ecological impacts of global climate change on plant biodiversity , 2016 .

[2]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  Patterns and drivers of plant functional group dominance across the Western Hemisphere: a macroecological re-assessment based on a massive botanical dataset , 2016 .

[3]  Gregory R. Goldsmith,et al.  The field guide, rebooted , 2015, Science.

[4]  C. Kemp Museums: The endangered dead , 2015, Nature.

[5]  Usda Nrcs The PLANTS Database , 2015 .

[6]  G. Goldsmith,et al.  Improving the efficacy of web-based educational outreach in ecology , 2014 .

[7]  Jens Kattge,et al.  The emergence and promise of functional biogeography , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Itheri Yahiaoui,et al.  Interactive plant identification based on social image data , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[9]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Richard Inger,et al.  Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  Boris Schröder,et al.  The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models , 2013 .

[12]  W. John Kress,et al.  Next-Generation Field Guides , 2013 .

[13]  Mark Schildhauer,et al.  Habitat area and climate stability determine geographical variation in plant species range sizes , 2013, Ecology letters.

[14]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Zhenyuan Lu,et al.  The taxonomic name resolution service: an online tool for automated standardization of plant names , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  M. Silman,et al.  Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought , 2011 .

[17]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  Determinants of palm species distributions across Africa: the relative roles of climate, non‐climatic environmental factors, and spatial constraints , 2010 .

[18]  Gretchen G. Moisen,et al.  A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and Kappa , 2008 .

[19]  Daniel A Griffith,et al.  Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. , 2006, Ecology.

[20]  Anna Halprin,et al.  Plant Identification: Creating User-Friendly Field Guides for Biodiversity Management , 2006 .

[21]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[22]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[23]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Tree species distributions in an upper Amazonian forest , 1999 .

[24]  E. G. Nolazco,et al.  Guía para el reconocimiento de los principales arboles del Alto Balsas , 1991 .