Evolution of dispersal in advective homogeneous environment: The effect of boundary conditions

Abstract We consider a single species model and a two-species competition model in a one-dimensional advective homogeneous environment. One interesting feature in these models concerns the boundary condition at the downstream end, where the species can be exposed to a net loss of individuals, as tuned by a parameter b which measures the magnitude of the loss. We first determine necessary and sufficient conditions for the persistence of a single species for general value of b, in terms of the critical habitat size and the critical advection rate. Then for the competition model, we assume that two species are identical except their random diffusion rates. We obtain complete understanding when 0 ≤ b 1 , and our result indicates that larger diffusion rate is selected, extending an earlier work [20] ( b = 1 ). However, for b > 1 the dynamics can be quite different, and particularly we illustrate that some intermediate diffusion rate may be selected when b > 3 2 .

[1]  Mark A. Lewis,et al.  The Effect of Dispersal Patterns on Stream Populations , 2005, SIAM Rev..

[2]  D. Nelson,et al.  Life and death near a windy oasis , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[3]  Konstantin Mischaikow,et al.  The evolution of slow dispersal rates: a reaction diffusion model , 1998 .

[4]  Hristo V. Kojouharov,et al.  Bacterial Wall Attachment in a Flow Reactor , 2002, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[5]  William Gurney,et al.  POPULATION PERSISTENCE IN RIVERS AND ESTUARIES , 2001 .

[6]  M. Ballyk,et al.  A model of microbial growth in a plug flow reactor with wall attachment. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[7]  Yuan Lou,et al.  Evolution of dispersal in closed advective environments , 2015, Journal of biological dynamics.

[8]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Single Phytoplankton Species Growth with Light and Advection in a Water Column , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[9]  T. F. Waters The Drift of Stream Insects , 1972 .

[10]  Frithjof Lutscher,et al.  Spatial patterns and coexistence mechanisms in systems with unidirectional flow. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[11]  C. Cosner,et al.  Spatial Ecology via Reaction-Diffusion Equations , 2003 .

[12]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal , 1983 .

[13]  J. Huisman,et al.  How Do Sinking Phytoplankton Species Manage to Persist? , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[14]  C. Cosner,et al.  Evolutionary stability of ideal free dispersal strategies in patchy environments , 2012, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  Frithjof Lutscher,et al.  Effects of Heterogeneity on Spread and Persistence in Rivers , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[16]  Yu Jin,et al.  R0 Analysis of a Spatiotemporal Model for a Stream Population , 2012, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[17]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Microbial Competition for Nutrient and Wall Sites in Plug Flow , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[18]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  A quasispecies on a moving oasis. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Monotone Dynamical Systems: An Introduction To The Theory Of Competitive And Cooperative Systems (Mathematical Surveys And Monographs) By Hal L. Smith , 1995 .

[20]  George W. Kling,et al.  Stable Isotopes Resolve the Drift Paradox for Baetis Mayflies in an Arctic River , 1993 .

[21]  James E. Byers,et al.  Going against the flow: retention, range limits and invasions in advective environments , 2006 .

[22]  T. Kolokolnikov,et al.  Phytoplankton depth profiles and their transitions near the critical sinking velocity , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  M. Kreĭn,et al.  Linear operators leaving invariant a cone in a Banach space , 1950 .

[24]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[25]  Mary Ballyk,et al.  Effects of Random Motility on Microbial Growth and Competition in a Flow Reactor , 1998, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[26]  Yuan Lou,et al.  Evolution of dispersal in open advective environments , 2013, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[27]  B. Anholt,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE RESOLVES THE STREAM DRIFT PARADOX , 1995 .