The Effect of Keyboard Key Spacing on Productivity, Usability, and Biomechanics in Touch Typists with Large Hands

International standards that specify the spacing between keys on a keyboard have been guided primarily by design convention. Experienced typists (N=37) with large hands typed on five keyboards with different horizontal and vertical key spacing (19x19, 18x19, 17x19, 16x19, and 17x17mm) while productivity, comfort ratings, left and right extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle forces, and right and left wrist extension and ulnar deviation were recorded. Productivity and usability ratings were significantly worse for the 16x19 keyboard. There was a trend for muscle activity to increase in the left forearm and decrease in the right forearm with decreasing horizontal key spacing. There was also a trend for left wrist extension to increase and left ulnar deviation to decrease with decreasing horizontal key spacing. The study findings support key spacing on a keyboard between 17 and 19mm. These findings may influence keyboard standards and design of keyboards.

[1]  Richard W Marklin,et al.  Effect of computer keyboard slope on wrist position and forearm electromyography of typists without musculoskeletal disorders. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[2]  D. Rempel,et al.  The effects of keyswitch stiffness on typing force, finger electromyography, and subjective discomfort. , 1999, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  Richard W. Daniels,et al.  Keyboard Design and Operation: A Review of the Major Issues , 1972 .

[4]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Muscular loading and subjective ratings of muscular tension by novices when typing with standard and split-design computer keyboards , 1992, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  R. L. Deininger.  Human factors engineering studies of the design and use of pushbutton telephone sets , 1960 .

[6]  Alan Barr,et al.  The Effect of Six Keyboard Designs on Wrist and Forearm Postures , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Alan Barr,et al.  Pinch force and forearm-muscle load during routine colonoscopy: a pilot study. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  D. Jindrich,et al.  Computer keyswitch force-displacement characteristics affect muscle activity patterns during index finger tapping. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  R Yoshitake.  Relationship between key space and user performance on reduced keyboards. , 1995, Applied human science : journal of physiological anthropology.

[10]  J C Rosecrance,et al.  Electromyographic effects of ergonomic modifications in selected meatpacking tasks. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Thomas M Greiner,et al.  Hand Anthropometry of U.S. Army Personnel , 1991 .

[12]  N. Murray.  Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer , 1995 .

[13]  S. T. Pheasant,et al.  Bodyspace : anthropometry, ergonomics and design , 1986 .

[14]  Rolf Ilg.  Ergonomic keyboard design , 1987 .

[15]  G. Harry McLaughlin,et al.  SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. , 1969 .

[16]  David Rempel,et al.  The Split Keyboard: An Ergonomics Success Story , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[17]  F. Gerr,et al.  Keyboard use and musculoskeletal outcomes among computer users , 2006, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[18]  Thomas J Armstrong,et al.  Short term and long term effects of enhanced auditory feedback on typing force, EMG, and comfort while typing. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Richard W. Marklin,et al.  Wrist and Forearm Postures of Users of Conventional Computer Keyboards , 1999, Hum. Factors.