Further observations on the distribution of acetylcholine‐reactive sites in skeletal muscle

It has been known since Langley's (1907) work that the sensitivity of a muscle to certain chemical stimuli shows striking differences along the fibre surface, the region of the neuromuscular junction being much more reactive than the rest of the fibre. Recently it has been found that marked changes can be produced in this distribution of chemoreceptive properties, for example, by complete or partial denervation and re-innervation of the muscle fibre (Ginetzinsky & Shamarina, 1942; Axelsson & Thesleff, 1959; Miledi, 1960a, c; Diamond & Miledi, 1962), and by direct muscle transection (Katz & Miledi, 1961 b). While extending this work we came across several additional observations. One is the degree of variability to be found among apparently normal muscle fibres: although the sensitivity to acetylcholine (ACh) at the myoneural junction is much higher than elsewhere, the low level to which the sensitivity falls in the extra-junctional region varies in different fibres over more than a thousandfold range, between less than 1/500,000 and approximately 1/100 of the maximum at the end-plate. Another observation was that the muscle-tendon junction often shows a separate peak of ACh sensitivity, much lower than that at the end-plate, but well above that of the rest of the fibre. This is of interest because of the local concentration of ACh-esterase which has been reported at myoneural and muscle-tendon junctions by Couteaux (1953), Gerebtzoff (1954) and Schwarzacher (1960b).

[1]  B. Katz,et al.  The development of acetylcholine sensitivity in nerve‐free segments of skeletal muscle , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R. Miledi,et al.  A study of foetal and new‐born rat muscle fibres , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  B. Katz,et al.  The localized action of ‘end‐plate drugs’ in the twitch fibres of the frog , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Miledi Properties of regenerating neuromuscular synapses in the frog , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  D. Jenkinson The antagonism between tubocurarine and substances which depolarize the motor end‐plate , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Miledi Junctional and extra‐junctional acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle fibres , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Miledi The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial denervation , 1960, The Journal of Physiology.

[8]  S. Thesleff,et al.  A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  B. Katz,et al.  A study of the ‘desensitization’ produced by acetylcholine at the motor end‐plate , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  B. Katz,et al.  The interaction between edrophonium (tensilon) and acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. , 1957, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[11]  B. Katz,et al.  A comparison of acetylcholine and stable depolarizing agents , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[12]  B. Katz,et al.  A study of curare action with an electrical micro-method , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[13]  H. Ruska,et al.  COMPARATIVE CYTOPHYSIOLOGY OF STRIATED MUSCLE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ROLE OF THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM , 1956, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[14]  B. Katz,et al.  On the localization of acetylcholine receptors , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  J. Welsh,et al.  The action of choline and related compounds on the heart of Venus mercenaria. , 1948, The Biological bulletin.

[16]  J. N. Langley On the contraction of muscle, chiefly in relation to the presence of ‘receptive’ substances , 1908, The Journal of physiology.